Abortion Provider: Glenn E Miller

In January of 2005, The California Medical Board revoked the license of abortionist Glenn E. Miller in repsonse to findings during Medical Board of California Case # D1-1996-70206

The board accused Miller of being intoxicated while on duty.

In 1997, Miller was having so much trouble controlling his drinking that it became apparent to fellow employees. The case details that even though Miller repeatedly entered rehab programs he continued to relapse into drinking. In 1998 a psychiatric evaluation of Miller established,
“That there existed a high likelihood of danger to patients if treatment were unsuccessful.”

The Golden Gate Planned Parenthood Group later employed Miller in the Bay area. In December of 1998, despite Miller’s history of intoxication, the Women’s Community Medical (abortion) Clinic in San Jose also employed him for the purpose of surgical procedures relating to abortion.

On July 3, 2000, according to the report of his diversion program manager, Miller was “brought in drunk and passed out at White Memorial Hospital’s ER this weekend.”

On June 12, 2003, he again tested positive for alcohol while in the employment of The Women’s Community Medical (abortion) clinic. He blamed the result on something he had eaten, but was ordered to cease practicing medicine for six months. Miller continued to drink and in one occasion after failing to show up for a urine test, Miller was contacted by telephone and appeared “totally incoherent.”

Miller later enrolled into a program where Miller claims his therapist failed to treat him for issues relating to his past (he claimed he was abused as a child). In an interesting revelation, Miller’s therapist diagnosed him as having a sexual addiction and recommended that Miller never be able to treat a female patient.

Bertha Bugarin, owner of several abortion clinics that employed Miller testified in the case that Miller was in her estimation:

“responsible, punctual, and professional”

and despite the overwhelming evidence of Miller’s addictions,

“would welcome Miller back into her abortion clinics.”

Credit; Life Dymanics

 

 

Share on Facebook

Letter to a Birth Mother

Many women facing abortion have a hard time imagining having their baby and giving her up for adoption, but this can be a termendous act of courage and love. Dear Abby recieved a heartfelt letter from a new grandmother whose daughter had adopted a baby.

“Dear Abby,

“My daughter and her husband, after years of indescribable pain and disappointment, just went to the hospital to pick up their brand-new baby girl. Their joy and happy tears would warm the coldest of hearts.

I want the birth mother to know that her love, courage and feelings of loss have not been forgotten in our moments of joy. Your baby will know from the beginning that you had choices and you chose to give her life. You performed the most unselfish act I can imagine, and I question if I would have had your strength of character.

Saying thank you seems inadequate. I wish I could put my arms around you and say “I love you” and I hope my new granddaughter inherits your heart and courage. May the rest of your life be blessed as you blessed ours.”

Adoption is an option where no one has to die. Everybody wins- the child, who gets a chance at life, he adopted family (parents, siblings, grandparents, etc) all the friends and loved ones that that child will have growing up, and the birth mother herself, who never has to deal with the guilt of having killed her baby.

Consider adoption.

 

 

Share on Facebook

Abortion Provider: George Wayne Patterson

The Associated Press reported in an article that appeared in the Birmingham News,Abortion doctor lost at gambling, probers say (09/03/93), that abortionist George Wayne Patterson had over $80,000 in gambling debts before he was killed in a Mobile, Alabama parking lot located in the nightclub district, right outside an adult theater.

In his Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, Patterson reportedly said his gambling losses for the previous year totaled $50,000. He owed at least three bookies $80,000.

George Wayne Patterson was responsible for the deaths of two women from botched abortions.

While many people from many walks of life have gambling problems, it is possible that the stress of Patterson’s job may have contributed to his irresponsible behavior. Many abortionists have spoken about the such as seeing the torn apart bodies of aborted children every day.

 

 

Share on Facebook

Abortion Provider: Vinod K Goyal

On November 17, 2004, the Wisconsin Medical Examining Board reviewed the application for medical licensure submitted by abortionist Vinod K. Goyal.

In their findings The Wisconsin Board noted that in 1992 and 1993, the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation (IDPR) received four complaints from insurance carriers alleging that Goyal’s clinics had provided inaccurate information regarding charges for services.

Goyal entered into a stipulation for settlement with the IDPR to resolve the complaints. As a part of the settlement, Goyal agreed to revise his office intake forms to avoid future problems with inaccurate fee quotes, to desist in efforts to collect unpaid fees in connection with the inaccurate fee quotes, and to pay a monetary fine of $4,000.00. In addition, the IDPR placed Goyal’s medical license on a two-year probationary period.

