Post-abortion woman: You’re Pro-life, but Will You Help Me?

A letter a crisis pregnancy received from a young woman:

“My abortion is something I wish I had never done. I can remember looking at the doctor when it was done, and saw him putting my baby in a plastic bag and then, throwing it away in a garbage bag. Do you know how that feels?… Have you ever lost something you loved dearly? I did, and I’m not proud of it… If I had a place to go and people who cared about my baby and me, maybe my baby would be born and alive… You people are against abortion, but are you willing to help young girls and women who don’t have the money or a place to live?… Some of us women and girls are not killers. We’re human too. And I tell you, having an abortion is killing me slowly.”

Quoted in Paul B Fowler Abortion: Toward an Evangelical Consensus (Portland, Oregon: Multnomah Press, 1987) 167 – 168

The pro-life answer to this heartbroken woman’s question should ALWAYS be yes.  Give to crisis pregnancy centers as well as charities that help the poor.  Many poor people are single mothers who are at rick for abortion if they get pregnant again. No one should abort because they have no where to go.

Share on Facebook

When in pregnancy should abortion be allowed?

Professor of theology and ethics at Fuller Theological Seminary (as of 1987) Lewis B Smedes believed that abortion was okay through the 6th week of pregnancy:

“Abortion should be legally permitted during the first 6 weeks of pregnancy. Since no one can reasonably be sure that the fetus is a person at that time.

Abortion should be severely restricted after the first 6 weeks, and through the 12th week, serious defects cannot be found until the 12th week.

Abortion after the 3rd month should be a crime, since by that time a fetus has obviously developed into a functioning human body like a person.”

Lewis B Smedes, Mere Morality (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1983),  143 – 144

Smedes’s distinctions become questionable when we actually look at unborn babies at different stages. What is the exact moment that it becomes wrong to abort a baby after six weeks?

Unborn baby at only 5 to 6 weeks
Unborn baby at only 5 to 6 weeks

The baby above is okay to abort, according to Smedes. The baby below is not okay to abort.

6 weeks
6 1/2weeks

The cutoff point of six weeks is an arbitrary distinction picked out of thin air. No earth shattering changes in development happens between six weeks and six days and seven weeks. So many other stages given for when abortion should become illegal are also arbitrary. For example, many people say that abortion should be legal in the first trimester, the first three months, and not afterwards. Here are an unborn baby’s legs at 11 weeks

11 week legs
11 week legs

And here are a baby’s legs at 12

Legs of an unborn baby at 12 weeks
Legs of an unborn baby at 12 weeks

So some people think those babies are ok to abort. But here is the foot of a baby at 14 weeks.

unborn baby's foot at 14 weeks
unborn baby’s foot at 14 weeks

You don’t see a huge difference here either. Nor is there a huge difference between the second and third trimester

26 weeks sonogram of an unborn baby
26 weeks sonogram of an unborn baby (end of 2nd)
28 weeks
28 weeks

You can see facial expressions on each child, even though there is a two-week difference.

Most opinions people have about what the cutoff should be for abortion to be legal become meaningless when you see pictures of unborn babies right before and after that stage. It becomes clear that the only moment, the only beginning point when babies could have rights is either birth or conception. At birth, the baby travels down the woman’s birth canal into the outside world. It is merely a change in location and dependency (although the born baby will still be dependent on his/her mother for an awful lot. It is an incident in the life of a child. Conception, on the other hand, is the moment when that baby comes into existence.  From a scientific standpoint, it is the beginning of life.  Human rights should start when human life begins

Share on Facebook

Pro-choice supporter: pregnancy is a “venereal disease”

A medical ethicist who supported abortion said the following shortly after Roe versus Wade:

“The ethical principle is that pregnancy, when wanted, is a healthy process, pregnancy, when not wanted is a disease – in fact, a venereal disease.”

Joseph Fletcher, The Ethics of Genetic Control: Ending Reproductive Roulette (Garden City, New York: Anchor Press, 1974) 142

Share on Facebook

Mother who coerced daughter into abortion regrets it years later

“No one knows of the torment that can come after it’s over, unless they’ve gone through it. We could not talk about it for years, and still it is hard… This is my first grandchild!”

From a mother who coerced her daughter into aborting, describing how she cries, even many years later when thinking about the lost grandchild. She is under psychiatric care.

