Founder of NARAL Seeks to use Minority Women

Dr. Bernard Nathanson was instrumental in making abortion legal in New York in the 1970s. He was the cofounder of NARAL, then the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws, now NARAL Pro-Choice America. He described how the pro-choice activists, who were mostly white and upper class, wanted to appeal to the masses by having “token” minorities in the public eye:

Nathanson quotes Laurence Lader, his cofounder of NARAL:

“We’ve got to keep the women out in front…. And some blacks. Black women especially. Why are they so damn slow to see the importance of this whole movement to themselves?”

Bernard N Nathanson, M.D. with Richard N Ostling. Aborting America (Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company, 1979) 53

Share on Facebook

Young African-American Women Often Coerced into Abortions By Counselors

According to one pro-choice author:

“Among medical professionals and social workers, teenagers are perhaps most likely to encounter people with more liberal views about abortion, and to find themselves on the defensive if they are determined to continue their pregnancies… pregnant women whose cultures or circumstances do not fit… are disapproved of as candidates for motherhood. Tacit disapproval sometimes becomes vocal — urging the woman towards abortion and, if she insists on keeping the pregnancy, castigating her for her “irrational” selfishness…Black teenagers, in particular, are singled out by the medical and social work profession as “problem parents”… outright coercion or bullying is hard to prove, but, undoubtedly, young mothers, poor mothers, and above all poor young black mothers are being hustled towards abortion with no respect for their “right to choose.”

Janet Hadley “Abortion: between Freedom and Necessity” (Great Britain: Virago Press) 1996 p 104, 106

Share on Facebook

Former Employee Sues Planned Parenthood for Racial Discrimination

According to Texas Business Today’s (Summer 1999) coverage of US Court of Appeals for 5th Circuit; Case # 97-11310, Fadeyi v. Planned Parenthood, Lamarilyn Fadeyi is an African Amerian female who was employed by Planned Parenthood for seven years.

She alleged that Planned Parenthood engaged in various acts of racial discrimination against her during the course of her employment, ranging from discriminatory scheduling and distribution of office resources, to the executive director’s giving her and another black employee an application for membership in the Ku Klux Klan. Fadeyi filed complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Texas Commission on Human Rights, but both dismissed her complaints for lack of jurisdiction because Planned Parenthood had fewer than 15 employees at all relevant times.

Planned Parenthood fired Fadeyi two working days after receiving notification that the EEOC did not have jurisdiction to entertain her complaints. Fadeyi then brought suit in district court alleging racial discrimination in her employment and termination.

Credit: Life Dymanics

Share on Facebook

Women Are “Very Good” At Blaming Others, Says Clinic Worker

Abortion clinic worker Martha Mueller (she works at a Planned Parenthood facility in Brooklyn):

“Some think that the legalization of abortion has opened a Pandora’s Box of faulty decision making. When abortion was illegal, here was a common enemy in the form of the law. Now that abortion is primarily a matter of choice, the decision rests entirely on the shoulders of the woman, a decision many would rather not have to make. Some blame their husbands or boyfriends for “forcing” them to have the abortion. Others point their anger at parents, who have insisted on the abortion or who, the patients maintain, would be furious if they found out their daughter was pregnant. “He did it to me” is a phrase heard often in the clinic or hospital corridors when the doctor walks by. That’s moving the responsibility. Women are very good at that.”

Emphasis mine.

So we see that women must bear the brunt of their ‘decision’ even if they have been coerced by others.

From the book “Rachel Weeping and Other Essays About Abortion” Ed. by James Tunstead Burtchaell (Life Cycle Books June 1991) p 14

Share on Facebook

Heartbroken Mother’s Letter to the District Attorney Asks for Justice

The African American mother of a woman who died at an Inglewood abortion clinic wrote a heartfelt plea for justice in a letter to former District Attorney for Los Angeles Ira Reiner:

“I am the mother of Belinda A. Byrd, victim of abortionists at 426 East 99th Street in Inglewood. I am also the grandmother of her three young children who are left behind and motherless. I cry every day when I think how horrible her death was. She was slashed by them and then she bled to death, taken from this world on January 27,1987. She has been stone dead for two years now, and nobody cares. I know that other young black women are now dead after abortion at that address — Cora Mae Lewis and Yvonne Tanner. Where is [the abortionist] now? Has he been stopped? Has anything happened to him because of what he did to my Belinda? Has he served jail time for any of these cruel deaths? People tell me nothing has happened, that nothing ever happens to white abortionists who leave young black women dead. I’m hurting real bad and want some justice for Belinda and all other women who go like sheep to slaughter.”

