They said it.
A woman who had an abortion claims:
“i did the least selfish thing, which was what was best for the child, not myself. i would have LOVED to have a child, i had these plans for when i wanted kids, how far apart, etc… however, when i got pregnant, it really, really was not the right time.”
Below: Pictures of abortions at 10 weeks. Is this the least selfish thing? was abortion best for these children?
One pro-abortion person wrote:
“As far as abortion is concerned, I can speak for myself in that the killing of a pre-sentient fetus does not equate to murder, any more so than the killing of a fly amounts to murder (and I can actually make the case that killing a fly is MORE heinous a moral act than permanently interrupting the development of a potential being).
In your “for instance,” killing is not necessarily moral, but it is almost certainly not immoral.”
Comment on the blog “Rationally Speaking” May 19 2006
Preborn baby at 9 weeks after abortion. Is this less wrong than killing a fly?
From one pro-abortion blogger:
Share on Facebook“March for Life, today, outside my building.
Too bad I forgot my Glock 19 at home…
The other option was to simulate a pregnancy and have Joe do a home-made abortion by punching me in the stomach mid-march, although, i get the feeling that would either result in him being arrested or stoned to death.”
The San Francisco Chronicle shows the intolerance of pro-choicers in an article about pro-life ads on trains and in train stations:
“Bay Area abortion-rights activists say a Roman Catholic group’s advertisements on hundreds of BART trains and in scores of stations — attacking the Supreme Court’s Roe vs. Wade decision and asking “Abortion: Have we gone too far?” — have gone too far in a region known for its progressive politics.
Many of the ads have been torn down or defaced since the campaign began three weeks ago.
“I think every woman has noticed them,” said Suzanne “Sam” Joi, a member of Code Pink, a social justice and anti-war group. “I couldn’t believe BART would allow something like this. Why are they doing this?”
Michael Cabanatuan “BAY AREA / Anti-abortion ad on BART angers activists / Many placards have been defaced or destroyed” San Francisco Chronicle 1/8/2006
A group opposed to war but in support of abortion makes little sense. See why abortion is just as violent as war.
Share on FacebookFrom an article in the Milwaukee –Wisconsin Journal Sentinel:
“Science has learned that a developing fetus receives messages from the mother, everything from hearing mom’s heartbeat to the music she might direct toward her belly. But a new study in the journal Psychological Science suggests that the fetus can pick up on signals and respond to a mother experiencing depression….
“We believe the human fetus is an active participant in its own development and is collecting information for life after birth,” said Curt A. Sandman, one of the authors and an emeritus professor of psychiatry and human behavior at UC-Irvine. “It’s preparing for life based on messages the mom is providing.”
Mark Johnson “Fetus can sense how Mom’s doing psychologically” Milwaukee – Wisconsin Journal Sentinel November 11, 2011
In 2015, NARAL Pro-Choice America, one of the most extreme pro-abortion groups in America, sent out a fundraising letter that called a preborn child a “baby” and admitted that a child in the womb feels pain at 20 weeks, which almost all pro-choice individuals vehemently deny.
The letter was signed by a NARAL supporter, Dana Weinstein, asking for donations to NARAL to fight HR 36, the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortions after 20 weeks (5 months).
The text was:
“When I was more than 20 weeks pregnant, my doctor discovered our baby had horrifying severe fetal anomalies that could not have been discovered earlier in pregnancy.
If I’d carried our wanted and loved baby to term, she would have survived only for a short time, in a world of immense suffering. So we chose to end our baby’s pain.”
Below is a scan of the letter.
These pro-abortion activists publicly admitted that a “fetus” is a baby and that when pro-lifers say the child can feel pain at 20 weeks, they are telling the truth.
Edward Lazarus — Former clerk to Harry Blackmun, who wrote Roe V. Wade:
“As a matter of constitutional interpretation and judicial method, Roe borders on the indefensible. I say this as someone utterly committed to the right to choose, as someone who believes such a right has grounding elsewhere in the Constitution instead of where Roe placed it, and as someone who loved Roe’s author like a grandfather….
“What, exactly, is the problem with Roe? The problem, I believe, is that it has little connection to the Constitutional right it purportedly interpreted. A constitutional right to privacy broad enough to include abortion has no meaningful foundation in constitutional text, history, or precedent - at least, it does not if those sources are fairly described and reasonably faithfully followed.”
“The Lingering Problems with Roe v. Wade, and Why the Recent Senate Hearings on Michael McConnell’s Nomination Only Underlined Them” FindLaw Legal Commentary, Oct. 3, 2002
Quoted in:
TIMOTHY P. CARNEY “In criticizing Roe, Sessions aligns with most legal scholars” Washington Examiner 1/10/17
Share on FacebookOne woman who had an abortion says:
“Phil went with me to the abortion clinic. I saw all those other women there, and I was so curious. I couldn’t help wondering why they were there and how they felt about it. People were so wonderful to us. One of the nurses really wanted to hear about Jesse [her living daughter]. I didn’t think I’d laugh that day, but when we talked about my [other] baby [who she allowed to live] we ended up laughing together. I was a little weepy during the abortion, wishing it could’ve been different, but you can’t turn back the clock…
Sure, I’ve felt sad since. It was a sad decision to have to make. But it also felt right… We really look forward to our next baby, and will do that together, too!”
Carole Dornblaser and Uta Landy, PhD The Abortion Guide: A Handbook for Women and Men (Rockville Center, New York: Playboy Paperbacks 1982) 53
The Hippocratic Oath states “I will not give a woman a pessary to cause abortion.” however, one abortionist says:
“I get absolutely no joy whatsoever doing any abortion, but we have a duty to an individual. The Catholic physician is aborting the Hippocratic Oath more than I am in not giving a woman the choice.”
Jonathan B Imber Abortion and the Private Practice of Medicine (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986) 45
Chris Kaposy, who is pro-choice but has written a book on why parents shouldn’t choose to abort babies after finding out they have down syndrome, talks about his own son, Aaron:
“At seven, Aaron is a happy little kid who enjoys playing ball hockey, watching YouTube videos, playing with his train set, and learning how to read. Aaron is especially devoted to his older sister, Elizabeth, and his younger brother, Ty. He looks forward to visits from his grandparents, and he misses them when they are not around. I put him to bed at night and get him ready for school in the morning. When I leave the house with him or walk him into school, Aaron dutifully holds my hand. At midday, Aaron eats lunch with his friends at school. To our surprise, he has learned his letters and the alphabet about as quickly as Elizabeth did, though he takes longer to learn other things, such as how to drink milk from an open cup without spilling it all over himself. In all these respects, Aaron is very much like most other children who do not have a disability. He is good at some things and not so good at others. Our lives are better with him here with us. Our feelings toward Aaron are very similar to feelings that parents and siblings have to any child who does not have a disability. I know this because I feel the same way about Elizabeth and Ty.”
Chris Kaposy Choosing down Syndrome: Ethics and New Prenatal Testing Technology (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2018) X – Xi
Share on Facebook