Pro-choicer: We Need More Abortion

mandatory ster

This lovely sentiment was expressed on Facebook by pro-choice supporter. He/she is not the only one who has suggested that people be forced to have permission to have children – many of the early supporters of Planned Parenthood felt this way.

Share on Facebook

Feminist Amanda Marcotte compares unborn babies to bacteria

Feminist Amanda Marcotte (Twitter):

“Taking antibiotics terminates more life than an abortion. One organism < the billions you kill with antibiotics.”

most abortions are done at this stage or later

If you can believe an embryo is greater than a woman, I can believe bacteria has a right to live.

….

I do love people who believe a fertilized egg is worth more than a woman scolding me for being pro-life for bacteria.

Source; Lifenews, 11/18/13

Share on Facebook

Morally Meaningful Life?

Is he “morally meaningful” life?

Abortionist and pro-choice advocate Dr. William Harrison:

“The real issue in the abortion debate today is not when life begins, but is it morally meaningful life.”

Mary Fischer, “A New Look at Life,” Reader’s Digest, October 2003, 95-103.

Of course, this doctor and most others in the medical field learned during their medical training that life begins at conception. Read some scientists and medical textbooks that say this here. 

Share on Facebook

Shortly after legalization, abortion in Chicago was: “highly profitable and very dangerous.”

Legalizing abortion did not necessarily make it safe. In fact, many of the illegal abortion provider simply hung up a shingle and became legal abortion providers. The situation was particularly bad in Chicago.

One reporter, Pam Zekman who wrote a series of exposés on the problems in Chicago abortion clinics, told Time magazine,

“In 1973, the Supreme Court legalized abortion. As it turns out, what they legalized in some clinics in Chicago is a highly profitable and very dangerous backroom abortion.”

Pamela Zekman “Risky Abortions: Chicago Clinics Are Exposed,” Time, November 27, 1978 and 52

The situation is not much better today – women still die from legal abortion.

 

Share on Facebook

Clarke D Forsythe describes at length why legal abortion deaths do not make it into CDC and other statistics

Clarke D Forsythe, in his excellent book Abuse of Discretion: the inside Story of Roe Versus Wade (buy the book on Amazon here) explains at length why legal abortion deaths and injuries do not make it into the published statistics.

“Abortion injuries and deaths are washed out of the US public health system through a series of filters. The first filter is the clinics. Clinics do not take responsibility for injuries if they can avoid it. Standard procedure for clinics is to tell a patient who suffers pain or bleeding to go to the nearest emergency room, not back to the clinic. Only 22 states – less than half – require reporting of complications, but, if they do, neither the clinic nor the ER is inclined to keep records and do so. If clinics urge women to go to the nearest ER, the clinics will not see the injury to report it.

The 2nd filter is the ER. The ER doctor may have no reason to suspect abortion or may simply report the presenting symptoms rather than the underlying cause. A 1992 medical journal study found that 50% of abortion patients conceal their abortions from the medical personnel who interview them about their medical history.”

(RK Jones and K Kost “Underreporting of Induced and Spontaneous Abortion in the United States: an Analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth,” Studies in Family Planning 38 (2007): 187 – 197)

Payment mechanisms are the 3rd filter. Most abortions performed in the United States are currently paid for in cash. (Only 13% of women use their private insurance for abortion coverage: 74% pay out-of-pocket. Rachel Laser on the Diane Rehms Show, October 5, 2009)

There is no submission of the procedure to a third-party payer and no financial record of the transaction.

Coding procedures are the 4th filter. Even if an ER doctor suspects an induced abortion, coding procedures actually give an ER doctor a financial incentive to report the women’s condition as caused by something else, such as embolism, sepsis, or cardiomyopathy. The ER doctor will be paid more if the ER doctor submits the billing as “treatment for septic shock” rather than “abortion.” Or, given the emotional discomfort associated with abortion, medical personnel might choose an alternative cause to protect the privacy of an abortion patient.

The ER doctor will most likely use codes for fever, abdominal pain, and sepsis to report to the patient’s insurance company, because they do not want to risk the claim being denied because it was related to complications of an elective abortion.

Abortions billed to insurance companies in the United States are billed according to coding requirements (current procedural technology or CPT codes) The CPT codes are created and controlled (by patent) by the American Medical Association. The CPT codes must be linked with an international classification of disease (ICD) code. The ICD codes are controlled by the World Health Organization (WHO). Here are the ICD – 9 codes for abortion complications:

639 .1: Delayed or excessive hemorrhage following abortion, or eptopic and molar pregnancies

639.2 Damage to pelvic organs and tissues following abortion or ectopic and molar pregnancies

639.3 Renal failure following abortion or eptopic and molar pregnancies

639.4 Metabolic disorder following an abortion or eptopic and molar Pregnancies

639.5 Shock following abortion or eptopic and molar pregnancies

639.6 Embolism following abortion or eptopic and molar pregnancies

639.8 Other specified convocations following abortion or eptopic and molar pregnancies

639.9 Unspecified complication following abortion or eptopic and molar pregnancy

The ICD – 9 codes (the current version used in the United States) lump for different events together: spontaneous abortion, elective abortion, ectopic pregnancy, and molar pregnancy. The ICD – 9 codes make it impossible to specifically linked a complication to elective abortion.

