Clinic shows woman supposed abortion remains, deceives her

A woman who had an abortion recalls that clinic workers offered to show her the remains of her aborted baby. She was 10 weeks along. However, the clinic showed her a lump of tissue, not consistent with the remains of a 10 week abortion. The clinic deceived her.

“One of the younger nurses came in and she was real nice, and she said, “Would you like to see what we extracted?” And I said, “yeah.” I had never heard of them doing this before. But she came in carrying this little silver pan and she said, “This is it.” It was just a little blob, it didn’t look like anything. I thought, “No big deal.” I’m so glad I saw that. Because you hear that at 10 weeks it’s fully formed, and on and on. And it probably is, but it was covered up, it didn’t look like anything. Like chicken fat. Bloody mess or something.”

Sumi Hoshiko Our Choices: Women’s Personal Decisions about Abortion (New York: Harrington Park Press, 1993) 82

Here are the legs of a 10 week old preborn baby. At this stage, the child is fully formed.

10 weeks

You can see the delicate veins running under the skin. Below is a picture of an aborted baby at 10 weeks.

10 2

Obviously, the clinic deceived her.

 

Share on Facebook

Abortion clinic workers instructed on words to use – avoid “baby”

From a woman who interviewed abortion clinic workers at several clinics described her observation:

“… A good deal of time was devoted to “word sensitization” – the need to choose one’s words with extraordinary care when discussing the abortion procedure with clients.… The most interesting problem was how to refer to the product of the abortion. Although it was acknowledged that many clients would refer to this as the “baby,” or the “pregnancy,” new counselors were, not surprisingly, urged not to use these charged terms, but instead to use the more neutral, though admittedly more awkward, “product of conception” or “tissue.”

Carole Joffe The Regulation of Sexuality: Experiences of Family-Planning Workers (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986) 94

Share on Facebook

Planned Parenthood and adoption advice

A prolife woman did an experiment. She called Planned Parenthood clinics and asked for information about adoption. This is what she found:

“I contacted six Planned Parenthood offices located in towns or cities with a population of 50,000 or more, all within a 250 mile radius. All gave me similar information. None of the Planned Parenthood representatives in any of these offices could offer me concrete assistance in my adoption request. Each representative told me I could contact children’s services or I could make an appointment to visit their Planned Parenthood office to receive information on all my options. In one city, the representative said if I visited their office and decided on adoption, she would give me a number to call for discussing adoption choices. When I asked for the name and number on the phone, the woman indicated I would have to schedule an appointment, insisting I needed to sit down with someone to review the options.… If Planned Parenthood claims its greatest concern is family planning and ensuring a loving home for all children, then why could they provide the only with the same assistance I could have just as easily found looking in the Yellow Pages?”

Phoebe Lee Casualties of Indulgence: from Life to Aborted (New York: Writer’s Showcase, 2001) 53 – 55

Share on Facebook

Clinic workers careful not to use the word “baby”

Author Wendy Simonds summarizes a study done by Carole Joffe:

“In Carole Joffe’s ethnographic work at an abortion clinic that performed first-trimester abortions, she found out, “the most interesting problem was how to refer to the product of the abortion. Although it was acknowledged that many clients would refer to this as “baby,” or “the pregnancy,” new counselors were, not surprisingly, urged not to use these charged terms, but instead to use the more neutral, though admittedly more awkward, “products of conception” or “tissue.”

Wendy Simonds. Abortion at Work: Ideology and Practice in a Feminist Clinic (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1996).80

Share on Facebook

UCLA offered pregnant students no support, discovers Lila Rose

“I wanted to find out if UCLA would help a student who wanted to keep her baby…I went to my university’s health center, saying that I was pregnant, and asked, ‘What can I do?’ The student counselor, a nurse-practitioner, told me that ‘UCLA does not support women who are pregnant nor help them.’ I was told that UCLA has two abortionists on call. That was the extent of support that this institution, this great university, had to offer students who might be pregnant.”

Lila Rose, founder of Live Action 

Jeff Gardner “Lila Rose is up to something” Celebrate Life March-April 2010

Share on Facebook

Pro-abortion leader on partial-birth lie – she knew better

Partial-birth abortion diagram
Partial-birth abortion diagram

When states were trying to ban the partial-birth abortion procedure, the pro-choice movement came up with many lies to defend it. Partial-birth abortions were late-term abortions done when the baby was partly out of the mother. They are now illegal, but it was a long struggle to make them that way.

