Naomi Wolf On Pictures of Aborted Babies

While most pro-choice activists deny that pictures of aborted babies are real, one pro-choice feminist admits that they are and speaks out against the hypocrisy of pro-choicers  who want to hide them:

she is referring to pictures like this one

“So what will it be: Wanted fetuses are charming, complex, REM-dreaming little beings whose profile on the sonogram looks just like Daddy, but unwanted ones are mere ‘uterine material’? How can we charge that it is vile and repulsive for pro-lifers to brandish vile and repulsive images if the images are real? To insist that the truth is in poor taste is the very height of hypocrisy. Besides, if these images are often the facts of the matter, and if we then claim that it is offensive for pro-choice women to be confronted by them, then we are making the judgment that women are too inherently weak to face a truth about which they have to make a grave decision. This view of women is unworthy of feminism.”

Naomi Wolf,  feminist author and advocate of legal abortion, in “Our Bodies, Our Souls”, The New Republic, 10/15/1995

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choice Leaders Discuss the Effectiveness of Ultrasounds In Teaching the Humanity of Unborn Babies

In an article in the Weekly Standard, the author says:

Two pro-choice leaders, Kate Michelman and Frances Kissling, acknowledged three years ago that “antiabortionists” had gained a significant advantage. Supporters of abortion, they wrote in the Los Angeles Times, “have had a hard time dealing with the increased visibility of the fetus.” To “regain the moral high ground,” they must deal with “a world that is radically changed from 1973,” when the Roe v. Wadedecision legalized abortion nationwide.

They are referring to pictures like the one below, which shows an unborn baby in the first trimester, the time when most abortions are performed

It is obvious that these images change hearts and minds, and pro-choice activists can no longer get away with arguing that the unborn baby is a clump of cells or blob of tissue. People can see the evidence with their own eyes. In fact, according to the article, 80 to 90 percent of the women who have sonograms at pregnancy centers choose to have their baby.

Perhaps this is why there is such a campaign against crisis pregnancy centers by pro-choicers who want to shut them down or at least deny them access to ultrasound machines. Pro-choice organizations bitterly fight laws that would require a woman to be offered the chance to view an ultrasound before her abortion.

Fred Barnes “Hidden Persuaders: The unheralded gains of the pro-life movement” The Weekly Standard NOV 7, 2011

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choice Writer Comments on the Silent Scream

A pro-choice author comments on The Silent Scream, an antiabortion movie that shows an unborn baby being aborted on ultrasound. Planned Parenthood pulled all the stops out to discredit this movie, because it swayed many people towards the pro-life cause.

While these facts may, as Planned Parenthood says, speak loudly, it’s unlikely that they say what the prochoice groups hope, since they put the fetus, even a televised facsimile, on center stage, precisely where prochoice groups don’t want it. Assume the film is wrong and the Planned Parenthood brochure is right. Assume that was a fetal yawn and not a scream. None of the experts contested that it was a fetal mouth, and that it was pan of a fetal head, attached to a fetal spine, and that it had arms andlegs, fingers and eyes.  ….

In fact, we need neither The Silent Scream nor a degree in fetal physiology to tell us what we already know: that abortion is the eradication of human life and should be avoided whenever possible. Should it be legal? Yes, since the alternatives are worse. Is it moral? Perhaps, depending on what’s at stake.

Jason Deparle, “Beyond the Legal Right; Why Liberals and Feminists Don’t like to Talk about the Morality of Abortion,” Washington Monthly Apr. 1989

3-D ultrasound in the first trimester
Share on Facebook

Kathleen Sebelius Calls Pictures of Aborted Babies a “Discomfort”

Secretary of health Kathleen Sebelius encountered pro-life protesters with pictures of aborted babies when she attended a fundraiser for NARAL Pro-Choice America (the fund raiser was also for Obama) Her only reaction to the signs depicting the torn apart bodies of the babies she supports killing was:

“It is a discomfort when you’re coming to lunch…”

Sebelius to NARAL crowd: Graphic abortion photos a “discomfort when you’re coming to lunch” Jill Stanek (Oct 6, 2011)

Below: Picture of a nine week old baby torn apart by an abortion

To read more pro-choice reactions to pictures of aborted babies, go here.

Share on Facebook

Abortion Rights Columnist Anne Roiphe Comments on the Effectiveness of Pictures

Abortion rights columnist Anne Roiphe:

“The antiabortion forces will again display horrible pictures of the technique, which they call partial-birth abortion. Although few in the abortion rights movement take this approach seriously, it has emotional resonance and arose public support for all abortion.”

Anne Roiphe, “Moment of Perception” New York Times, September 19, 1996

James F Bohan. The House of Atreus: Abortion Is a Human Rights Issue (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers, 1999)

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choicer: Abortion Is “Gruesome” and “Awful”

Cynthia Gorney, pro-choice author:

“One of the dirty secrets of abortion is it’s really gruesome, but nobody would look at the pictures. With partial-birth, the right to life movement succeeded for the first time, forcing the country to really look at one awful abortion procedure.”

Cited in Larry Reibestein, “Arguing at a Fever Pitch,” Newsweek, January 26, 1998

Scott Klusendorf. The Case for Life: Equipping Christians to Engage the Culture. (Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway Books, 2009) 242

Share on Facebook

Pro-choice Activist Complains about Pictures of Unborn Babies

At the October 1989 annual conference of the National Abortion Rights Action League, pollster Harrison Hickman stated in a workshop entitled ‘Framing and Selling the Pro-Choice Message’ that:

“Nothing has been as damaging to our cause as the advances in technology which have allowed pictures of the developing fetus, because people now talk about the fetus in much different terms than they did 15 years ago. They talk about it as a human being, which is not something that I have an easy answer how to cure.”

Quoted in Frederica Mathews-Green. Real Choices: Offering Practical, Life-Affirming Alternatives to Abortion (Sisters, Oregon: Multnomah Books, 1994) 30

sonogram in the first trimester
Share on Facebook

Defenders of Abortion Can’t Match Photographs

Pro-choice author Janet Hadley said the following in her book “Abortion: between Freedom and Necessity” (Great Britain: Virago Press) 1996:

“Defenders of abortion never have anything to match the visual image of the fetus, the most emotive weapon of all… no words are needed to accompany pictures of little mangled legs, hacked arms, crushed skulls…”

Hadley quotes Tony Kaye, who shot graphic footage of aborted babies for a film he was directing:

“When you see those fetuses, it is pretty much game set and match as far as I’m concerned.”

This was quoted on page 150

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choice Author Laments Unborn Baby Pictures

From pro-choice author Melody Rose:

12 weeks sonogram

“The images and language most often wielded by pro-life advocates are vivid and emotional… recent developments in imaging technique certainly have facilitated a reliance on powerful pictures that humanize the fetus in a way not possible two decades ago. Because fetuses now can be seen in intricate detail, opponents of abortion have striking images to use in support of abortion restrictions, despite what these restrictions might mean to women’s health and freedom.”

Melody Rose “Safe, Legal and Unavailable? Abortion Politics in the United States” (Washington DC: CQ Press) 2007 p 10 to 11

 

Share on Facebook

If Wombs Had Windows…

Former abortionist Dr. Bernard Nathanson, in his book Aborting America, acknowledged how seeing unborn babies has a powerful impact on people when he said:

“Fewer women would have abortions if wombs had windows.”

Aborting America (Life Cycle Books (June 1979)

sonogram of 8-week-old baby in the womb
Share on Facebook