In 1996, Goyal agreed to a reprimand by the IDPR in connection with possible misleading statement made by him during a proceeding involving a Certificate of Need application for relocation of his medical office. Goyal wanted to open an abortion clinic in Arlington Heights and told the Illinois Health Facilities Board he needed to move the clinic from Des Plaines to Arlington Heights because of “abhorrent conditions. ”

Dennis Tobin, Goyal’s attorney told the Chicago Daily Herald, (Doctor fined for exaggerating poor conditions at his clinic 11/13/97), Goyal was dissatisfied with how much money he was shelling out to fix problems at the building, which they claim the landlord would not take care of. Goyal lied when he told the Illinois Health Facilities Board that the building was full of rodents and dirty rooms, placing his abortion patients in jeopardy. The lie was a scam for profit reasons alone.

Illinois Health Facilities Board member Richard Wright recalls Goyal showing pictures of flood damage at the hearing.”I recall thinking, ‘If it is so bad, why are you still practicing there?’ ” Wright said. That is why board members decided to send a transcript of Goyal’s statements to the regulation board who visited the site for themselves.

Spokeswoman Maureen Squires said the inspectors did not find rodents or dirty rooms as Goyal had described. They found no patients to be in jeopardy. Although he was fined, it does not mean he can not practice medicine, she said. “It is a black mark on his record and any employer or patient can check it,” she said. “It will remain as a permanent mark.”

In a signed consent order, Goyal admitted the statements he made about the physical condition of the Des Plaines facility were misleading. Goyal was assessed a $2,000.00 fine in connection with the disciplinary action against his license.

Beginning in 1978 and through 1996, a report provided by the IDPR indicates nine malpractice claims had been filed against Goyal. The majority of the suits were settled out of court by the insurance carrier. Goyal was dismissed as a party in at least three of the malpractice actions because he was not directly involved in the patient care.

Source: Life Dynamics

Share on Facebook

Abortion Provider: Colin Bailey

On August 8, 1990, on the basis of his history and the practice of cocaine abuse, abortionist Colin Bailey entered into a voluntary agreement with the NY State Department of Health, Bureau of Professional Misconduct to remain drug free and to have his urine randomly tested. The following incidents occurred prior to and after the date of this agreement.

— September 6,1989: during a physical, Bailey’s urine tested positive for cocaine and he was suspended from Metropolitan Hospital.

— Bailey used cocaine the week following his suspension and at least once 6 months after he was suspended from Metropolitan Hospital.

— In 1991: Bailey’s urine tested positive for cocaine, January 7th and January 15th .

Bailey was charged with negligence on more than one occasion, gross incompetence, drug dependence, and fraud.

Bailey admitted to the charges of negligence, incompetence; practicing fraudulently; being dependent on cocaine and failing to maintain accurate records.

Source: Life Dynamics and commissioner’s report

 

Share on Facebook

Abortion Provider: Benjamin P Thamrong

Why get copies of health department and medical board documents? How else can you find out what the abortionist has in his refrigerator? And abortionist Benjamin P. Thamrong had some of the strangest stuff in his.

Thamrong first came to my attention when somebody sent a clipping of the North Jersey Herald & News for December 22, 1989. A woman said she’d met Thamrong when he performed an abortion on her in 1977. He hired her as a receptionist and had an extramarital affair with her. She alleged that it was his mistreatment of her that prompted her to throw their 2-year-old son to his death from the top of an apartment building, then leap herself.

Thamrong originally opened his facility in 1981, in an area of Fairfield Township not zoned for clinics. Thamrong filed six $1 million lawsuits against the township and its officers, demanding hearings to prove that the facility, which he advertised as a clinic, was actually his private office. The hearings found that the North Jersey Women’s Health Organization (WHO) leased the building, owned the equipment, hired and paid staff, handled all the financial arrangements, and had written a manual classifying the facility as a clinic. Thamrong and WHO officer Susan Hill protested that the manual wasn’t something anybody actually followed, and that they actually made all their arrangements verbally. The hearing also uncovered irregularities in Thamrong’s federal tax returns, such as claiming WHO’s expenditures as his own business expenses.
So before we even check with the powers that be, we find a crazed former abortion patient turned receptionist/lover who killed their child then tried to kill herself, we find dubious business practices, and we find evidence of federal income tax evasion.

