Women’s Health after Abortion: The Medical and Psychological Evidence

Here are some studies about abortion’s dangers from the book “Women’s Health after Abortion: The Medical and Psychological Evidence”

Elizabeth Ring-Cassidy and Ian Gentles. Women’s Health after Abortion: The Medical and Psychological Evidence Second Edition (Toronto, Canada: The deVeber Institute for Bioethics and Social Research, 2003)

(43)

A study found that “most dramatic uterine perforations during first trimester abortions are unreported or even unsuspected.”

Kaali SG, Szigetvari, IA, and Bartfai GS. The Frequency and Management of Uterine Perforations During First Trimester Abortions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1989 August; 161 (2): 406 – 8 P407

A perforation is a cut on the uterine wall. These injuries can cause bleeding and infection.

***

(18)

“The observed association between induced abortion and an increased risk of the later development of breast cancer is congruent with our understanding of the hormonal effects of pregnancy on a woman’s breast tissue. Prior to her first pregnancy, a woman’s breast is composed largely of connective tissue linking ducts which contain few milk producing cells. Upon conception, a surge of oestradiol reaches twentyfold in the first trimester, triggering an explosive growth of breast tissue, a period when breast cells are most likely to be affected by carcinogens. When a woman completes her first full pregnancy, further hormonal changes propel these newly produced breast cells through a state of differentiation, a natural maturing process which greatly reduces the risk of future breast cancer.

An abrupt, premature termination of the first pregnancy by abortion arrests this process before the cancer reducing evolution of hormone release later in pregnancy can occur, leaving a large population of dangerously stimulated breast tissue cells in place, greatly raising future cancer risk.”

Kelsey, JL, “A Review of the Epidemiology Of Human Breast Cancer” Epidemiologic Reviews, 1979, 1: 74 – 109

***

18 to 19

“Animal studies support this model. Russo and Russo exposed two groups of rats to a chemical carcinogen. One group, who mated and carried a first pregnancy to term, developed mammary tumors at a rate of 6%. The other group, who mated, became pregnant, then were aborted (via hysterectomy) developed mammary tumors at an incidence of 78%; virgin rats also developed tumors at a high rate, but not as high as those that were aborted.”

Russo J, Russo IH. Susceptibility of the Mammary Gland to Carcinogenesis. Pregnancy Interruption As a Risk Factor in Tumor Incidence. American Journal of Pathology 1980 August; 100 (2); 497 – 512

****

44

“dilation and evacuation between 12 and 16 weeks… have the potential to cause significant morbidity and mortality.” Because of possible uterine complications, the researchers conclude that such procedures should only be used where intensive emergency treatment can be initiated immediately.”

Trott E., Ziegler W, Levey J. Major Complications Associated with Termination of a Second Trimester Pregnancy; a Case Report. Delaware Medical Journal 1995 May; 67 (5): 294 – 296

***

53

“The greatest consequence of induced abortion for future pregnancy is a rise in the rate of premature births ranging from 30 to 700% Preterm babies weighing less than 1500 grams suffer an incidence of cerebral palsy over 38 times greater than full-term babies. Thus induced abortion tremendously increases a woman’s risk of later bearing a child with cerebral palsy.”

***

66

“The abortion procedure can trigger an episode of PID [pelvic inflammatory disorder] in any woman, but those postabortion women who already have chlamydia are at far higher risk of PID than women who do not carry the organism. Women can be asymptomatic and still harbor chlamydia trachomatis in the lower genital tract. If the abortion clinic does not test for this and prescribe the appropriate antibiotic regime, the woman may only discover the chlamydia while being treated for postabortion PID. By then it may be too late to avoid later fertility problems.”

***

“Delay in the onset of symptoms is a critical factor when considering PID caused by chlamydia following abortion. Blackwell and colleagues found from their patient records that women continued to develop symptoms at 11 weeks, 24 weeks, and 36 weeks post abortion. Osser and Persson found it to be variable: if the woman was positive for chlamydia before the abortion, the time of onset for salpingitis (infection of the fallopian tubes) was 14.1 days and for endometritis (infection of the uterus) 8.2 days.… Such complications would not be identified by abortion clinics as immediate sequelae or coded as being related to abortion at all.”