Share on Facebook

Clinic Escort Service at Odds with Dr. Tiller

Former clinic employee Luhra Tivis mentioned that the person in charge of the escort service organized by the local NOW at Dr. Tiller’s clinic “stopped the escort service because she went with him while he did some abortions, accompanied him, and didn’t like the way he treated the women. Real rough, and arrogant, and not respecting their privacy.”

MacNair says:

That NOW chapter still refused to run an article against him in their local newsletter, however. There was no warning to women of what they were facing to come from them

Share on Facebook

Decisive Vote in Legalizing Abortion Was Due to Racism

In his book “Abortion: A Doctor’s Perspective, a Woman’s Dilemma” abortion provider Don Sloan tells a story about when he was lobbying the New York State legislature on lifting abortion restrictions:

“We had needed only a single precious vote to go our way, and one conservative upstate lawmaker had switched his vote at the last minute.” A colleague said the vote had gone their way because the legislator was counting on abortion to limit the number of poor babies and keep the welfare rolls down. “‘It was part people who want to put abortion into the medical code where it belongs and part racism.’ . . . I hated to think that abortion reform had come out of such a philosophy, but I knew plenty of people saw abortion as a way to control the poor. . . Ending poverty would never be so simple as getting rid of poor babies. But if indeed that had been the reason behind the vote, it wouldn’t have been new in history.

Don Sloan, M.D. with Paula Hartz, Abortion: A Doctor’s Perspective, A Woman’s Dilemma. (New York: Donald I Fine, Inc., 1992 p 41.

Share on Facebook

Abortionist on Latino Patients

“Latino women are some of the best patients [for abortions.] They come in and they don’t complain. Sometimes they are given abortions when they’re not even pregnant.”

Alfred Brown, M.D. of Los Angeles quoted in April 1998 Los Angeles Times report on abortion “chop shops” that exloit minority women. Quoted in Paul Likoudis “California Political Races Reflect “Catholic Diversity” The Wanderer October 15, 1998

Share on Facebook

Abortion Clinic Administrators Don’t Support Pregnant Employees

In Abortion at Work, author Wendy Simonds interviewed clinic workers. They discussed how the clinic administrators dealt with pregnant employees:

One clinic worker is quoted saying:

“Audrey hasn’t been getting the support she needed after she got pregnant, and she felt like people didn’t want her to be pregnant by this guy because she was a lesbian before, and that she was totally confused, and just all that kind of stuff….and then Glenda, before she got her job as supervisor, apparently they asked her if she was planning to get pregnant or not, because she was going to have to take leave, and it was going to totally mess up the supervisors…It’s just like, please, if somebody wants to have a baby, then we need to be supportive and work around that, you know, but not let it interfere with their career tracks.”

On the same page the author states:

“Though the center directors took pride in their acceptance of ‘choice’ as a central tenant of feminist health care practice, the Center had no policies that demonstrated support for employees who decided to procreate…when it became [an impediment to work] administrators disapproved. Women typically took two or three months of unpaid leave after their babies were born…some women complained that the managers were not willing to accommodate…their responsibilities to their children.”

Abortion at Work: Ideology and Practice in a Feminist Clinic by Wendy Simonds, (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ., 1996) 152-153

Share on Facebook

Abortion Worker: The Clinic Administrators Exploit Us

A worker at an abortion clinic was quoted saying:

“They [the administrators] have this pin that says “The Woman’s Care Center: Working for the Lives of Women” or something. They do, but not for the lives of the women that work there. They exploit women who work there, and they abuse them…It’s just like working for someone who’s sexist. You have to be “in” to be treated fairly…which I think is not right.”

Abortion at Work: Ideology and Practice in a Feminist Clinic by Wendy Simonds, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ., 1996 146

Share on Facebook