Looking closer

We checked to see what other strangeness had been going on around Dr. Benjamin P. Thamrong. From a New Jersey Administrative Complaint filed October 3, 1989, we learned the following:

A patient I’ll call “Bianca” had abortion done by Thamrong in his office on January 14, 1988. On January 17, she passed a fetal head. A medical examiner estimated the head as from an 18 to 22-week fetus. Bianca’s records were subpoenaed January 22. On January 28 a lab picked up a specimen from Thanmrong’s office, labeled with Bianca’s name, containing a specimen of a 6-8 week fetus. The health department obtained Bianca’s chart from Thamrong. “The chart was completely typed with no handwritten entries and indicated that [Bianca] was only 12+ weeks pregnant.” The wrong blood type was entered in the chart. The board alleged violation of a law limiting abortions done in doctors’ offices to less than 16 weeks of gestation. It also alleged the submission of falsified records and “employment of dishonesty, fraud, deception or misrepresentation.”

Concerning another patient I’ll call “Rachel,” the board noted that during 1986 Thamrong issued 19 prescriptions each for 30-day supplies of Seconol and 40 Percodan for Rachel, but he maintained no patient record for her. In 1987 he prescribed at least 14 prescriptions each for 30 Seconol and 40 Percodan for Rachel. Over a 32-day period in 1988 he gave Rachel prescriptions for 120 doses of Seconal and 160 doses of Percodan. The board said, “The dispensing of Seconal and Percodan to [Rachel] was done without medical justification with an apparent lack of regard for the significant abuse potential of this drug and with gross disregard for the life, health, safety and welfare of said person.” The complaint also leveled additional charges of prescribing similarly excessive amounts of controlled substances to at least six other patients, usually without office visits. “Many if not most of [Thamrong’s] patient records are difficult to read or follow and are sketchy at best. It is difficult to tell how he arrived at the diagnoses and the plans for treatment almost never look beyond the immediate prescription of medication.”

The complaint also noted that records for at least nine patients showed virtually identical vital signs. “Virtually all respiratory rates were 20, virtually all pulse rates were 70, the vast majority of temperatures were exactly 98.6, and the vast majority of blood pressures were either 120/80 or 110/70, totally out of line with the normal expected day to day variations in vital signs, indicating that respondent did not accurately measure them or did not measure them at all.”

The complaint also noted Thamrong’s failure to promptly deliver patient records in response to the subpoena, with extensions and delays of in some cases over three months. Some patient records sent in response to the subpoena had been altered or added to since they had been observed during the inspection. For example, patient “Ophilia’s” file at the time of inspection recorded three visits, with information largely limited to her name and the date. The records forwarded in response to the subpoena were completely filled out, including the addition of an abortion procedure form, a note on Ophilia’s Rh-negative blood, and lab reports.

The complaint also covered an inspection of the abortion facility itself. The complaint noted:

The cover of the examination table was dirty and torn. The suction machine container and tubing were dirty and stained. Thamrong’s abortion patients were treated in procedure room replete with unsterile instruments, expired supplies, soiled gauze, a dirty speculum, and soiled suction tubing. The facility had no emergency equipment.

Patients were sent for recovery to a room that contained two recliner chairs, a disused autoclave, a tray full of instruments to be sterilized — and nothing that could be used to check their blood pressure.

And let’s not forget the refrigerator. It contained: expired medications, three syringes, a dirty carving knife, a specimen envelope containing a tube of blood collected 22 days earlier, one mostly-eaten salad, one partially-empty bottle each of Coca Cola and Sunkist soda, a bottle of Yoo Hoo, a half-full bottle of Riuniti peach wine, and a quarter-full bottle of Asti Spumanti with a paper towel stuffed in the top.

Aside from the question of why medical specimens and staff lunches were kept in the same fridge, I couldn’t figure out if this guy was a tasteless tippler, or a dropout from the Belfast School of Bartending. And who, pray tell, was slurping down Riuniti on the premises of a medical practice? And was this imbibing taking place before or after the patients were led into the unsavory procedure room?

The complaint also alleged that Thamrong had been falsifying insurance forms.

Thamrong was sentenced to four years’ probation for billing Medicaid for abortions patients had already paid for. He was also fined $10,000 and ordered to pay $12,088 in restitution — despite his plea that he was deeply in debt and that he’d find it a hardship to pay.

And how did Thamrong respond, once his faults had been discovered? He presented health department inspectors with gift-wrapped boxes of money (one containing $1,000 and one containing $500). The investigators reported the transaction as an attempted bribe. Boxed in, Thamrong finally surrendered his license.

