Pro-Choice Author Laments Unborn Baby Pictures

From pro-choice author Melody Rose:

12 weeks sonogram

“The images and language most often wielded by pro-life advocates are vivid and emotional… recent developments in imaging technique certainly have facilitated a reliance on powerful pictures that humanize the fetus in a way not possible two decades ago. Because fetuses now can be seen in intricate detail, opponents of abortion have striking images to use in support of abortion restrictions, despite what these restrictions might mean to women’s health and freedom.”

Melody Rose “Safe, Legal and Unavailable? Abortion Politics in the United States” (Washington DC: CQ Press) 2007 p 10 to 11

 

Share on Facebook

If Wombs Had Windows…

Former abortionist Dr. Bernard Nathanson, in his book Aborting America, acknowledged how seeing unborn babies has a powerful impact on people when he said:

“Fewer women would have abortions if wombs had windows.”

Aborting America (Life Cycle Books (June 1979)

sonogram of 8-week-old baby in the womb
Share on Facebook

Picture of Unborn Baby Upsets Pro-Choicers

From an article by pro-abortion activist Jason Deparle:

“In 1985 the North Carolina Independent, a biweekly alternative paper with a history of support for left liberal and feminist causes, put a fetus on the front page, labeled with the blandest caption: “Controversial, magnified images like this one… are credited with winning converts to the antiabortion camp.”

“The phone calls and letters poured in,” said Katherine Fulton, the paper’s editor. “It was perceived as antifeminist.” The graphic seemed like “the other side image. We didn’t coach it enough.”

8 week unborn baby – a picture similar to the one newspaper

From the same article:

In 1985 [The Progressive] ran an advertisement from a group called Feminists for Life [it] pictured an embryo at eight weeks. The Funding Exchange, a New York philanthropy that had supported the magazine, wrote to say that it was “greatly offended” was canceling its subscription, and would henceforth “find it difficult for our staff to lobby for funding for your publication.” Michael Ratner, of the Center for Constitutional Rights, a civil liberties group, weighed in as well:

“Happily I am not a subscriber so I needn’t cancel my subscription,” he wrote, “I would surely do so after seeing this antiabortion ad.”

Jason Deparle “Beyond the Legal Right: Why Liberals and Feminists Don’t like to Talk about the Morality of Abortion” Washington Monthly, April 1989

Deparle goes on to say:

“It’s not surprising that the defenders of abortion don’t like pictures of fetuses; General Westmoreland didn’t like the cameras in Vietnam either. Fetuses aren’t babies, and the photos don’t end the discussion. But they make it a more sober one, as it should be.”

 

Share on Facebook

Picture of Aborted Baby Helps Prosecutors Convict Abortionist

Another example of how effective these pictures are, when Kenneth Edelin killed a 23 week old baby who was born alive after an abortion he performed, the jury that convicted him said that the reason they found him guilty was the pictures the prosecution showed of the dead child:

From an article covering the trial:

“Several of the jurors who convicted Edlin of manslaughter said it was the photographic evidence that convinced them.

“It looked like a baby,” said juror Liberty Ann Conlin “I’m not speaking for the rest of the jurors, but it definitely had an effect on me.”

Another juror, Paul A. Hollan, “The picture helped people draw their own conclusions. Everybody in the room made up their minds but the fetus was a person.”

(St Lois Globe-Democrat feb 18 1975)

….

Pro-choice author Maureen Faux said of the case:

“The case was lost in part because, over the defense’s strenuous objections, the prosecution was able to display a larger-than-life-size photograph of the fetus, which had been preserved as evidence.”

Marian Faux Crusaders: Voices from the Abortion Front (New York: Carol Publishing Group) 1990 P 4

The verdict was later overturned.