The 5th filter is unreliable death certificates. The Federal Bureau of Vital Statistics (B VS) formulates a national death certificate form, which serves as a template for states in creating their own form. The national form omits any history of prior spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) or elective induced abortions. Yet this would be important information to gather in order to analyze data on prior pregnancy history and pregnancy outcome. In addition, the doctor who might certify an abortion death is typically not the one who originally treated the woman. Death certificates are often inaccurate by as much as 30 – 40%. Abortion statistician Willard Cates, Jr., and his colleagues found that “inadequate physician documentation on the death certificate” occurs in about 40% of abortion related deaths.”

(Willard Cates Jr, Jack C Smith, Roger W Rochat, et al. “Assessment of Surveillance and Vital Statistics Data for Monitoring Abortion Mortality, United States, 1972 – 1975” American Journal of epidemiology 108 (September 1978); 204)

The 6th filter is birth certificates. The BVS is also complicit in avoiding any data collection that could link maternal abortion history to adverse pregnancy outcome. During the 1990s, a federal representative from the BVS met with an ACOG committee to review the recommended national birth certificate forms, which served as a template by which states could create their own birth certificates. Notably absent from the form was any history of the mother’s prior spontaneous or elective abortions, and the committee immediately recognize the omission and recommended that this information be included, since it is important information to gather in order to analyze data on prior pregnancy history and subsequent pregnancy outcome and assess women’s health. But the representative from the B VS stated that the federal government did not want to collect any data that might link abortion history to adverse pregnancy outcome, and that there was pressure from Congress to not collect this data; hence, it would not be on the birth certificate data form. The B VS birth certificate recommendations have excluded any reference to prior abortions.

All of the prior filters may make it clear why the 7th filter is haphazard data collection. The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta has been charged by federal law since 1969 with keeping track of the annual numbers of abortion and keeping track of abortion mortality and morbidity.

The CDC does this through its Abortion Surveillance program; this data is published in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), which covers reasons for death and disease, including abortion. The abortion data that is reported to the CDC comes not from clinics or practitioners but from the states, the states get the data to the CDC voluntarily. Not all states give their data to the CDC; for example, California – which accounts for ¼ to 1 3rd of all abortions the United States – has not reported data to the CDC for several years.… Given the fact that several states do not report abortions to the CDC, neither the total number of annual abortions or the number of deaths can be accurate…

State collection of data is hit or miss. In June 2011, the Chicago Tribune reported that “state abortion records [were] full of gaps” and that “thousands of procedures” and 6 deaths were not reported to the state health department.

(Megan Twohey, “State Abortion Reports Full of Recording Gaps” Chicago Tribune, June 16, 2011 at C1)

It is not surprising that the CDC conceded in 1992 that “data of the AGI [Alan Guttmacher Inst.] demonstrated significantly more abortions each year” that the CDC reported.”

American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs. “Induced Termination of Pregnancy before and after Roe V Wade: Trends in the Mortality and Morbidity of Women” Journal of the American Medical Association 268 (1992): 3231 – 3239

Clarke D Forsythe Abuse of Discretion: the inside Story of Roe Versus Wade (New York: Encounter Books, 2013) 235 – 241

 

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choice writer says why she would have an abortion

Some lovely words from one pro-choicer:

“I don’t particularly like babies. They are loud and smelly and, above all other things, demanding. No matter how much free day care you throw at women, babies are still time-sucking monsters with their constant neediness. ….

aboted at 15 weeks

No matter how flexible you make my work schedule, my entire life would be overturned by a baby. I like  my life how it is, with my ability to do what I want when I want without having to arrange for a babysitter. I like being able to watch True Detective right now and not wait until baby is in bed. I like sex in any room of the house I please. I don’t want a baby. I’ve heard your pro-baby arguments. Glad those work for you, but they are unconvincing to me. Nothing will make me want a baby.”

aborted at 10 weeks

“Adoption? Fuck you, seriously. I am not turning my body over for nine months of gaining weight and puking and being tired and suffering and not being able to sleep on my side and going to the hospital for a bout of misery and pain so that some couple I don’t know and probably don’t even like can have a baby. I don’t owe that couple a free couch to sleep on while they come to my city to check out the local orphans, so I sure as shit don’t own them my body. I like drinking alcohol and eating soft cheese. I like not having a giant growth protruding out of my stomach. I hate hospitals and like not having stretch marks.”

aborted at 11 weeks

….