And lest you dismiss Thamrong as a fly-by-night flake, I’ll take a minute to remind you that he was operating under the auspices of the Women’s Health Organization — which has been, and still may be, a National Abortion Federation member organization. WHO “was founded in 1976 with the goal to provide exceptional medical services to women in a safe and comfortable environment,” says their Web site. “All clinics” it goes on, “comply with Federal, State and Local regulations and meet or exceed all medical standards.”

Did NAF and WHO know what kind of place this was, or did they just not care?

Sources: New York Daily News 7-13-92; New Jersey Administrative Complaint filed 10-3-89; North Jersey Herald & News 12-22-89; The Chronicle 10-20-82, 2-9-83, 3-16-83, 3-23-83, 3-2-84

Article by Christina Dunigan.

 

 

 

 

 

Share on Facebook

Abortion’s Impact on Men

Losing a child by abortion.

The mental pain and anguish suffered by women who abort their babies is well known and widely publicized within the pro-life movement. In addition, an extensive, grass roots network exists to assist women who face the aftermath of abortion.
What about a man involved in the decision to abort his baby?

Does he too suffer negative psychological effects? If so, where can he turn for help to cope? As we investigate these questions and more, you will be surprised by the answers.

Peter and his girlfriend had sex only once. A short time later she phoned to tell him that she was pregnant, even though they had each used contraception. With him as a reluctant participant, she aborted their child. Their relationship was one of the first casualties of the abortion. Peter cited a lack of trust as the reason for the split. Within a couple of months he was using alcohol and drugs to get temporary relief from the pain. In an attempt to deal with his grief, he reached out to his brothers and sisters, only to be told that he did the right thing. His fear of women kept him from dating for 8 years.

Tad was divorced when his girlfriend got pregnant and they agreed to abort their baby. In the process, the relationship was destroyed. Not long after his second marriage, his daughter got pregnant and he assisted her to abort his grandchild. It wasn’t until his daughter planned her second abortion that Tad realized the humanity of the unborn child. In his effort to bury his feelings about the abortions, he assumed a “wooden demeanor”. During this time Tad said he did a lot of damage to his wife and children by being withdrawn.

These are just two of more than thirty-million men who are struggling to cope with the loss of their children through abortion. For many they willingly participated in the decision to abort and assisted their partners in securing an abortion. Several even pressured their partners into having an abortion. Sadly, some watched helplessly as their precious unborn child was aborted in spite of their pleas to give their baby life. Still others weren’t told of their fatherhood until after their child had already died in the abortion chamber.

Motivating factors

In many ways men and women respond very differently to the loss of a child from abortion. To empathize with a man’s reaction to this profound loss, it is important to first understand what motivates the human male species.
Instinct drives men to achieve success in five key areas of their lives. Men are often defined by their ability to: [enjoy] pleasure, procreate, provide, protect and perform. Let’s briefly examine each of these instincts in the context of abortion.

Pleasure. The desire for men to enjoy pleasure extends beyond the need for sexual satisfaction and fulfillment. It also encompasses the enjoyment of having children, watching them grow, learn and become independent and productive citizens in their own right. Men also seek the pleasure of a life-mate, a wife who will provide companionship through the ups and downs along the way.

Procreate. Perhaps the most important element motivating man is his desire to procreate. Men provide an essential role in the continuation of the human race. Almost every man, whether he verbalizes it or not, values the idea of having offspring of his own flesh and blood – carrying on the family name or bloodline.

Provide. A man’s reproductive cycle ends with the act of sex – the same time that a woman’s cycle begins. Therefore a man’s priority shifts from procreation to providing for the mother and the unborn offspring he has fathered. He instinctively knows that this new family will look to him for many of the day-to-day necessities. In his mind it is important that he succeeds in providing for them.

Protect. Like providing for his family, man is highly programmed to protect his family. During his child’s lifetime there will be many dangers to continually guard against – the threats of illness or injury, making wise decisions and knowing when to say no to a myriad of tempting offers throughout life. The need for a man to protect his offspring should not be underestimated.

Perform. When talked about in contemporary society, this word most often refers to a man’s sexual ability. While this applies, it is not limited to sexual activity. Performance encompasses man’s ability to perform in various aspects of life. Job performance is often primary to defining a man’s success – the income it generates, the social standing it provides and the attained admiration of his peers.

