Couple don’t want to lose their baby…unless the child would be disabled

Interview with a couple that wanted to have an amniocentesis to see if their baby had Down syndrome or another problem (with the intent to abort if he did) but were afraid of the test causing a miscarriage:

“Husband: we really want this baby…

Wife:… And if it’s a healthy baby I really hate the thought of losing this person.”

Barbara Katz Rothman. The Tentative Pregnancy: How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood (New York: WW Norton & Company, 1993) 6

Is a disabled baby not a person?

Share on Facebook

Abortionist: We’ll ensure women can abort in the third trimester

Dr. Leroy Carhart, late term abortionist:

“we are going to do everything in our power to ensure that women still have an option for late-second- and the early-third-trimester abortions that are medically indicated.”

Sarah Kliff “The Abortion Evangelist” Newsweek August 31, 2009

All too often, “medically indicated” means abortions for almost any reason. Emotional health usually counts as as reason for abortions. If a woman says her pregnancy makes her anxious or depressed, that could be considered a “medically indicated” reason for abortion. At other times, there is a health problem with the baby. For example, when the baby has Down syndrome he or she will be aborted 90% of the time, often in the second or third trimester.

7 months in the womb. Could be aborted by
7 months in the womb. Could be aborted by Leroy Carhart
Share on Facebook

Joseph Fletcher describes a “person”

Joseph Fletcher, abortion advocate and professor at the University of Virginia:

An “individual” is not a “person” unless he has an IQ of at least 40, is self-aware, has self-control, with a sense of time (past, present, and future) and an ability to relate to others.

Joseph Fletcher, Situation Ethics: The New Morality, cited by Mark O’Keefe, “Personhood: When Does It Begin…or End?” Oregonian, 12 February 1995, Bl.

This would mean that newborn babies were not people, justifying not just abortion, but infanticide.

not a person (?) 7 months in the womb
not a person (?) 7 months in the womb
Share on Facebook

Baby more developed in second trimester abortions

Carole Meyers, abortionist, medical director of Planned Parenthood of Maryland:

“There are fewer providers that do second-trimester abortions than five years ago. The second-trimester procedure is more controversial because the fetus is more developed.”

“Abortion gets wide protection in Md. law; Procedure likely to remain available if Roe is overturned” The Baltimore Sun 1-15-2006

14 weeks- second trimester
14 weeks- second trimester
Share on Facebook

Clinic worker tells patients they won’t do sex selection abortions

An abortion clinic worker from the biggest chain of clinics in Australia talks about when  women come in and ask for sex selection abortions:

“It’s very rare, and we have to say (to the patient) we don’t provide abortion on the basis of gender.

But there would be nothing to stop a woman from going elsewhere and giving a different reason.”

“Couples expecting girls ‘demand abortions’ because they want boys, say obstetricians” News Limited (Australia) APRIL 28, 2013

Share on Facebook

Chinese family planning officials pressure women to abort

A Chinese woman who worked in family planning describes the pressure pregnant women were put under to abort their “illegal” babies

“A positive pregnancy test spelled trouble for a woman with a child. The representative would take the young woman aside for a series of “heart-to-heart” chats. “Have an abortion immediately,” she would be told, “and you will receive a cash bonus and a week off work.” If the woman did not respond to these inducements within the next few days, the carrot would be replaced by a stick. The woman would be told that she would not be allowed to enter her illegal child’s name on the factory’s population registers after birth, so that her child would have no medical benefits, no grain rations, no opportunity to attend school, and no chance of factory employment in the future. “For the good of your fatherland, your factory, and your family,” she would be urged, “you must “think clear” about abortion.”

If the woman resisted her representative’s warnings, activists from the Women’s Federation and the Party would step in and lend a hand. The daily chats would take on the character of struggle sessions, as the pregnant woman was attacked for her stubbornness by several activists in turn. There are heavy financial penalties for “illegal” second birth, she would be told. If she continue to resist, she would not only lose her annual bonus, but she would have to pay a heavy fine as well. The meetings also spilled over from work to home, as groups of activists visited the woman each night in her apartment. Husbands and mothers-in-law, who were often opposed to the idea of an abortion, would be required to attend these talks. “Do you want China to be backward and impoverished forever?” They would be asked. “Your individual whims in childbearing must be subject to the interest of society as a whole.”

If the woman and her family still stood their ground, the pressure would be turned up a notch. The senior leadership of the Women’s Federation and the factory Party organization would enter the fray, determined to break their will to resist. As many as a dozen officials might impose themselves on her and her family at all hours of the day and night, hectoring, blustering, threatening dire consequences. If she still insisted on having an illegal child, the local party chief would join as well. She would then hear, for the first time, the ultimate threat in China’s social welfare state: “You will lose your job if you continue to resist remedial measures.”

Stephen W Mosher A Mother’s Ordeal: One Woman’s Fight against China’s One Child Policy (Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1993) 264 – 265

Share on Facebook

Abortion kills a human being- but there’s no need to be morally troubled

At conception comes a new human being.

Abortion, then, involves the killing of a human being. But that abortion involves the deliberate killing of a human being is no reason for abortion to be illegal. Nor should one be morally troubled by it….

From an article in the Ottawa Citizen

Pro-Abort Professor: Abortion Involves Deliberate Killing? That’s Still Not A Reason To Be Morally Troubled.” Stand Your Ground MAY 6, 2010

 

Share on Facebook

Clinic worker: Abortion is “motherhood” and a “sacred right”

Abortion is utmost motherhood—a woman transpiring her valued comfort zone to preserve the destiny of her offspring. Abortion is life and death. A code of honor. A sacred rite.

Everyday is Mother’s Day at the abortion clinic The Abortioneers May 13, 2010

9-10 weeks
9-10 weeks

Is the killing of this baby “a sacred right?”

Go see how this baby would look after an abortion

Share on Facebook

Chinese woman describes infanticide of baby girls

A Chinese woman talks about infanticide of baby girls:

“Over the course of my stay in the village I was to hear of other little girls being killed to make way for boys. Nearly all of these cases involved newborns, who were drowned or smothered at birth before they had a chance to draw their first breath. What was true of Jiangsu Province was also true of other parts of China. The situation in Anhui Province, immediately to the north of Jiangsu, was among the worst. The Anhui Women’s Federation reported that in one small village alone, 40 girls had been drowned in 1980 and 1981. Friends returning from the countryside told me that in some more remote villages there were almost no surviving female infants.”

Stephen W Mosher A Mother’s Ordeal: One Woman’s Fight against China’s One Child Policy (Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1993)

Share on Facebook

A woman seeking abortion is aware what’s in her womb, says prochoicer

Pro-Abortion writer Kathleen Reeves, on an informed consent bill:

“ I think we can be pretty sure that a woman about to have an abortion is aware of what’s inside her womb. And in case she’s not, the doctors who counsel her before the abortion are perfectly capable of telling her….

The legislators behind these bills are arrogant in assuming they have something to say to a woman about her “womb.” There’s no doubt that, as a woman, it’s hard to predict how you’ll feel after an abortion. But an image of the fetus sheds no light on the decision and adds nothing to the emotional process. On the other hand, having a cadre of politicians take this image by force does add something to the experience: the sense of having been intimidated, assumed stupid, and even violated. “

Kathleen Reeves “Ultrasound Before Abortion: A Wasteful Bullying Tactic” RH Reality Check February 11, 2009

Share on Facebook