They said it.
Emily Letts of Cherry Hill Women’s Center had an abortion, which she filmed to show that abortion was easy and positive. She wanted to portray abortion in a good light. She only showed herself in the video, smiling as she aborted the pregnancy. The camera never panned down to see the operation itself.
This video shows the WHOLE story.
Please watch it to the end, to get the full impact.
Share on Facebook“…Every human embryologist in the world knows that the life of the new individual human being begins at fertilization. It is not belief. It is scientific fact.”
Ward Kischer, human embryologist, University of Arizona
“You Can Stop Injustice” Human Life Alliance Supplement, 2010
Read quotes from medical textbooks verifying this here.
Share on FacebookClinic worker Jenny Higgins says that wealthy women get better abortion care than poor women do. She says:
“… We almost never service wealthier women at the clinics where I worked. In the southeastern clinic, which was in an urban area, the majority of the clients were African-American….. [Wealthy women] are more likely to have access to higher quality, private abortion care, either due to their insurance plans or because they can afford to pay out-of-pocket for such services.”
….
“Even though I prided myself on providing attentive and empathic care to the patients with whom I worked, the clinic infrastructure and patient overload prohibited the kind of service that members of the middle and upper classes have come to expect – or the kind of care I had received at relatively posh student health centers or private gynecologist offices.”
Jenny Higgins “Sex, Unintended Pregnancy, and Poverty: One Woman’s Evolution from “Choice” to “Reproductive Justice” in Krista Jacob. Abortion under Attack: Women on the Challenges Facing Choice (Emeryville, CA: Seal Press, 2006) 37-38
Share on FacebookDr. Jay Kelinson, who performed the abortion in the film the silent scream:
Interviewer: How many abortions do think you performed in your career?
Dr.: I’d say I probably performed 10,000 or more. I can remember days when I would do 30, 35 abortions.
Interviewer: would you do second trimester abortions, D&E’s even for medical reasons?
Dr: No, absolutely not. that is the most horrifying procedure I can think about. There is just absolutely no way I would ever do that.
This interview was shown in Dr. Bernard Nathanson’s video “Eclipse of Reason”, which recorded a D&E abortion, which is a late-term abortion where the baby is torn apart with forceps (see image below) You can see Eclipse of Reason here.
However, whether an abortion is done in the first trimester or the second trimester or even the third trimester, a beating heart is stilled and a baby’s body is torn apart. Compare the two diagrams below – one is of a suction abortion in the first trimester, a procedure that takes place thousands of times a day in the United States alone. The second is a D&E abortion, the most common method of abortion in the second trimester – roughly one in every 10 abortions are done after the first trimester, mostly by this method – meaning it is performed hundreds of times a day.
An eight-week-old baby – before and after a suction abortion
A 16-week-old baby, before and after an abortion by D&E
]
Each picture shows a baby torn apart mercilessly by the abortion instruments.
Share on FacebookFrom an interview with an abortionist, talking about the difference between doing a D&E to remove a dead baby during a miscarriage and performing an elective abortion:
“If it’s [a miscarriage], you’re like [with a pained voice], “Oh, here’s this little life!” And you know that it was meant to be because, that’s what happened. And if it’s an abortion, you just feel sad that the woman wasn’t able to raise the child.”
Lori Freedman Willing and Unable: Doctors’ Constraints in Abortion Care (Nashville, Tennessee: Vanderbilt University Press, 2010) 80 – 81 This is the procedure he is talking about.
Note that he used the term “baby.”
Share on FacebookBelow is a screenshot from a video that shows the bodies of two aborted babies who were found in a basement in Missouri. The house had been owned by an illegal abortionist who practiced fifty years ago. LifeSiteNews covered the story, and I will quote from them:
Contractors recently hired to renovate the old home discovered in the basement the remains of two tiny babies floating in a preservative solution inside two dusty jars with screw-on lids.
“I know they did medical procedures and stuff,” said the property’s owner William C. Neff to Connecttristates.com. “I was told that they helped a lot of ladies. That’s all I know.”
The contractors were examining the basement on Wednesday when they made the grisly discovery. The remains of the babies were found underneath an antiquated medical examining table in a ceramic container that was covered in rags.
If you look closely, you can see the arms and legs of the baby in the jar on the left. You can see the profile of a baby, (head down) his/her head, body, legs, etc. in the jar on the right. You can make out the shape of the face (side view) if you look closely at the bottom of the jar.
There is an interview at the end of the video done by Channel 7, a local news station, but they did not show the bodies of the babies- the jar was held out of sight. One reporter referred to the babies as “specimens.” There was little acknowledgement of their humanity.
The whole video is below:
Share on FacebookPro-choice activist Malia Cohen on a law drafted to place burdensome regulations on the advertising of Crisis pregnancy centers:
“As a city, we have a responsibility to protect our most vulnerable residents.”
She accused the centers of pushing
“anti-abortion propaganda and mistruths on unsuspecting women.”
Jesse McKinley “Politicians Open Front on Abortion in Bay Area” New York Times August 2, 2011
This is the most ironic quote I have read in a long time. What about THIS victim:
And many former abortion providers and postabortion women can tell you that it is the abortion clinics that give out propaganda and lies.
Share on Facebook
From a medical textbook on how to do abortions:
“Involuntary viewing of the products of conception is not an issue during surgical abortions, but the patient needs to know that during a medical[pill] abortion she may see the products. Some women are not affected by viewing the tissue or even find it reassuring; others prefer not to see the tissue at all…
If the pregnancy is eight weeks or beyond, she may indeed see a tiny embryo. The presence or absence of human shape and extremities may have an important impact. After providing a description, ask what, if any, affect the information has on her and then validate her reaction.”
Maureen Paul, E Steve Lichtenberg, Lynn Borgatta, David Grimes, Philip G Stubblefield A Clinician’s Guide to Medical and Surgical Abortion (New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1999) 34
Katha Pollitt joined Politics and Prose to promote her new pro-abortion book, PRO. She gave her reasons for writing it:
“I wrote this book because all you have to do is open up the newspaper and see the way things are going…Since, 2010 when the Republicans were so successful there have been 205 new abortion restrictions passed in the states, and, even more than the restrictions- the discourse. You can just feel it shifting. You can feel it shifting toward the anti-abortion side of language and the greater and greater defensiveness of the pro-choice side.”
Carole Novielli “Pro-Abortion Author Criticizes Planned Parenthood, Says Tide Shifting in Pro-Life Direction” LifeNews 11/7/14
Appeared originally in Saynsumthn
Share on FacebookBritish abortionist Dr Kate Paterson expresses frustration at the shortage of abortion doctors in England:
“There are an awful lot of doctors already working helping women to get pregnant in the NHS and in the private IVF sector. There are a hell of a lot less who want to help women when they are pregnant and can’t cope. There is a desperate need for this kind of work and women can be in really extreme situations.”
More young doctors oppose abortions on ethical grounds London Evening Standard 16 April 2007
Seems like the shortage of abortionists is not just an American problem. Perhaps many doctors find ripping apart babies distasteful, despite the money there is to be made.
Share on Facebook