Successful performance in the social arena secures friendships and helps a man achieve his desire for pleasure.
Society often judges a man based on his ability to be successful at pleasure, procreation, provision, protection and performance. When a man experiences abortion, these key elements of life are seriously damaged, or often totally obliterated.

The symptoms

Perhaps the most consistent and evident symptom in men due to loss of a child from abortion is anger. A counselor, who personally experienced the abortion decision, indicated that every man he has counseled has a higher level of anger than before the abortion. In addition, each has acted on that anger in some way that was harmful to himself or someone else. Another counselor likened this anger to that of a “ticking time-bomb just waiting to go off.”

A man’s anger and frustration of not being able to protect and provide for his unborn baby, because of abortion, manifests itself in several ways. He often turns to alcohol and drugs to dull the pain of knowing he participated in or was too “weak” to prevent the death of his unborn baby. Many become workaholics to avoid contact with other people or in a desperate effort to succeed in a crucial aspect of their life.

The relationship most always fails after a decision to abort. In addition, future relationships with women are often difficult or impossible. A woman has total control over the decision to abort their baby, leaving the father no legal recourse. This lack of control regarding a critical, life-impacting decision often generates considerable resentment and mistrust towards women. As a result of a previous experience, they do not want to be put into another situation where another pregnancy may occur and they have no control of the outcome. Men may suffer from forms of sexual dysfunction such as impotency and addiction to pornography and masturbation.

Other symptoms of a man struggling with a loss from abortion may be that he suffers from sleeplessness, panic attacks, poor coping skills, flashbacks, nightmares or self-imposed isolation. He may be unable to hold a job due to his inability to handle decision making, or he may be an excessive risk-taker in work and social environments, setting himself up for failure. This may come from the feeling that he deserves what he gets for being a loser and failing when it counted most – protecting his unborn baby.

Dealing with the symptoms

To be most effective, a man should receive counsel from another man when dealing with the grief and shame caused by an abortion decision. A man can better assist another man struggling with the loss of his child and fatherhood.
In general, men are more successful than women at burying their feelings after an abortion. If a man fails to face the emotional aftermath of losing his child to abortion within the first couple of months, he will often suppress it for many years, making it more difficult to face. Many men acknowledge various problems in their life without connecting them to a previous abortion decision.

Society makes it doubly tough for men to deal with the aftermath of abortion. First, most in the secular realm don’t even acknowledge the existence of Post-Abortion Syndrome (PAS) in women. Secondly, men are often taught as children that it is less than manly to show weakness or cry. As a result, men have no societal incentive to realistically deal with their abortion decision.

When addressing post-traumatic stress in men, it is not effective to approach it from the angle of PAS. Men tend to be compartmental thinkers. A vast majority of them have bought into the false rhetoric that abortion is solely a woman’s decision. Talking to them about PAS will only enforce their belief that this is something that affects only women.

A man may be more open to talking about and dealing with the loss of his child in the context of abortion. That loss has affected him dramatically. However, he may not yet be aware that it is the root-cause of his problems. It may be helpful to talk about the symptoms commonly experienced by other men after an abortion decision. When he realizes that he shares many of those symptoms, he is more apt to look at the cause for his problems in a new light.

Most experienced counselors advocate a gentle but direct approach. This is no time for subtlety. Tell him it’s OK to grieve for the baby he will never see or hold in his arms. Let him cry for his profound loss. Let him cry as much and as often as he needs to. He needs to grieve the loss and shame.

Almost every woman who has begun the road to recovery after her abortion has given credit to the fact that she returned to, or discovered, her religious faith. That has proven to also be true with men. Allow him to experience the joy of knowing he has complete, divine forgiveness. This will enable him to move on to the next crucial stage of obtaining that God-given peace within himself. This is likely the hardest step to complete. Because of his deep fear and distrust, he may feel unworthy of a relationship with God.

Counselors encourage churches to deal openly with this problem. “There are many Christian men, sitting in pews, who haven’t dealt with their abortion decision,” said one counselor. When speaking of his own experience he said, “If one man or the church had said something, I would have responded.”

For churches and organizations that deal with counseling from a religious perspective, there are men’s bible studies available, tailored to suit various groups. Other resources are also available when dealing with men and their grief.
These resources are still in their infancy, but will be able to assist men facing a post-abortive struggle. Please call or write Life Issues Institute for a free list of resources including experienced counselors who deal with men’s loss after abortion.

