Pregnant woman enjoys her “fetus shower”; A prolife rebuttal

The following is from a letter to the editor from the Washington Post. The writer is responding to another letter which criticized the Washington Post for using the term “baby” instead of “fetus” in a story about fetal surgery to correct health problems and unborn babies.

Kerry Haslam of Alexandria says:

I understand his indignation. While I was pregnant, I searched desperately at the store for the section of clothes for women accommodating a parasitic womb inhabitant. Oddly, I found only the “maternity” section.

Other events during my pregnancy were puzzling as well – when the doctor found the heartbeat, I convinced myself that it was simply a mass of tissue beating in a rhythmic fashion.

One night, while I was resting on the couch, a little foot-like impression appeared on my belly, from the inside out. I dismissed that; it simply had to be intestinal.

My friends and I enjoyed cupcakes and tea for my “fetus shower”; what a joyous occasion.

Goodness, all during the pregnancy, I just loved my little ba-, I mean, fetus.

“The correct term is indeed ‘babies’ WP Opinions February 18, 2011 found here. 

 

Share on Facebook

Author: Sarah

Sarah Terzo is a pro-life writer and blogger. She is on the board of The Consistent Life Network and PLAGAL +

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

seven + three =