This is why, if my birth control fails, I am totally having an abortion. Given the choice between living my life how I please and having my body within my control and the fate of a lentil-sized, brainless embryo that has half a chance of dying on its own anyway, I choose me.

Amanda Marcotte “The Real Debate Isn’t About “Life” But About What We Expect Of Women” Pandagon March 14, 2014

aborted at 7 weeks
abortion at 7 weeks
Share on Facebook

Dr. William Rashbaum dismembers 18-week-old baby – mother concerned about baby’s pain

Dr. William Rashbaum was a late-term abortionist who performed over 20,000 late-term abortions are taught over 100 doctors how to do these procedures. In an article about him, the author describes a woman who came into abort her pregnancy at 18 weeks. She was aborting because the baby was going to be handicapped. From the author:

18 weeks

“She’s not sure she wants to know the details. It’s difficult to relinquish her role of protecting a fetus that has grown inside her for four and a half months. Welling up with tears again, she asks if it will feel pain. She doesn’t want to hear much more. “I just want to make sure you get all of it out,” she pleads. “Don’t leave anything in there.”….

REBECCA PALEY “Cruel to be kind: In the twilight of his career, a late-term-abortion doctor tells all” The Boston Phoenix  Dec 2003

Dr. Raushbaum killed her baby by the D&E abortion method. Here is a chart that shows how that type of abortion is performed

From a D&E at 18 weeks:

Share on Facebook

Dr. William Rashbaum, late term abortionist: “I enjoy what I do.”

Dr. William Rashbaum, now deceased, was profiled in a 2003 article. At the time the article was written, he had  performed over 21,000 late-term abortions. The article says of Raushbaum:

24 weeks – this baby would be dismembered in the type of abortion that Doctor Raushbaum performed

TRAINED IN an era when doctors were considered gods, Rashbaum is gruff, confrontational, and downright abrasive. He flaunts medical conventions at will, rankling nurses and orderlies, if it serves his needs. When the orderlies take too long preparing his operating room between procedures, he goes in and embarrasses them into efficiency by helping to clean up. He boasts, “They turn my room over much faster than any other room.” First- and second-year OB/GYN residents dread his cases. “It was always a fight about who had to do them,” says a former intern.

From a D&E abortion at 21 weeks

Cases such as his are certainly the most technically difficult of all abortions. As pregnancy moves closer to 24 weeks (the upper legal limit in most states, with rare exceptions made to preserve a woman’s life or health), the risk to the patient increases, even with the preferred method for second-trimester abortions — dilation and evacuation, or D&E for short. During the procedure, in which both vacuum and surgical instruments are used, the fetus is either removed in pieces or delivered more or less intact. In the operating room, Rashbaum readily yells at the top of his lungs at residents working with forceps inside a woman’s uterus, where he can’t see what they’re doing, to make sure they are as nervous as he is. “It’s not the best way to teach,” he admits. “Calm, cool, collected is better, but a tough screaming is not ineffective.”

The article also quotes Raushbaum as saying:

“As long as I can make a contribution, I enjoy what I do.”

The article also says:

He has trained close to 100 doctors to do D&Es, some of whom have gone on to train others

REBECCA PALEY “Cruel to be kind: In the twilight of his career, a late-term-abortion doctor tells all” The Boston Phoenix  Dec 2003

Share on Facebook

Pro-choice advice on debating: avoid questions of when life begins

From a pro-choice publication on debating the abortion issue:

The [pro-life] opposition will hammer away at life and murder themes —matters of theology and faith, rather than fact and reason. Dispose of these as quickly as possible (avoid the “When does life begin?” discussion) …

Looseleaf workbook “Organizing for Action.” National Abortion Rights Action League, 1974, page 31. “Introduction to Debating.”

The evidence is overwhelming that life begins at conception, so it is not surprising that experienced pro-choice activists know they cannot win that debate.

Unborn baby at 7 weeks
Share on Facebook

Clinic has difficulty hiring staff

There is a shortage of abortion doctors in America today. For example, one Planned Parenthood worker explained how her clinic had a hard time finding medical staff:.

“Piercy said the All Women’s clinic has had some financial struggles. It has had to bring in a doctor from Portland to perform abortions and had trouble hiring a medical director, she said.”

Kitty Piercy, spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood Health Services of Southwest Oregon, based in Eugene.

TIM CHRISTIE “Clinic’s shutdown leaves void” The Register Guard (Eugene, OR) July 18, 2002

Share on Facebook