Anesthesia Given with No Safeguards in Abortion Clinic

This quote is from Achieving Peace in the Abortion War” by Rachel M MacNair, Ph.D., published by the Feminism & Nonviolence Studies Association January 2009. (http://www.fnsa.org/apaw/)

60 Minutes did a piece called “Suzanne Logan’s Story,” about health hazards at a Maryland clinic. Ms. Logan was brain-damaged and would spend the rest of her short life in a nursing home due to anesthesia complications. She died there on December 1, 1992, after the story ran. The report showed her attorney, Patrick Malone, saying:

“The anesthesia was given without any monitoring whatsoever, without an anesthesiologist present, without a nurse anesthetist present, without the normal safeguards that are part of standard modern American medical care. I’ve seen a lot of cases, and met a lot of doctors, and reviewed a lot of records, and I’ve never seen anything like this.”

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choicers Cover for Doctor with Nine Malpractice Suits

To [abortionist Robert] Crist, the quality of abortion doctors is one of the most troubling aspects of what abortion has become….the few doctors willing to replace [those who are retiring] Crist says, are “mostly physicians who have had difficulty establishing regular ob-gyn practices.” As an example, he mentions a clinic in Nebraska where a young doctor was brought in to replace an older one.

“Out of his first six months of work, there are nine malpractice suits…After it was apparent the guy was a klutz, they kept using him, and trying to cover for him, because they couldn’t find another abortion provider. It’s a bad picture.”

St. Petersburg Times, June 3, 1990 (Quoted in Access: Key to Pro-Life Victory by Mark Crutcher Life Dynamics Inc.)

Share on Facebook

Dr. Bernard Nathanson: Physicians Staffing Clinic Were “Deplorable”

Dr. Bernard Nathanson described the clinic he ran the following way:

“The counselors were largely young radicalized college-educated women who were unapologetically feminist and regarded the largely male physician staff as the enemy. This attitude did not make for harmonious relations and the clinic, especially as the quality of the physician staff was – in a word – deplorable, consisting of an extra ordinary variety of drunks, druggies, sadists, sexual molesters, just plain incompetents, and medical losers. At least one was a fugitive from justice, with the FBI close on his tail.”

Nathanson, Bernard N, M.D The Hand of God: a Journey from Death to Life by the Abortion Doctor Who Changed His Mind (Washington DC: Regnery Publishing Inc, 1996) 104

Share on Facebook

Horrific Conditions in an Abortion Clinic

Former abortionist Dr. Bernard Nathanson recalls a conversation he had with a clinic worker:

“One more thing. You got to get those doctors shaped up. I mean half of them don’t even wash their hands anymore before doing an abortion, let alone scrubbing. They refuse to use masks or caps, and their mustaches are dragging into the suction machines. I swear, one of these days we’re going to lose one of those guys right into the suction trap and the lab is going to tell us the tissue is pregnancy tissue and the abortion is complete. One guy refuses to take the cigar out of his mouth while doing abortions. Even the counselors are not THAT crazy…

Our garbage problem is impossible, and its getting worse every day. I mean, there are these huge piles of our stuff stacked up in the hallway. Man, we use a lot of disposables, and the building refuses to help us with it except to make the usual garbage rounds once a day. Anyway, they don’t want to handle it because its all bloody and all.”

Bernard N. Nathanson MD “Aborting America” New York: Doubleday Company 1979, p 99

Share on Facebook

Elizabeth Blackwell On Abortion

Elizabeth Blackwell was the first American woman to earn it M.D. her decision to become a doctor was prompted, at least in part, by her passionate opposition to abortion. After learning of the New York abortionist Mdm.Restell, she wrote in her diary:

“The gross perversion and destruction of motherhood by the abortionist filled me with indignation and awakened active antagonism. That the honorable term “female physician” should be exclusively applied to those women who carry on this shocking trade seemed to me a horror. It was an utter degradation of what might and should become a noble position for women… I finally determined to do what I could to “redeem the hells” and especially that one form of hell thus forced upon my notice.”

