They said it.
Abortionist Martin Haskell originated the D&X (partial birth) procedure because:
“… most surgeons find dismemberment [i.e., D&E] at twenty weeks and beyond to be difficult due to the toughness of fetal tissues at this stage of development.”
Martin Haskell, M.D. “Dilatation and Extraction for Late Second Trimester Abortion.” National Abortion Federation conference proceedings Second Trimester Abortion: From Every Angle, September 13-14, 1992, Dallas, Texas
Share on Facebook
“They [the aborted babies] were next to the garbage cans in paper buckets, like the take home chicken kind. I looked inside the bucket in front of me. There was a small, naked person in there, floating in bloody liquid.”
Clinic worker Susan Lindstrom, MSW
Magda Denes, PhD “Performing Abortions” Commentary Oct 1976 35- 37
Dr. Martin Haskell says he has qualms about third trimester abortions
“only for technical reasons, not for emotional reasons of fetal development. I think it’s important to distinguish the two.”
Dr. Haskell performs abortions up to 25 weeks and later. He says that 80% of them are elective (not health related)
Diane Gianelli “Shock Tactic Ads Target Late-Term Abortion Procedure” American Medical Association News July 5, 1993.
From former clinic worker Jewels Green:
“ For anyone familiar with what goes on with human remains after an abortion, foot length is quite important. Measuring the foot of the deceased is the most accurate way to determine fetal age post-mortem. Tiny feet were measured beside me more times than I can count. Measuring tiny feet was how abortion facilities matched pre-abortion estimates of fetal age with the reality after death. The age determined by the measurement of the tiny feet was the age put on the forms that I completed for the state Department of Health abortion statistics.”
JEWELS GREEN “Supporting barbaric late-term abortions: why there can be no dissension in the pro-abortion ranks” LifeSiteNews Jun 27, 2013
Share on FacebookTHE COURT: “If you are doing an intact D&E…that entailed a partial delivery, and then the procedure you described of inserting the scissors into the base of the skull and using a suction device to remove the brain.”
THE WITNESS: “Yes”
Testimony of abortionist Dr Amos Grunebaum, National Abortion Federation, et. al. v. Ashcroft, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, March 30, 2004.
Share on Facebook
The earlier the pregnancy the more fragile the fetus. So, grasping a fetus early on is more likely to tear it and less likely to allow you to bring it out whole.
Dr. Gerson Weiss, abortionist, in sworn testimony in National Abortion Federation, et. al. v. Ashcroft, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, April 7, 2004
“The friction causes the fetus to tear apart. For example, a leg might be ripped off the fetus as it is pulled through the cervix.”
US Supreme Court, Gonzales vs. Carhart, April 18, 2007, describing the D&E procedure, which is legal
Learn more about about a D&E procedure here
“Have you ever seen one? . . I don’t care what anyone say, it is not a tonsillectomy, not just any old medical procedure. It’s terminating a potential human life.” –
David Zbaraz, abortionist, quoted from “Abortionist: Doctor Joins Suit for Right to Do Operation He Hates”, Washington Post, March 3, 1980.
Below; an abortion performed at seven weeks
You can count there is a limb here, I can see feet and hands, I can see skull fragments, I can see trunk.
Dr. Gerson Weiss, abortionist, in sworn testimony in National Abortion Federation, et. al. v. Ashcroft, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, April 7, 2004
The fetus has a tiny face and a relatively large head. The bones of the back of the skull are very soft. When we make an incision in the base of the skull, we don’t disturb any of the skin covering the entire skull, we don’t disturb the scalp. So the top and back of the head itself just collapses and looks a little wrinkly and collapsed, but the facial structures are not disturbed at all by that procedure.
Dr. Carolyn Westhoff, abortionist, in sworn testimony in National Abortion Federation, et. al. v. Ashcroft, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, April 2, 2004
Share on Facebook