News service distorts truth about pro-life rescue

Randy C. Alcorn, who attended a pro-life rescue (a sit in at an abortion clinic) told the following story about the reporter who interviewed him.

“I was interviewed at one rescue by a newspaper reporter. We had talked at length, and I was pleased that all the rescuers were very calm and controlled, so he wouldn’t have any grounds for a sensational story and hopefully stick to the facts.

Later, however, one woman who was not with our group and did not come to rescue arrived on the scene and began shouting at the clinic personnel and one policeman. One of our leaders took her aside and begged her to stop. I immediately went to the same reporter and pointed out that the woman shouting was not with the group doing the rescue, and in fact we were actively trying to calm her down and get her off the premises. I specifically said, “Please don’t give the impression that she’s with us, because she isn’t.”

The article in the next morning’s paper focused on this woman and her shouting and name-calling. It left the definite impression that she was not only with our group, but representative of our behavior. This isolated 10 minute incident, totally uncharacteristic of the rest of the five hours we were there, became the major focus of the story. 500,000 readers would come away with a completely inaccurate impression of both the rescue and the rescuers.”

Randy C. Alcorn Is Rescuing Right? (Downers Grove, Illinois, Inter-Varsity Press, 1990) 134 – 135

Share on Facebook

Abortion clinic director on why women pay in advance

Laura Moody, director of abortion clinic Hope Clinic, on why they have women pay in advance:

“It’s the nature of the business. Unlike a family doctor, we don’t have a long-term relationship with the patient. They may have used an assumed name or a wrong address or phone number.”

They do not accept charge cards, only cash.

Scott Kraft “The Business is Abortion: And It’s a Big BusinessObserver-Reporter January 18, 1983

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choice author on abortions motivated by “care and protective concern”

Pro-Abortion author Leslie Cannold interviewed pro-choice women, and reported that they believed:

“An abortion decision that did not reflect a woman’s “feelings” and “love” for her could-be child and other significant people in her life, and that was not motivated by care and protective concern for all those she loves, was just plain wrong.”

Leslie Cannold The Abortion Myth (Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press, 1998)  xx

Below; Was this abortion motivated by “love” of the child?

new

Share on Facebook

Before birth, baby has 10 trillion cells

William M Connolly, who has studied embryology, says:

“Time–Life estimates the mature human body has 100 trillion cells. Scientists tell us each cell performs more than 1 trillion biochemical reactions per second. Before birth, the fetus has, perhaps, 10 trillion cells, plus it’s 10 to 100 billion nerve cells, each cell performing a trillion biochemical processes per second.”

William M Connolly One Life: How the US Supreme Court Deliberately Distorted the History, Science and Law of Abortion (Xlibris, 2002) 128

An embryo at 5 weeks
An embryo at 5 weeks
Share on Facebook

Abortion worker comments on Christian abortionists

One woman who aborts babies says:

“One of the things I’ve discovered, particularly in working in the southeast, is there are providers who identify themselves as Christian and actually bring their Christianity into the space of abortion. Some providers actually pray with individuals….”

ATTN Video, shared on Facebook March 10, 2018

These abortionists may pray with women while they are doing this to their babies:

9 weeks before abortion
9 weeks before abortion
9 weeks after abortion
9 weeks after abortion
Share on Facebook

Pro-Choicer: both abortion and abstinence are the same because they both “prevent” a baby

This pro-abortion/pro-choice activist believes that if abortion is wrong, abstaining from sex is also wrong, because either way, a baby will not be born.

“If two healthy, fertile people, very much in love but ignorant of the ways of contraception, are sexually active for a year or more, the probability that a child will be conceived is quite high. It follows that if the two remain chaste for that period of time, the probability that a potential child has been lost is equally high.

One can condemn abortion or the prevention of implantation because each results in the sure loss of a potential child, therefore, only if one is prepared to condemn chastity for the same reason. …

If those who tolerate abortion are said to trample on the rights of the unborn, then those who praise chastity may with equal justification be said to trample on the rights of the unconceived.”

David Randall Luce. “Potential Personhood and the Rights of the Unconceived.” Conscience (newsletter of Catholics for a Free Choice), July/August 1986 [Volume VII, Number 4], pages 2 to 5.

This person is divorced from reality. In chastity, a baby is not conceived. No baby exists. In abortion, the baby exists, and this is done to him or her:

10 weeks
10 weeks
Share on Facebook

Pro-Abortion activist: Abortion eliminates “child abusers, wife-beaters, and mass murderers”

A pro-abortion/pro-choice activist explains why she supports abortion:

“Lately the anti-choice protesters have argued that, in destroying a fetus, a potentially great mind may be destroyed — killing an Einstein or a Beethoven.

On the other hand, we might be sparing the world a Hitler or a mass murderer; this is a good deal more probable, for unwanted children rarely have happy lives or the kind of nurturing that produces great achievers. …

If there’s one thing this world doesn’t need, it’s more people — especially unhappy, maladjusted, abused people who grow up to be child abusers, wife-beaters, and sometimes mass murderers.”

Victoria Branden. “The Abortion Merry-Go-Round.” Humanist in Canada, Autumn 1989, pages 14 to 15.

Below: Did this child deserve to die because he could have grown up to be a mass murderer?

10 weeks
10 weeks
Share on Facebook

British abortionist comments on why National Health Service abortions are dangerous

British OBGYN Peter Diggory explains why more women suffer complications from abortions when abortions are performed by the National Health Service in England.

“Consultant gynecologists in the NHS [National Health Service] are invariably busy and have the responsibility for teaching technical expertise to their juniors: only rarely will they have the time and the interest to become good abortionists. In this context the paper reporting the highest level of complications I’ve ever read about was published from an academic unit of high repute.”

Abortion: Medical Progress and Social Implications, CIBA Foundation Symposium 115 (London: Pitman, 1985) 13

Share on Facebook

Planned Parenthood abortionist, fetus is “tough little object”

Susan Robinson, abortionist, at Planned Parenthood Mar Monte:

“The fetus is a tough little object, and taking it apart, I mean, taking it apart on day one is very difficult.”

She is referring to a D&E abortion, where the baby is dismembered with forceps (see diagram below)

de

 

Kristi Burton Brown “10 horrifying things Planned Parenthood says about abortion” Live Action News May 25, 2017

Share on Facebook

Abortionist talks about “stigma” of abortionists

A man who does some abortions explains why he does not want to be known as an “abortionist”:

“I hate doing [abortions], but I do them every once in a while. But the real reason we try to avoid them is that I don’t want to be known in the community as a local abortionist. I want to be known as a doctor who loves mommies and their babies. I don’t care what is said, there is a stigma attached to doing abortions. There are political reasons not to earn the reputation as the local abortionist, I mean to be known as the physician who performed abortions whenever asked.”

Jonathan B Imber Abortion and the Private Practice of Medicine (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986) 68

Share on Facebook