Ironically, at least one United States abortion provider named their clinic the Elizabeth Blackwell Center, despite the pro-life stance of their namesake.

Quoted in “Swimming Against the Tide: Feminist Dissent on the Issue of Abortion” edited by Angela Kennedy (Dublin, Ireland: Four Courts Press, 1997) 15

Original source Ross, I. “Child of Destiny: the Life Story Of the First Woman Doctor” (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1949) 88

Share on Facebook

Mary Wollstonecraft On Abortion

Mary Wollstonecraft

As early as 1792, Mary Wollstonecraft wrote “A Vindication of the Rights of Women,” which Susan B. Anthony admired enough to serialize in The Revolution. After decrying, in scathing 18th century terms, the sexual exploitation of women, she stated:

“Women becoming, consequently, weaker…than they ought to be…have not sufficient strength to discharge the first duty of a mother; and sacrificing to lasciviousness the parental affection…either destroy the embryo in the womb, or cast if off when born. Nature in every thing demands respect, and those who violate her laws seldom violate them with impunity.”

Share on Facebook

Mattie Brinkerhoff on abortion

Mattie Brinkerhoff

“When a man steals to satisfy hunger, we may safely conclude that there is something wrong in society – so when a woman destroys the life of her unborn child, it is an evidence that either by education or circumstances she has been greatly wronged.” ,

The Revolution, September 2, 1869, pages 138 and 139.

Share on Facebook

Sarah Norton on Abortion

Sarah Norton

“Child murderers practice their profession without let or hindrance, and open infant butcheries unquestioned…Is there no remedy for all this ante-natal child murder?…Perhaps there will come a time when…an unmarried mother will not be despised because of her motherhood…and when the right of the unborn to be born will not be denied or interfered with.”

Woodhull’s and Claffin’s Weekly, November 19, 1870

Share on Facebook

Elizabeth Cady Stanton on Abortion

Elizabeth Cady Stanton

“When we consider that woman are treated as property, it is degrading to women that we should treat our children as property to be disposed of as we see fit.”

Letter to Julia Ward Howe, October 16, 1873, recorded in Howe’s diary at Harvard University Library

She classified abortion as a form of “infanticide.” The Revolution, 1(5):1, February 5, 1868

Also from Stanton:

“Dr. Oaks made the remark that, according to the best estimate he could make, there were four hundred murders annually produced by abortion in this county alone….There must be a remedy to such a crying evil as this. But where should it be found, at least begin, if not in the complete enfranchisement and elevation of women?”

The Revolution 1(10) 146-147 March 12, 1868

Cited in Rachel McNair, Mary Krane Derr, and Linda Naranjo-Hubbl. Pro-Life Feminism: Yesterday and Today (New York: Sulzburger & Graham Publishing, Ltd.)

Note: although Elizabeth Cady Stanton emphatically believe that abortion was murder, she was compassionate towards women who were in desperate circumstances. She successfully advocated for the release and pardon of a woman convicted of infanticide in the death of her newborn baby.

 

Share on Facebook

Victoria Woodhull On Abortion

Victoria Woodhull

“Every woman knows if she were free, she would never bear an unwished-for child, nor think of murdering one before its birth.”

Woodhull was the nation’s first female presidential candidate, who ran under the banner of the Equal Rights Party in 1872. Wheeling, West Virginia Evening Standard, November 17, 1875

*****

“We are aware that many women attempt to excuse themselves for procuring abortions, upon the ground that it is not murder. But the fact of resort to so weak an argument only shows the more palpably that they fully realize the enormity of the crime. Is it not equally destroying the would-be future oak to crush the sprout before it pushes its head above the sod, as to cut down the sapling, or cut down the tree? Is it not equally to destroy life, to crush it in the very germ, and to take it when the germ has evolved to any given point in its line of development?”

Victoria Woodhull and Tennessee Claflin – Woodhull and Claflin’s Weekly, 20 June 1874

Share on Facebook