Share on Facebook

Legal Abortion Death: “Adelle,” 26 (Possible Medication Overdose)

A woman identified as “Patient A” (I’ll call her “Adelle”), was 26 years old and had a history of anemia and sickle cell disease. Her abortionist, Mi Yong Kim, did not order proper lab studies, document an appropriate history, or perform a proper exam on Adelle before performing a safe and legal abortion on her on November 16, 2002.

Kim administered 25 mg of Versed to Adelle, in response to her reports of pain, over a 10-minute period, without giving the medicine time to take effect.

Kim told the medical board that she did not give Adelle any analgesia for pain because she gives enough Versed to cause amnesia so that the patient can’t remember the pain. The board noted that Kim lacked judgment and knowledge of intravenous conscious sedation and that she was not fit to supervise a CRNA.

At the end of the abortion, Kim noted that Adelle’s pulse oximeter reading was only 70%, an alarming finding. Kim thought she found a pulse, did not assess whether or not Adelle was breathing, and simply ordered her staff to give Adelle oxygen by mask and call 911.

Kim administered Romazicon to reverse the effects of the Versed, but did not notice that Adelle had gone into cardiac arrest. As such, Kim made no effort to resuscitate her. The ambulance crew arrived and transported Adelle to the hospital, where she was declared dead from possible air embolism.

The medical board noted that Kim was not certified in Advanced Cardiopulmonary Life Support, nor was she or anybody else on her staff qualified to perform an intubation or use crash cart equipment. Kim did not document the operative report for Adelle. Kim told the board that the police had told her not to make any further notes in her file.

The board did not suspend or yank Kim’s license, instead noting that she was making improvements in her quality of care. She was instead placed under stipulations regarding her use of anesthesia in her office and her record-keeping.

Kim called her office “Landmark Women’s Center”, giving the impression that it was a clinic.

Credit: Christina Dunigan

Share on Facebook

The Impact of Drawings on the Partial-Birth Abortion Debate

During the trials about the partial birth abortion ban, president of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers Ron Fitzsimmons said this of the pictures (drawings of how the baby is killed in this type of abortion) shown by supporters of the ban:

“They’d be talking, talking, talking, and every few minutes, they’d say, “Mr. Speaker, let me just once again describe this horrific procedure for you.” I swear, I thought the debate occurred every night between five and six p.m., when people were coming home. They did exactly what I would have done – they brought out those pictures. And I was just thinking: who’s going to go out there and defend this?”

Cynthia Gorney “Gambling with Abortion: Why Both Sides Think They Have Everything to Lose” Harper’s Magazine, Nov 2004

 

Share on Facebook

Legal Abortion Death: Rhonda Rollinson (Uterine Perforation and Infection)

Rhonda Rollinson underwent a safe, legal abortion by Dr. Jay I. Levin at Malcom Polis’s Philadelphia Women’s Center September 3, 1992. The abortion attempt was unsuccessful. Rhonda was then sent home, with instructions to return on September 12 to try again.

Rhonda experienced such severe pain, dizziness, fever, and discharge that on September 10 she sought emergency care at a hospital. She was suffering “severe non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema consistent with adult respiratory distress syndrome.”

Doctors did a laparoscopy, dilation and evacuation, abdominal hysterectomy, and splenectomy, to no avail. Rhonda died on September 14. The autopsy revealed a perforation from her vagina into the uterine cavity, sepsis, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis, pulmonary infarctions, and dysplastic kidney.

The suit filed by Rhonda’s survivors also charged the facility and Polis with hiring Levin despite his lack of competence, failure to properly supervise his work, violation of applicable laws and regulations, lack of informed consent, failure to give proper post-operative instructions, and failure “to respond to the requests of [Rhonda] and her family for post-operative medical advice.”

Source: Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 291, 1994

Credit: Christina Dunigan

Share on Facebook

Rev. Howard Moody and Abortion Pictures

Rev Howard Moody, head of a group of thousands of clergymen who referred women for abortions, both before and after it was legal, said that he lost many clergy because of the pictures.

