Doctor compares preborn babies to kids in nursery school

Dr. Frederic Frigoletto, “a pioneer on the frontier of fetal therapy” describes observing a fetus in utero as:

“almost like going to a nursery school to watch the behavior of 3-year-olds.”

Frederic Frigoletto, quoted in Lucy H Labson “Today’s View in Maternal and Fetal Medicine” Patient Care 1983, 105

Share on Facebook

Pro-Life leader: media never reports on Black women killed by abortion

Dr. Johnny Hunter, African-American pro-lifer and cofounder of L.E.A.R.N.:

“It breaks my heart that when a young man is gunned down by a [police officer], the media runs with it like wildfire. Yet, if an abortionist kills a young black woman and baby, the silence itself is tragic.”

Richard Kaye The Real War on Women (2016) 35

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choicer: women are aware of what is in their wombs

Pro-choice activist Kathleen Reeves writes about laws requiring sonograms before abortions:

“I think we can be pretty sure that a woman about to have an abortion is aware of what’s inside her womb. And in case she’s not, the doctors who counsel her before the abortion are perfectly capable of telling her….

The legislators behind these bills are arrogant in assuming they have something to say to a woman about her “womb.”

There’s no doubt that, as a woman, it’s hard to predict how you’ll feel after an abortion. But an image of the fetus sheds no light on the decision and adds nothing to the emotional process.

On the other hand, having a cadre of politicians take this image by force does add something to the experience: the sense of having been intimidated, assumed stupid, and even violated. “

Kathleen Reeves“Ultrasound Before Abortion: A Wasteful Bullying Tactic” RH Reality Check February 11, 2009

So what are women aware of that is in their wombs? Reeves refuses to come out and say.  She may be tacitly admitting that women know they are pregnant with babies, or she may only mean that women are aware of fetal development. A look at women’s stories seems to indicate otherwise.

The same stories will show that abortion workers do not give information about fetal development to women.

Seeing an image of a baby in the womb must add to the “emotional process” of the abortion decision or pro-choicers would not oppose these laws so vehemently.

Share on Facebook

Chinese woman describes pressure put on mothers to abort

Chi An is a Chinese women who took part in enforcing the one child policy in China. Now she recalls how women pregnant with “illegal” children were treated:

“A positive pregnancy test spelled trouble for a woman with a child. The representative would take the young woman aside for a series of “heart-to-heart” chats. “Have an abortion immediately,” she would be told, “and you will receive a cash bonus and a week off work.” If the woman did not respond to these inducements within the next few days, the carrot would be replaced by a stick. The woman would be told that she would not be allowed to enter her illegal child’s name on the factory’s population registers after birth, so that her child would have no medical benefits, no grain rations, no opportunity to attend school, and no chance of factory employment in the future. “For the good of your fatherland, your factory, and your family,” she would be urged, “you must “think clear” about abortion.”

If the woman resisted her representative’s warnings, activists from the Women’s Federation and the Party would step in and lend a hand. The daily chats would take on the character of struggle sessions, as the pregnant woman was attacked for her stubbornness by several activists in turn. There are heavy financial penalties for “illegal” second birth, she would be told. If she continue to resist, she would not only lose her annual bonus, but she would have to pay a heavy fine as well. The meetings also spilled over from work to home, as groups of activists visited the woman each night in her apartment. Husbands and mothers-in-law, who were often opposed to the idea of an abortion, would be required to attend these talks. “Do you want China to be backward and impoverished forever?” They would be asked. “Your individual whims in childbearing must be subject to the interest of society as a whole.”

If the woman and her family still stood their ground, the pressure would be turned up a notch. The senior leadership of the Women’s Federation and the factory Party organization would enter the fray, determined to break their will to resist. As many as a dozen officials might impose themselves on her and her family at all hours of the day and night, hectoring, blustering, threatening dire consequences. If she still insisted on having an illegal child, the local party chief would join as well. She would then hear, for the first time, the ultimate threat in China’s social welfare state: “You will lose your job if you continue to resist remedial measures.”

Stephen W Mosher A Mother’s Ordeal: One Woman’s Fight against China’s One Child Policy (Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1993) 264 – 265

Share on Facebook

Abortion doctor: We are the kindest people

An abortionist says of herself:

“I’m something of an abortion “specialist” …I perform literally hundreds of abortions a year.”

In her article, she also says:

You would never pick out an abortionist in the crowd. We would probably be the last people you would figure. We are the kindest, most compassionate people you would wish to meet.

Posted by Morgan Matthew  “Thoughts from an Abortion Doctor” Think Atheist  August 6, 2009

abortion done 10 weeks after conception
Share on Facebook

Abortion clinic worker calls adoption “violent”

Abortion clinic counselor Joss Shawyer compared:

“the traumatic results of adoptions with the comparatively simple remedy of early, safe abortion. In my view, there is no contest… Adoption is a violent act, a political act of aggression toward a woman who has supposedly offended the sexual mores by committing the unforgivable act of not suppressing her sexuality.”

Marvin Olasky “The War on Adoption” National Review June 7, 1993

Below: Abortion at 10 weeks. Is it really adoption that is violent?

week-10-18

Share on Facebook

Pro-choice activist talks about “dangers” of relying on science

A pro-abortion activist talked about how pro-choice people should not rely on science in order to defend abortion. This may be a tacit admission that all the legitimate science is on the side of the pro-lifers:

“Sally Sheldon points to the dangers that pro-choice campaigners can face if they rely on framing their arguments within the terms of medical science. The attraction is that such arguments are often perceived as “objective” and part of an approach that cites incontrovertible facts rather than opinions.

But abortion is not simply a medical or scientific issue; it is political and personal. Science does not confer bodily autonomy on women. The right to have access to abortion and birth control has had to be fought for and defended in wider society.”

Judith Orr Abortion Wars: The Fight for Reproductive Rights (Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 2017) 94

Read about what science says on when life begins.

Share on Facebook

Abortion clinic worker prefers never to look at aborted babies

In an interview, an abortion clinic worker from Paris who counsels women before their abortions, explains that she never looks at the aborted babies. She says:

“As for me, I never wanted to see it. I prefer not to look, otherwise it’s not going to help me listen to the women.”

Luc Boltanski The Foetal Condition: A Sociology of Engendering and Abortion (Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2013) 149

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choice activists harass pro-lifers

Shawn Carney wrote that after 40 days for Life got favorable coverage on TV, pro-choice activists in Santa Cruz began harassing the pro-lifers:

“Volunteers were spat upon and had water bottles thrown at them and signs ripped out of their hands. One day a young woman drove by the vigil site, honked her horn to get the volunteers’ attention, and then began a profanity laced tirade. She lifted an expressive finger through her sunroof. As she drove off, the 40 Days for Life volunteers couldn’t help but notice the bumper sticker on her car: “Tolerance.”

Shawn Carney The Beginning of the End of Abortion: 40 Inspiring Stories of God Changing Hearts and Saving Lives (Cappella Books, 2018) Kindle Edition

Share on Facebook

Pro-choicers harass 40 Days for Life participants

Shortly after the local news in Santa Cruz covered the city’s 40 Days for Life campaign, pro-choicers came out in force to harass the demonstrators:

“For the next week, several [pro-choice] protesters showed up in the afternoons wearing ghoul costumes and shouting at prayer volunteers. Throughout the vigil, volunteers were spat upon and had water bottles thrown at them and signs ripped out of their hands.”

Shawn Carney The Beginning of the End of Abortion: 40 Inspiring Stories of God Changing Hearts and Saving Lives (Cappella Books, 2018) Kindle Edition

Share on Facebook