“The spin out of Washington was that it was only done for medical necessity, even though we knew it wasn’t so. I kept waiting for [the National Abortion Federation] to clarify it and they never did. I got caught up: What do we do about this secret? Who do we tell and what happens when we tell? But frankly, no one was asking me, so I didn’t have to worry.”

Renee Chelian, president of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers

“Abortion: Activists lied: Pro-choice advocates admit to deception.” Bergen Record, February 27, 1997

Share on Facebook

There was lack of access to abortion counseling soon after Roe V Wade

David R. Mace describes how in the early years of abortion’s legalization, women did not have much of a chance to talk to counselors about their abortion decisions. Today, often the only “counselors” women speak to before their abortions are those that are employed by the clinic. The clinic is, after all, selling abortions. Crisis pregnancy centers have tried to fill the gap, providing information for women that is not given out in the clinics.

“What counseling services are in fact available to this woman [who is considering abortion]? There are, of course, competent professional men and women in every community- psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, pastoral counselors, marriage counselors. But she probably knows little of these people to meet her particular need. She may make tentative inquiries only to find she can’t get an appointment for several weeks- such people are usually heavily booked up. She may in any case need several interviews at short notice, and that introduces greater complications. Also, there is the problem of cost- she may be scraping the bottom of the financial barrel to pay for the abortion if she decides to have it. Generally speaking, the usual professional counseling services seem to be pretty inaccessible to this woman.”

David R. Mace Abortion: The Agonizing Decision (Oliphants, 1973) 111

Share on Facebook

Abortion worker: women don’t need to know the “ins and outs” of procedure

From one clinic worker, complaining about this state-mandated counseling that requires her to talk about the abortion procedure of the development of the baby:

I don’t know if I think counseling should be a legal requirement. It should absolutely be an option, probably even encouraged, but I definitely don’t think all of my patients need it or benefit from it. Beyond the informed consent piece, at least – certainly everyone needs to know about risks and aftercare instructions, as with any medical procedure. But I DON’T think women need to hear about the ins and outs of the actual procedure unless they want to; no other type of surgery/procedure requires that level of knowledge on the patient’s part. I’ve had patients strongly object to hearing the details of the procedure, and I hate that I have to tell them anyway. If they’re sure they need an abortion, the details of the procedure really don’t matter.

What I hear you saying is… The Abortioneers  December 30, 2010

Share on Facebook

Kate Michelman speaks out against “antichoice propaganda”

An interview with Kate Michelman, then president of the National Abortion Rights Action League (Now called NARAL Pro-Choice):

Q: What is your objection to requiring that women understand fetal development of the unborn child in order to make an informed decision regarding abortion?

A: The sole purpose behind anti-choice propaganda laws is to use misleading and deceptive information to dissuade women from having abortions. Such laws force doctors and counselors to repeat inside abortion clinics the harassing comments that “Operation Rescue” and other protesters scream at women outside the clinic. Such laws jeopardize women’s health and violate the doctor-patient relationship by interfere with the doctor’s ability to tailor medical counseling and care to each woman’s specific medical needs.”

The following picture was put out by the National Abortion Federation and handed out at abortion clinics.(The drawing is enlarged to show detail)

nafdrawing

 

In reality, this is what a six-week-old embryo looks like:

05to6 weeks

Below is what a fetus at nine weeks looks like:

9week_side

And this is what a 12 week old fetus looks like:

12weeks_closeup

Here is the hand of a fetus at 12 weeks:

12weeks-image-3-150x150

Verify the facts of fetal development at the Endowment for Human Development, a scientific site that is not affiliated with any religious or pro-life organization.

“Voices of the Abortion Debate” New Dimensions, 1990

Share on Facebook

Clinic director only hired people who never say the word “baby”

From the director of Open Door, a counseling and referral center for women seeking abortions, on hiring staff:

“I confirmed that each counselor was pro-choice… I did not allow anybody to work with our clients who referred to a fetus as anything but in that neutral term [ the word ‘fetus’]. I recall arguing with an applicant who couldn’t understand that the term “baby” was not neutral and a value judgment in and of itself.”

Norma Goldberger Abortion Confidential: Secrets of an Abortion Clinic Owner (CreateSpace , November 23, 2014) Kindle Edition

Norma Goldberger, the director, eventually left Open Door to establish an abortion clinic, which she owned.

Share on Facebook