Paul B Fowler Abortion: Toward an Evangelical Consensus (Portland, Oregon: Multnomah Press, 1987) 197

Share on Facebook

Christian professor at University of Texas: “an infant is not fully human”

Dr. Charles Hartshorne, professor at the University of Texas (as of 1987) and self-proclaimed Christian:

“Granted that a fetus is human in origin and possible destiny, in what further sense is it human? The entire problem lies here. If there are pro-life activists who have thrown much light on this question, I do not know their names…

It [the unborn baby] cannot speak, reason or judge between right and wrong. It cannot have personal relations, without which a person is not functionally a person at all, until months – and not, except minimally, in 2 years – have passed….

Of course, an infant is not fully human… Persons who are already functionally persons in the full sense have more important rights even than infants.”

Charles Hartshorne, “Concerning Abortion: an Attempt at a Rational View,” The Christian Century, January 21, 1981, 42 – 45

Share on Facebook

Abortionist Dr. Deborah Oyer: “I love the work I do”

fully developed legs of baby at 10 weeks
fully developed legs of baby at 10 weeks

Dr. Deborah Oye ron aborting babies:

“And they need to know that the reason I continue to go to work every day is that I love the work I do, that there is nothing I would rather be doing and that I truly feel there is nothing better I could be doing for the women and families of this country.”

Physicians for Reproductive Health “Why I Provide Abortions”

http://prh.org/provider-voices/why-i-provide-abortions/

Remains from an abortion at just 7 weeks – most abortions are done at this stage or later
Remains from an abortion at just 7 weeks – most abortions are done at this stage or later
Share on Facebook

University professor says it’s okay to take organs out of living aborted babies

Professor Mary B Mahowald of Case Western Reserve University, has written that it is “morally defensible” to remove organs or tissues from “nonviable” fetuses (in the first 6 months of development in the womb) while they are still alive,

20 weeks
20 weeks

“if dead fetuses are not available or are not conducive to successful transplants.”

Mahowald acknowledged “added concerns” because of the children’s “possible sensitivity to pain,” but said that “this concern may be satisfactorily addressed on a practical level using anesthesia.”

Mahowald Mary B., J. Silver, R. A. Ratcheson  “The Ethical Options in Transplanting Fetal Tissue” Hastings Center Report 17 (1). P 11

Share on Facebook

While president of feminist group praises the one child policy, Chinese woman undergoes five forced abortions

Molly Yard (president of NOW, The National Organization for Women, a proabortion feminist group, at the time) in response to a question on the Oprah Winfrey Show:

“I consider the Chinese government’s policy among the most intelligent in the world. It is a policy limited to the overpopulated areas, and it is an attempt to feed the people of China. I find it very intelligent.”

As quoted by Gary Bauer “Abetting Coercion in China” The Washington Times, Oct 10, 1989

Meanwhile, in China, Liu Ping was the victim forced abortions in China. When she married her husband, she was supposed to be fitted with an IUD, as all married women were required to be. However, she was suffering from kidney disease and the IUD was too much of a health risk. From her testimony.

“From 1983 to 1990, because of the one child policy, I had to undergo five forced abortions on the following dates: September 28, 1984; December 17, 1985; March 20, 1986; May 5, 1989; and December 14, 1990.…. I suffered greatly at the hands of the inhumane one child policy.

In the 1980s, shortly after implementation of the one child policy in China, there were many severe methods of surveillance and punishment to prevent unplanned pregnancies and above quota births. My factory’s Family-Planning Commission used three levels of control: at the factory level, in the factory clinic, and on the factory floor. There was a system of collective punishment. If one worker violated the rules, all workers would be punished. Workers monitored each other. Women of reproductive age can account for 60% of my factory floor. Colleagues were suspicious and hostile to each other because of the one child policy. Two of my pregnancies were reported by my colleagues to the Family-Planning Commission.

When discovered, pregnant women would be dragged to undergo forced abortions. There was simply no other choice. We had no dignity as potential childbearers. By order of the factory’s Family-Planning Commission, every month during her menstrual period, women had to undress in front of the birth planning doctor for examination. If anyone escaped this examination, she would be forced to take a pregnancy test at the hospital. We were only allowed to collect a salary after it was confirmed that we were not pregnant.

