Parental involvement laws reduce abortion rate by almost 19%, study says

“… A 1996 study revealed that “parental involvement laws appear to decrease minors’ demands for abortion by 13 to 25%.” A 2008 study showed that parental consent laws reduce the minor abortion rate by 18.7%. With the loving support of their parents, many young women are able to bring their babies into the world and not face the physical risks and emotional devastation that abortions can bring.”

Mary E Harned “Parental Involvement Laws: Protecting Minors and Parental Rights” Defending Life in 2013: Deconstruction Roe Vs. Wade (DC: Americans United for Life, 2013)

Share on Facebook

Clinic worker: abortion work is isolating

In an old post from 2009, a clinic worker describes how she feels about her job:

“I don’t know about you, but sometimes I feel our work can be incredibly isolating….for me and my co-workers, it can sometimes feel like we’re alone. No one wants to hear about where you work or what you do. Often family and friends don’t even want to know about your day. Maybe it’s a sign I’ve been doing abortion work a long time because I just simply don’t talk about my day anymore. And I hardly notice that I don’t. Who’s going to understand, anyway?”

“Big Thanks” The Abortioneers December 29, 2009

Share on Facebook

Former clinic worker: I screamed at women and held them down

From a former abortion clinic worker:

“I medicated women when I wasn’t sure if I should. I treated them like their problems were their fault, held them down and screamed at them. I lied to them and treated the women like cattle and the babies like less than human.”

Wed, Oct 22, 2014 Letter from Abby Johnson “When former workers speak”

Share on Facebook

Medically induced abortion in the second trimester: Video

This video shows Dr. Byron Calhoun, a board certified obgyn, examining the bodies of two babies aborted by a medically induced labor with prostaglandin in the second trimester.

If the babies are bruised all over their bodies by contractions, try to imagine how painful those contractions must be for the mother. Normal labor is extremely painful and the contractions are far less severe.  This is an excruciatingly painful method of abortion for both the mother and baby which can take hours to accomplish.

You can see the grimace of pain on the face of the second, 18-20 week old baby.

There is one other way abortions are done in the second trimester, the D&E.

Share on Facebook

Court Records: Planned Parenthood abortionist horribly mistreated her patients

Mark Crutcher, head of Life Dynamics, cites the following case in his book Lime 5:

“A female abortionist (a member of the NAF and director of a Planned Parenthood facility) seems to enjoy seeing abortion patients suffer. According to a suit filed against her, after telling a patient to “drop your pants and get up on the table,” she performed an abortion without anesthesia. When the patient screamed in pain, the abortionist told her to shut up or they would gag her and have her “put in a psycho ward.” She then had a nurse hold her hand over the patient’s mouth. After the ordeal, the abortionist said, “Here are your pants, put them on and get out of here. This will make you think twice before having sex without contraception.” The patient said she saw at least one other woman who was hysterical in the recovery room, crawling on her hands and knees and screaming uncontrollably.”

Hennepin County (MN) district Court Case file no.89-15330

Mark Crutcher  “Lime 5: Exploited by Choice ” (Denton, Texas: Life Dynamics Incorporated, 1996)

There are many other horror stories about abortionists and clinics here.

Share on Facebook

Article claims that 80 – 90% of women would not have abortions if they were illegal

Dr. Richard R. Parlour and Dr. James H. Ford, MD examined nine studies about women and abortion and wrote, in 1974, that the studies:

“showed that 80 to 90 percent of the women who have legally induced abortions would not opt for the abortion if it were illegal.”

Richard R. Parlour, M.D; James H. Ford, MD “The Unwanted Pregnancy: Psychiatry on the Rocks” Medical Counterpoint, Oct 1974

Quoted in Mark Crutcher  “Lime 5: Exploited by Choice ” (Denton, Texas: Life Dynamics Incorporated, 1996)

This is an old source and, unfortunately, I was not able to find the original article. Mark Crutcher, author and head of Life Dynamics may be able to help research the issue further.

Share on Facebook

A lie from the past…partial birth abortion

partbrt4Partial birth abortions, where the baby is killed while partly outside the woman’s body (see illustration on left) have been illegal for close to a decade. It’s easy to forget the battle that was waged between pro-life and pro-abortion forces. Pro-lifers depicted a method of abortion so horrible it made the average person shudder – the vast majority of Americans were against partial-birth abortion. So pro-choicers had to come up with their own strategy – they claimed that the wording of the bill describing partial-birth abortions was so vague that it would ban all abortions in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. Some even claimed it would ban abortions in the 1st trimester. This way, they could put forward the argument that the partial-birth abortion ban would actually unlimited abortion in the United States – for their gullible followers, this was a way to defend something that no one in their right mind could defend. Here is a quote from Gloria Feldt:

“The language in the abortion ban statutes is sweeping and, as the Supreme Court recognized in Sternberg, could be used to prosecute doctors for providing a wide range of common and safe pre-viability procedures… If the federal law is eventually upheld by a changed Supreme Court – as is their plan – an ideologically committed Justice Department will be armed with a broadly worded statute that can be used to prosecute doctors for a dangerously wide range of pre-viability abortions, whether or not Roe is overturned.”

Well, eventually after many false starts, the bill passed, it was found constitutional, and, believe it or not, abortion continues. Abortions are still done in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters by other methods. Of course they aren’t illegal. And pro-choice activists knew all the time that they wouldn’t be. They simply lied, using whatever argument was most likely to sway their gullible followers.

Gloria Feldt the war on choice: The Right-Wing Attack on Women’s Rights and How to Fight Back (New York: Bantam Dell, 2004)  132 – 133

Share on Facebook

Ultrasonographer on censoring images

“For 10 years I have been an ultrasonographer and have witnessed the development of pre-born children. I am convinced that if every mother could see her baby on ultrasound, the abortion argument would be over.

A look through the window reveals the true victim of abortion. This is why our presentations are often censored. For example…

In 1990, I testified on fetal development before the House and Senate subcommittee considering the “Freedom of Choice Act.”

I brought an ultrasound videotape of fully formed fetuses as young as eight weeks after conception. Representative Don Edwards (his D – CA) tried to prevent me from showing the videotape.”

Shari Richard “Now Wombs Have Windows” All about Issues, volume 5 number 2

Today, pro-choicers fight tooth and nail against allowing women the option to see their babies on ultrasounds in abortion clinics.  Pro-choice organizations don’t just fight laws REQUIRING women to view the images, they  fight just as hard against laws that say an abortion provider must offer the woman a CHOICE whether or not to see them. Even offering women a CHOICE to view an ultrasound is against Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America’s agenda.

Share on Facebook

It’s harder to get an abortion, says pro-choicer

Pro-abortion activist Jay Michaelson:

“It hasn’t been this hard to get an abortion in 40 years.”

Jay MichaelsonTen Reasons Women Are Losing While Gays Keep Winning” The Daily Beat July 6, 2014

Share on Facebook

Video: abortion clinic workers laugh and joke around after sending woman to the hospital

In October 2011 an ambulance pulled up to Affiliated Medical Services to bring a woman to the hospital. Pro-lifers on the scene videotape the ambulance leaving, and then recorded a group of clinic workers laughing and joking around outside the clinic after sending the woman to the hospital. They showed a shocking disregard to her condition. You would think that if a woman was injured, perhaps severely, the clinic workers would be concerned and subdued. But they show that they are not concerned at all about the woman’s welfare. I do not know how severely injured the woman was or whether or not she recovered. However, the ambulance taken away the woman was not the first ambulance that pro-lifers have seen and recorded at this facility. See the video below.

You can read the original post on this here.

Share on Facebook