Blackwell AL, Thomas PD,Wareham K, Emery SJ. Health Gains from Screening for Infection of the Lower Genital Tract in Women Attending for Termination of Pregnancy. The Lancet 1993 July 24; 342 (8865): 206 – 10, P209

Osser S., Persson K. Post-Abortive Pelvic Infection Associated with Chlamydia Trachomatis and the Influence of Humoral Immunity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1984 (November 15; 150 (6): 699 – 703

Share on Facebook

Women With Chlamydia who have Abortions At Greater Risk for Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

Untreated women with chlamydia infection at the time of abortion had a cumulative risk of 72% of developing early and/or late PID (pelvic inflammatory disease) if observed for 24 months. The risk was reduced to 8% of the infection was treated at the time of the abortion.

Sorensen, JL, Thranov I, Hoff G, Dirach J, Dansgaard MT A Double-Blind Randomized Study Of the Effect of erythromycin In Preventing Pelvic Inflammatory Disease after First Trimester Abortion British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992 May; 99 (5) 434 – 8, P436

Yet most abortion clinics do not screened for STDs in the patients they abort.

Share on Facebook

Abortion Pill Like “Giving Birth”

“It was quite a big thing, like giving birth, so I wish that I had been there for her. It was a bloody mess. Wendy went through contractions, just like a pregnancy. We didn’t think it would be quite like that.”

Boyfriend of a woman who had an abortion by pill

James D Slack Abortion, Execution, and the Consequences of Taking Life (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2009) 64

Share on Facebook

Dr. Susan Poppema on RU-486

Dr. Susan Poppema, NAF president, discusses one problem with RU-486.

“Having a group of women doing a lot of bleeding and cramping in your office, when they would rather be home, doesn’t do much for the [patient] flow in your clinic.”

She argues that women should be sent home to abort alone – despite the risk to a woman’s health and the lack of medical attention should something go wrong. This is because she is concerned about  “patient flow” efficiency in her clinic.

Wendy Wright “The Deceit behind RU-486: Who’s Really in Control?” Family Voice, November/December 2000

Share on Facebook

Woman Experiences Heavy Bleeding and Diarrhea After Abortion Pill

In the December 5, 1994 edition of Time magazine, a patient who took the combination RU-486 and prostaglandin said the following:

“I was very nauseous in a couple of hours. I threw up constantly for three days… It was like food poisoning. I couldn’t keep anything down.”

“I went into the restroom. When I started to stand up, it was like a faucet turning on. There was a steady stream of blood. I passed a golf ball sized blood clot that scared me. I thought maybe it was the fetus.

The cramps stayed steady. In the last fifteen minutes of my appointment, I was doubled over. The bleeding was very heavy, heavier than a period. My mom drove me home. By this time, I was bleeding severely, and I had diarrhea.”

Randall K O’Bannon, “RU-486” National Right to Life News, January 1995

Share on Facebook

60 Minutes On The National Abortion Federation and Clinic Safety

TheNational Abortion Federation claims that they

“ensure continued high standards for safe, quality abortion care. We meet this charge in three ways: offering continuing medical education to reproductive healthcare providers, chronicling abortion related complications, and establishing standards of care.”

1991 annual report: National Abortion Federation

Mark Crutcher  “Lime 5: Exploited by Choice ” (Denton, Texas: Life Dynamics Incorporated, 1996

The CBS news show 60 Minutes had a story about a Maryland abortion clinic that killed at least two women. 60 Minutes. asked Barbara Radford, Executive Director of The National Abortion Federation, if she knew of the problems in that facility:

She said NAF was aware of them, but decided to remain silent because “This is the last thing we need. We had hoped that it wouldn’t get national publicity because of the political nature of all this.”

