Actor Jack Nicholson on Abortion

Share on Facebook

Former Clinic Worker Describes Women Using Abortions As “Birth Control”

One former clinic worker made the following comments in personal correspondence with the webmaster of clinicquotes:

When I first started out nursing in the late 70’s I was working for the Ob/Gyn physicians in this hospital. My duties were not only to care for those that were in for abortions, I also cared for the older folks having hysterectomies and so forth. I didn’t have a personal opinion on abortion until I saw how many were done and for the multitude of ridiculous reasons. Not to mention the actual procedure itself and the “aftermath”. It wasn’t until a few years afterwards that I started to feel this wasn’t right. That is when I transferred to a different department and hospital completely. . . Plus you must understand, I worked for a hospital smack dab in the middle of NYC, I got to know some of the girls getting these abortions on a first name basis, since they had them so often. That really got under my skin, seeing these girls using it as a birth control measure. And why shouldn’t they? The state paid for it anyway! Just not right!

 

Share on Facebook

Woman Conceived in Rape Speaks out

Julie Makimaa of Holland, Michigan was conceived in rape and born in 1964.  She discovered this  21 years later when she met her birth mother. She researched and helped write the  book Victims and Victors, about women who became pregnant as a result of rape:

Excerpts from her Capital Hill Briefing:

“An overwhelming number of Americans feel abortion should be allowed for rape and incest. But the information that shapes their views is very one- sided. It presents abortion as the only solution, and that solution is presented without question.

Many pro-lifers have been convinced we need an exception to the right to life for rape and incest. We somehow believe the sacrifice of a few in rape and incest is the price we have to pay to obtain protections for the majority.

The ACLU, in the late 60s and early 70s, searched for rape victims who’d be willing to challenge the laws prohibiting abortion. They were unable to find a rape victim, but they did find Norma McCorvey, who became Jane Roe of Roe vs Wade, who claimed she was a victim of a gang rape by three men and a woman. It wasn’t until many years afterwards that Norma revealed that was a lie. Sarah Weddington  and Linda Coffee, her attorney, needed an extreme case to make her look pitiable. Rape seemed to be the ticket. 

We’ve heard women should not be forced to carry a rapist’s child, that a pregnancy would create unbearable psychological trauma, that the child would be a constant reminded of her rape.

The child is described as less valuable than the rest of us. The children will suffer physical and psychological deformities. Male children will be rapists. They will be criminals. Children carry the evil genes of their fathers. They will never love, never contribute to society, . They will never have normal lives. This is the way the majority of Americans view rape and incest pregnancies.

Out of 164 women who carried to term, 64% of them are raising their own children. These women grew to love their child. They didn’t view it as the evil rapist’s child. They grew to love it as their child.

Of the 28 girls pregnant through incest, 50% of them carried to term. Of these, 50%, 60% are raising their children.

The woman who is pregnant though incest typically is forced into abortion to hide what is going on. The family members are taking her to an abortion clinic because they don’t want to be discovered and she’s put back into the abuse. People forget that for a lot of young girls, the pregnancy is finally the way out, the proof where someone else is brought in and pulls her out of that situation.

Women who carried their children to term grew to love their children, a bond was established with their child. They were victims in the assault, but they chose a higher path. They said “I was a victim, but I want to do something good” to redeem what happened to them, the pain they suffered.

They told us over and over again the most difficult part was the pregnancy but in the years that followed they felt good about the decision they made. They had a child or they released a child for adoption. They gave life to someone who many said shouldn’t be here, shouldn’t be born. But they felt there was some purpose to this life. 

[Of the] women who chose abortion, the incest victims were taken by their families to abortion clinics. There was no real choice in that. Because of the reaction of their families, they felt they could not even suggest or voice their feelings for this child. If they said “What if I want to carry this child to term?” people reacted by saying, “What? You love this rapist’s child?” they said the effects of the abortion caused greater trauma than the assault.

The woman who has been a victim will suffer pain. There are days when she won’t want to carry this child to term. But these women over and over have said “Knowing what I know now giving life was a good decision.”