The day of my fifth and last abortion, December 14, 1990, was the saddest day of my life. Because I was not able to prove that I wasn’t pregnant within the 10 to 15 day period, the birth planning doctor in the factory clinic found out about my pregnancy. That day, officials from the factory’s Family-Planning Commission forced me to be driven to the City Police Hospital and forced me to have an abortion in the birth planning department. It was my first operation in that hospital. All my previous abortions took place in the Central City Hospital.

I did not know what officials in my factory told the doctors. After the abortion, the doctors, without my knowledge, implanted a metal IUD in my body. When I learned of the procedure, I protested that I had a kidney disease and could not keep the IUD, but they completely ignored me. The doctor just gave the bill to my husband and told him to pay. While my husband argued with the doctors, I was recovering in the hospital bed. When I left the operating room, still weak, I could not find my husband. I was told that he was arrested. I collapsed crying from the physical toll of the two of operations and the emotional shock. A kind nurse tried to comfort me somewhat, but she was shood away by a man who also threatened to have me arrested by the police.

By this time, the family-planning officials who dragged me to the hospital were nowhere to be found. I felt alone, sick, and weak. Afterwards, I learned that my husband had been sentenced to criminal detention without a trial for violating and obstructing the one child policy, disturbing the normal operations of the hospital, and disturbing social peace. Fifteen days later, my husband was finally released to return home.

I was in great pain from medical IUD, and the weakness of the abortion, and almost did not want to live. The rest of my husband deprived me of the care of my family. My young child did not know what was happening and kept crying for his father. I did not know what to do and could only hold my son and cry with him.… Those painful fifteen days of separation became the catalyst of my eventual failed marriage.

My body suffered great damage from all those five forced abortions. I gradually grew afraid of family life with my husband. I tried to find excuses to refuse any intimacy demands for my husband. I grew to hate him after the IUD was inserted because I blamed my sufferings on him, on his unwillingness to be surgically sterilized. He had known of my kidney disease, but would not make any sacrifice for me, and therefore, he didn’t love me.

After the fifth abortion in the IUD insertion, my factory also gave me a serious administrative warning and find me six months wages. Afterwards, I had to go to the factory clinic every month for exams to make certain that I had not privately taking out the IUD or become pregnant again. I carry the IUD in my body for over a decade before finally came to America.”

Liu Ping eventually moved to the United States, divorced her husband, became a Christian, and subsequently reconciled with her husband. She claims to have found healing through her religion.

She told her story before the Hearing before the Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, and Human Rights of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, 112th Congress, First Session. September 22, 2011

Share on Facebook

Planned Parenthood praises abortion regulations after opposing them in every state that has proposed them

Planned Parenthood spokesperson Rebecca Cavanaugh on the closing of 2 abortion the clinics because they violated regulations and were operating under unsafe conditions:

“These inspections and regulations are important and the clinics which were closed this week were not operating under the rules and regulations which are already in place, and we support them being closed. But we worry that for women with limited financial means, or limited means of transportation, this just removed two options.”

This is ironic because Planned Parenthood fought the law requiring inspections for clinics to and now. Now, however, they realize they have to do damage control.

The law that closed the clinics went into effect because 2 women died at them, and there were various reports of unhealthy and unsafe conditions. Also from Planned Parenthood:

“Gosnell absolutely changed things, because we are seeing a lot more unannounced inspections to our facilities, which we welcome,”

“Our concern is that more clinics will have to close, and that will remove more choices for women.”

“That we welcome.” This is completely untrue – Planned Parenthood describes itself as opposing such laws on their website.

Jill King Greenwood  “Abortion clinics feel grip of new, tighter regulations” Tribune-Review/Pittsburgh Tribune-Review April 21, 2012

Quoted by Dave Andrusko

Share on Facebook

Abortion and a baby’s soul – Words from a clinic worker

“When a mother decides that she isn’t ready to have her baby, the baby’s soul stays in the mother’s heart until she is ready for it.”

What one teenager getting an abortion was told by a clinic worker

“TEEN WHO ABORTED GIVEN STRANGE INFORMATION FROM NURSE” Teen Abortion Issues March 16, 2014

Unborn potential viction of the bro-choice mentality
Unborn potential victim of abortion clinic

See what this baby would look like after an abortion

Share on Facebook