Life Issues Institute is working to network people and materials in this field. Please send us samples of any materials or information on anyone you have in your area, qualified to assist these men. Write to: Life Issues Institute, 1721 West Galbraith Road, Cincinnati, OH 45239. Or phone (513) 729-3600.

This article was published in Life Issues Connector June 1996 edition. It was written by Bradley Mattes.

Note: Religious beliefs and organizations are not necessarily endorsed by the webmaster.

Share on Facebook

Viability and Abortion

Some people believe that an unborn baby is not “alive” or a “person” until he or she is able to live outside the womb. The problem with this is that viability, or the time that a baby is developed enough to live outside the mother, is constantly changing.

According to the Miami Herald, baby Kenya King was born in plantation, Florida at 21 weeks .She weighed 510 g “18 ounces” 10.5 inches. After lengthy stay in the hospital, she came home, perfectly healthy baby.(1)

Kenya King and Her Mother

What about the allegations that a baby born this early will suffer from extremely serious handicaps? Some babies who survive this early to have handicaps later in life. However, survey done of teenagers who were born between 20 and 23 weeks revealed the following:

“[They] view their health-related quality of life is quite satisfactory.”(2)\

Here are ads offering to kill children beyond 23 weeks, clearly after viability

Note: “fetal anomalies” often means conditions like Down Syndrome and other nonlethal problems in the baby.

Sometimes children aborted this late survive the abortion procedure and have to be disposed of by the doctors. See the section on “born alive after abortions” in the menu for some of these stories.

Footnotes

1. JC Willke “Why Can’t We Love Them Both: Questions and Answers about Abortion” (Cincinnati, Ohio: Hayes Publishing, 1997) P91
2. “Self Perceived Health Status and Health Related Quality of Life of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants At Adolescence” JAMA, August 14, 1996, P453

Share on Facebook

Abortion Provider: Suresh Gandotra

San Diego abortionist Suresh Gandotra fled the country after the District Attorney filed manslaughter charges against him following the death of one of his patients.

Gandotra had no hospital admitting privileges at any facility. In fact, he did not even know where a hospital was. After he botched an abortion on a patient, Gandotra failed to immediately call an ambulance. In fact, according to the Medical Board’s court filing, the abortionist asked for directions to the hospital by car, and planned on sending the patient in a car to the hospital despite her deteriorating condition.

He was told to summon an ambulance immediately. He tried to request a private ambulance, but failed so he finally called 911. Due to the abortionist’s delays, Paramedics didn’t arrive until over an hour later, at which time, they found the woman bleeding, in cardiac arrest and with no pulse. The woman bled to death.

Gandotra remains at large.

Los Angeles Times articles “Handful of abortion clinics put poor at risk” (04/05/98) and “Abortion patient’s death shows license system flaws” (03/21/95)

Source: Life Dynamics

 

Share on Facebook

Abortion Provider: Ivan Namihas

Los Angeles abortionist Dr. Ivan Namihas is a rapist and sexual predator who operated an abortion clinic and molested or raped the women he treated. He was found guilty by the medical board for sexual abuse, sexual misconduct, gross negligence, and incompetence.

Some of the charges dated back from 1969. Over 100 women claim to have been sexually assaulted or harassed by him. He was formally charged with four counts of rape, 45 incidents of sexual abuse, mail fraud (he billed patients for treatments that were medically unnecessary)and gross negligence.

According to testimonies by women, he raped some with foreign objects, forced others to perform oral sex on him, had sex with a nurse while his patient was in labor, made crude comments of a sexual nature to patients while examining them, solicited dates from patients and patient’s friends even while he was performing abortions, and gave false diagnoses to patients. According to those who worked with him, he gave these false diagnoses for financial reasons, hoping to treat women for conditions they did not have in order to collect money from them and their insurance companies.

One former employee said that Namihas “seemed to get some perverse pleasure” from inflicting pain on women.

Assistant US attorney Jonathan S. Shapiro said, “The term abuse of a position of trust, seems to have been coined for Dr. Ivan C. Namihas, MD. Arrogant, cruel, and greedy, he carried out a particular form of fraud against his victims.”

Sources: LA Times article, Patients allege gynecologist hated women: 3-22-1992, Life Dynamics, US Atty. bulletin June 1997 volume 45 number 3,”Report Details Pro-Abortion Violence, Crimes” By Robert Kumpel, Los Angeles Lay Catholic Mission; November 2001 Issue

 

Share on Facebook