Share on Facebook

Planned Parenthood: Catholic Church Waging a “War on Women”

Planned Parenthood claims that the Catholic Church is waging a “war on women” by fighting against abortion:

“The opinion and actions of the Holy See in regard to sexual and reproductive health and  rights are seen by many as a kind of war, a war that contributes to the suffering and deaths of millions of innocent people, a war not conducted with guns and fire but with condemnation and psychological torture.

“Planned Parenthood Says Vatican Waging War on Women” EWTN news brief Jun 27, 2000

baby aborted at 12 weeks – is opposing this engaging in a “war on women”?

 

Share on Facebook

NAF: Allow Dangerous Doctors to Practice Because “We Don’t Want Bad Press”

“We do have bad practitioners. And it’s affecting all of us. And we have been reluctant to do anything or say anything or whatever because of the physician shortage. We don’t want bad press, but when something happens, under our breaths we all say, ‘Well, it was just a matter of time.'”

National Abortion Federation Risk Management Seminar participant September 1994

Share on Facebook

Even Some Abortion-Rights Activists Are Uneasy with Late-Term Abortions

On late term abortions:

20 weeks

Even abortion-rights advocates are beginning to say that late abortions pose special problems. Compared with early abortions, post-20-week procedures are four times more costly, seven times more likely to lead to medical complications, and far more physically and emotionally traumatic to the woman. In recognition of these problems, more and more clinics are offering counseling before the abortion. “I don’t want laws to stop abortion at 20 weeks,” says Charlotte Taft, an abortion counselor and consultant in Santa Fe, N.M. “But I’d like us to consider how we, as a society, can take responsibility for the denial and ambivalence” that lead to late abortions.

Lavelle, Marianne, Glastris, Paul, Gerson, Michael J., Daniel, Missy, Meyer, Michele “When abortions come late in a pregnancy” U.S. News & World Report, 00415537, 01/19/98, Vol. 124, Issue 2

Share on Facebook

Majority of Late Abortions Not For Medical Reasons

Pro-choice writer Katha Pollitt, writing in The Nation, discusses reasons why women get late term (second trimester or later) abortions. The majority are NOT done because of maternal health or defect in the baby. Here are the statistics from 2003:

18 weeks

71% didn’t realize she was pregnant

48% difficulty making arrangements

33% afraid of telling parents or partner

A little less than 2% of all abortions take place after 20 weeks…this still adds up to thousands a year.

Katha Pollitt “In the Waiting Room” The Nation  April 21, 2003

 

 

Share on Facebook

WAGA-TV: Pro-Life Commercial “Offensive”

In Atlanta Georgia, a U.S. District Court ruled that WAGA-TV could refuse to air a four minute pro-life commercial. The commercial showed footage of aborted babies. According to the Court in Gillet Communications vs Becker, 1992, the commercial was “patently offensive”:

“It [the commercial] contains graphic depictions and descriptions of….the uterus, excreted uterine fluid, dismembered fetal body parts, and aborted fetuses.”

The commercial, which was intended to be aired only after midnight so that children would not see it, was never shown. Would there be the same outcry at depictions of another surgical procedure?

(Gillett Communications v. Becker, 1992, p. 763).    

 

Share on Facebook

George Tiller Admitted he Killed a “Baby”

Dr. George Tiller, handing a photo of a dead late-term fetus he had aborted to pro-choice legislator Ruby Gilbert during a tour of his late-term abortion clinic:

“This baby looks pretty good, I’m sorry that the baby had a lot of problems. But it did.”

“Tours provide insight into abortion”, The Wichita Eagle, October 7, 1997

On his website, Tiller used the word “baby” 13 times.

Share on Facebook

Embryo is “Human Life” But Abortion is Still OK

Ann Furedi, the chief executive of the largest independent abortion provider in the UK, said this in a 2008 debate:

“We can accept that the embryo is a living thing in the fact that it has a beating heart, that it has its own genetic system within it. It’s clearly human in the sense that it’s not a gerbil, and we can recognize that it is human life… the point is not when does human life begin, but when does it really begin to matter?”

Ann Furedi, “Abortion: A Civilized Debate,” Battle of Ideas, (London, England, November 1, 2008).

Share on Facebook