Abortion clinics “overbooked” to guard against “loss of revenues”

From one pro-choice author, who spend time observing at an abortion clinic an interview and clinic workers:

“Like many other nonprofit clinics, Urban [the name the author gave to the clinic discussed in her book] typically overbooked clients, especially at peak hours, to guard against the loss of revenues that would result from too many no shows. This meant, for counselors, a never-ending stream of clients in the waiting room…The clinic had to make the most efficient use of medical personnel, the highest-paid workers in the clinic, for financial reasons and for courtesy.”

Carole Joffe The Regulation of Sexuality: Experiences of Family-Planning Workers (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986) 83

There are 2 things to take away from this quote. One, that clinics expect a certain percentage of women not show up. This shows that many women are ambivalent about having an abortion even after they make the appointment. The other is that it’s obviously hard to provide quality health care to women when there is such a high patient load. One can wonder how this compromises the quality of care at abortion clinics.

Share on Facebook

NARAL on justice Samuel Alito and contraception

Some spin from NARAL:

Justice Samuel Alito wrote:

“What, for example, is the objection to informing a woman that certain methods of birth control are “abortifacients,” i.e., that they do not prevent fertilization but terminate the development of the fetus after conception? Why cannot the State of Illinois require that this information be provided to patients, in the doctor’s own words, so that women for whom the difference is morally significant can make an informal choice? Would a court hesitate for a moment before upholding government’s authority to require that patients be informed about the operation of any other drug or medical device?”

NARAL’s Nancy Keenan responded by saying:

“Alito’s memo is a litany of legal strategies designed to undermine women’s reproductive health. He even confuses birth control with abortion and advocates additional restrictions on women’s access to contraception.”

Washington Post (Campaign for the Supreme Court)

Cited in “This will keep them howling for at least a week” Pro-Life Blogs (Originally from jinvinjeohsophat) December 1, 2005

So apparently even informing women about all the scientific details concerning birth control is “anti-choice” and “interferes with women’s access to contraception.” NARAL opposes giving women information about contraceptives just like they oppose giving women information about abortion. Anything that might make a woman question whether certain forms of birth control birth control or abortion is right for her must be stifled.

 

Share on Facebook

Abortion is “technically problematic” after 24 weeks

From one medical textbook:

24 weeks – still legal to aborted many US states and throughout Canada
24 weeks – still legal to abort in many US states and throughout Canada

“The size of the conceptus at this stage in pregnancy [Post 24 weeks gestation] makes D&E technically problematic… Delivery of a fetus after 24 weeks gestation will frequently result in an infant capable of survival…”

Joe Leigh Simpson, M.D. and Sherman Elias, M.D. Essentials of Prenatal Diagnosis (Churchill Livingstone, 1993) 327

In fact, children have survived being born at as early as 21 weeks.

Share on Facebook

Legal abortion pioneer: women don’t have the right to reproduce

Dr. Lonny Myers, who was active in the fight to get abortion legalized:

“I will not support the right of a 14-year-old to have a baby. I don’t believe that women have the right to reproduce indefinitely. I will not stand up and say they have the right to have 10 or 12 children. When you have no means of support, when you have them and deposit them on society.”

“Prochoicer Asks: Should We Mandate Abortion for the Young?” Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life Newsletter, June 1980. Quoted in Paul B Fowler Abortion: Toward an Evangelical Consensus (Portland, Oregon: Multnomah Press, 1987)

So much for pro-choice!

Share on Facebook

Membership in postabortion support group increases exponentially, shows that women suffer after their abortions

Pro-choicers often argue that postabortion syndrome (PAS) is a myth,   and that women are happy and relieved after their abortions. Contradicting this, however, is the extremely high number of women involved in postabortion ministries and outreaches. An author said the following in 1987. Since then, the number of women seeking postabortion help and joining postabortion support groups has increased exponentially:

“Little evidence can be found to support abortion as psychologically therapeutic, whereas much evidence shows it can be harmful. How else does one account for the rapid rise of an organization such as Women Exploited by Abortion (WEBA)? In the first 10 months of its existence, this organization grew from 2 members to 10,000 members who had previously had abortions, but now are strongly pro-life.”

Paul B Fowler Abortion: Toward an Evangelical Consensus (Portland, Oregon: Multnomah Press, 1987) 172

Share on Facebook

Babies born alive at Midtown hospital, CNN ignores the story

Pro-lifer Nancy Creger Tells the following story. She was doing research for Georgia State Senator Joe Burton on a pro-life bill at Vital Records.

“As I was writing down the names of clinics, the Vital Records director looked at me and said:

“They are having live births at Midtown Hospital.”