(Don Sloan, M.D. and Paula Hartz. Choice: A Doctor’s Experience with the Abortion Dilemma. New York: International Publishers 2002)

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choice Activists Instructed To Censor Images

A pro-choice Looseleaf booklet entitled “Organizing for Action.” instructs young pro-choice activists how to win over converts to the pro-choice cause:

“Another set of questions involves the opposition. Has your audience seen anti-abortion propaganda? Are you debating a Right-to-Lifer? Is the opposition bringing slides or pictures? Try to insist that they not be allowed to … Find out if your opposition is bringing audio-visuals. Try to insist that you will only speak if they do not … Explain that you are equally repulsed by the [pro-life] photos, that you are human and love children and babies as much as anyone else … The pictures they [the audience] have seen must be discredited. They have been magnified so much as to remove the facts from scientific perspective. Really, in early stages, the fetus is smaller than a fingernail, can fit into a walnut shell, and is much like menstrual flow to the naked eye. We would be repulsed by a magnified picture of an eyeball in formaldehyde also.”

This was cited in American Life League: Pro-Life Encyclopedia Chapter 61: Methodology and Aspects of Abortion

Share on Facebook

Legal Abortion Death: Allegra Roseberry, 41 (Infection/Sepsis)

Allegra Roseberry, age 41, had been diagnosed with terminal liver cancer. Allegra was admitted to Emory Hospital for assessment and surgery in anticipation of admission to an experimental cancer treatment program. There, a sonogram during surgery revealed a 23-week pregnancy, much to everyone’s surprise since Allegra had undergone fertility drug treatment in order to conceive her son Matthew 20 years earlier.

Her liver specialist, family doctor, and gynecologist all failed to detect her pregnancy despite amenorrhea, breast tenderness, distended abdomen, and nausea because these symptoms were attributed to the cancer and other ailments.

Allegra’s doctors offered abortion as her only alternative, saying that the fetus was “doomed” due to Allegra’s ailments, that the pregnancy would render her ineligible for the experimental treatment, and that the pregnancy was damaging her fragile health and would greatly hasten her death. No one arranged for a consult with a perinatologist or a high-risk obstetrician. The options of continuing the pregnancy and/or premature delivery of the infant were not offered or discussed.

Allegra was transferred to Emory’s Crawford Long Hospital for the abortion. Young W. Ahn initiated the abortion by prostaglandin suppository on August 8, 1988. On August 9, Allegra expelled the dead baby, whom she and her husband named Amy Ann.

Allegra developed sepsis from the abortion, and died on August 13. An autopsy revealed that Amy had been normal. The liver specialist contended that Allegra would have aborted Amy even if she had known the child was healthy in order to be eligible for the experimental program. Allegra’s gynecologist claimed that the reason for the abortion was damage to the fetus due to radiation therapy and also mentioned chemotherapy, neither of which Allegra had undergone. All defendants held that Allegra could not have survived long enough to deliver Amy alive anyway. The jury rendered a verdict against the liver specialist for the wrongful death of baby Amy, but returned no verdict for the wrongful death of Allegra due to their assumption that the cancer would have killed her soon anyway. Evidently they did not consider the time she could have spent being a mother to her baby daughter to be of any value.

Allegra’s was not the only tragic death caused by doctors who recommended (or excused) abortion as a life-saving or health-preserving option for the mother:

* Anjelica Duarte sought an abortion on the advice of her physician, and ended up dying under the care of a quack.
* Barbara Hoppert died after an abortion recommended due to a congenital heart problem.
* Christin Gilbert died after an abortion George Tiller holds was justified on grounds of maternal health.
* Erika Peterson died in 1961 when her doctors obtained her husband’s permission to perform a “therapeutic” abortion.
* “Molly” Roe died in 1975 when her doctors made the dubious decision to perform a saline abortion to improve her chances of surviving a lupus crisis.

Source: DeKalb County State Court Civil Action File No. 90A 18136

Credit: Christina Dunigan

Share on Facebook