“60  Minutes reported that they discovered other pro-choice activists who also knew about the problems at this clinic, but who remained silent out of fear that the bad publicity would prompt state legislators to start regulating clinics. The 60 Minutes reporter, Marilyn Viero, pointed out that even though these laws could make clinics safer, abortion advocates usually fight them. This was reaffirmed when she interviewed pro-choice state senator Mary Boergers who said: “there’s only so much of a willingness to try to push a group like the pro-choice movement to do what I think is the responsible thing to do because they then treat you as if you’re the enemy.”

Mark Crutcher  “Lime 5: Exploited by Choice ” (Denton, Texas: Life Dynamics Incorporated, 1996) 106-107

“Claiming Abortion Malpractice” by Diane Gianelli. The American  Medical News 2/6/95

Share on Facebook

Woman Brings Baby’s Severed Head To Clinic

Lime 5 quoted the following story from the El Paso Times:

“Several days after [a Texas abortionist] struggled through a particularly difficult abortion, the patient’s mother returned to the abortion clinic upset and angry. She brought in a milk carton containing a 3 inch fetal head that her daughter had passed after she had massaged the girls abdomen to alleviate her pain. One employee stated, “I remember the eyes were bugging. That’s when I decided to quit.”

195 of Mark Crutcher  “Lime 5: Exploited by Choice ” (Denton, Texas: Life Dynamics Incorporated, 1996)

Share on Facebook

Woman’s Ovary Torn Loose During Abortion

The following account appeared in Mark Crutcher  “Lime 5: Exploited by Choice “ (Denton, Texas: Life Dynamics Incorporated, 1996) 26

“On February 27, 1990 “BJ” age 22, underwent an abortion by John Breaux 73. She awoke screaming during the abortion, and begged him to stop. He then had an employee clamp a hand over her mouth. She eventually went under again but awoke this time in a chair in the recovery room, with the bottom of her shirt drenched with blood. The next thing he remembered was the doctor carrying her to his car, after which a friend drove her to the hospital. A note sent by the doctor to the hospital described the abortion as “uneventful” and failed to disclose all the medications he had administered. Because the ligaments around BJ’s uterus had been severed and her right ovary torn loose, her uterus and ovaries had to be removed. The doctor who did the emergency surgery testified: “it would take a lot of force – an extreme amount of force – to do that kind of damage.” He noted that the perforation was 4 inches in length and had caused BJ to lose an incredible amount of blood. The medical board stated that, “having nearly eviscerated his patient and with her clearly in critical condition, he sent her to the hospital in a private car during rush hour… A more egregious example of incompetence and gross negligence is difficult to imagine.”

St. Louis Post-Dispatch August 2, 1992, Springfield Post-Dispatch, August 19, 1992, Missouri Administrative Hearing Commission Case Number 90 – 000255HA

Read other cases of abortion malpractice here.

Share on Facebook

Abortion and Physical Pain

“We were surprised to note that the majority of women reported moderate or more discomfort during the procedure; we had not expected as many women to report severe pain.”

Borgatta L, Nickinovich D. Pain during Early Abortion Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1997 May; 42 (5): 287 – 93

Share on Facebook

Pharmaceutical Company Refuses to Produce RU-486

Pro-Choice activists like to blame pro-lifers for delaying the approval of RU-486 in the United States, and it’s true that many pro-life organizations what it as hard as they could. But another reason that it took so long for pharmaceutical companies to start producing it had nothing to do with antiabortion pressure. Some pharmaceutical companies didn’t want to touch it because they were concerned about its effectiveness and safety.

One pharmaceutical company said that they would not produce RU-486 –

“as soon as our attorneys learn that it’s only 95% effective, they began to scream. The other 5% could involve defective children and that, in terms of liability suits, could blow us out of the water.””

Pharmaceutical company executive in the “Political History of RU-486”

Quoted in Mary E Williams. Abortion: Opposing Viewpoints (San Diego, California: Greenhaven Press, 2002)

Share on Facebook