Midtown, I learned, specialized in late-term abortions, and advertised in newspapers up and down the East Coast. I asked her how she knew this, and she said she got the death certificates. She explained that birth records were confidential, but death records were public information. We put in a request for a computer search to be done of all births at Midtown. Since Midtown was an all-abortion hospital specializing in late-term, we knew that there should not be any live births reported. However, since birth records were confidential, the Vital Records specialist had to do a computer search of all of the death certificates and compare them with the birth records – a computer match. These guys were anxious to get this information out. I was the perfect vehicle.

They photocopied the death certificates and greatly enlarged them, put them in an envelope and gave them to me.

I took them home, spread them out on my bedroom floor, and cried.

Then I called Ted Turner’s CNN. I knew that this was a huge scandal, and that CNN would give it national coverage. The reporter for CNN was young, and this story was hot. She met with me and I gave her all of my documents – the death certificates – everything. In those days I was very naive, just beginning my long career in investigative journalism. She had the camera team reserved for the day and they were scheduled to start filming at Midtown. Later she informed me that the story had been cancelled. It took many, many phone calls to CNN to get my documents returned to me. Someone at CNN wanted the story buried, just like today with the abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell story of the massacre of babies at his clinic. I never met her again, and my stuff was left at the guard shack at CNN.”

….

Death certificates revealed that in 1980 10 babies survived abortions at Midtown, in 1981 three survived and as of October 1982 one had survived.

One baby lived for 13 hours and five minutes, the longest time; one died in 20 minutes. In addition to the 13-hour survivor, seven others lived for more than an hour, ranging from one hour and 45 minutes to six hours and 20 minutes. Death certificates gave no indication any of the 14 were transported to the neonatal unit at Grady Hospital or any other facility specializing in the care of premature babies. Midtown Hospital asserted that transporting a surviving baby to a hospital was the attending physician’s decision to make.

Nine of the 14 death certificates listed “hospital disposal” or “Midtown Hospital” under the category of “cemetery or crematory name.”

Nancy CregerGosnell is Not New: Babies Were Born Alive After Abortions in 1983” LifeNews.com 5/5/13

This is far from an isolated incident. Read more cases of babies born alive after abortions, and denied medical care, here. Hear the testimony of a woman who was born alive after an abortion and survived..

Share on Facebook

Photographs of miscarried babies show the humanity of the unborn

Women who suffer miscarriages often suffer in silence. Society does not always recognize the grief that a woman, and often her partner,  feel. Here are some organizations that help give support to the families of miscarried children.

As you look at these remarkable pictures of babies who were miscarried, keep in mind that all of these babies could’ve been legally aborted in the United States and in most other countries.

This baby was miscarried at just 6 weeks
This baby was miscarried at just 6 weeks
Another baby miscarried at 6 weeks
Another baby miscarried at 6 weeks

babynoah

 

Another baby miscarried at 12 weeks
Another baby miscarried at 12 weeks
The parents of this miscarried baby named him Philip
The parents of this miscarried baby named him Philip
Another picture of Philip
Another picture of Philip
Miscarried at 19 weeks
Miscarried at 19 weeks

19 weeks a

 

This baby was miscarried at 20 weeks
This baby was stillborn at 20 weeks

Keep in mind that all of these babies could be legally aborted. In an abortion, they would’ve been ripped apart violently by the suction machine (in the first trimester) or torn apart by forceps or poisoned in utero (in the 2nd trimester)

Share on Facebook

Student nurse comments on remains of aborted baby

A nurse told the following story:

I’m a registered nurse, have always been pro-life, but one of the most concerning things I heard was from a student nurse telling me about her experience in an abortion clinic. She described in detail the remains of the 10 week old child and how “interesting” it was.

She was so delighted and excited, that she didnt even seem to realize that louding [sic] proclaiming this in the break room in front of seasoned nurses wasn’t really the done thing.

Comment on

Sarah Terzo “Nursing student witnesses abortion, rethinks pro-choice stand” Live Action  December 23, 2013

Share on Facebook

Researcher links abortion to breast cancer, says it’s an “avoidable risk”

After extensive research, Dr. Joel Brind, professor of endocrinology at City University of New York, concluded,

“The single most avoidable risk factor for breast cancer is induced abortion.”

Dr. Joel Brind, “Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of the Abortion/Breast Cancer Link”;

Share on Facebook

The idea of abortion versus the idea of killing

In a chapter about abortion and a medical textbook written shortly before Roe versus Wade, it says:

“Through public conditioning, use of language, concepts and laws, the idea of abortion can be separated from the idea of killing.”

Leonide M. Tanner, ed., “Developing Professional Parameters: Nursing and Social Work Roles in the Care of the Induced Abortion Patient” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 14 (December 1971): 1271

Share on Facebook