Chinese worker describes enforcing one child policy

Chinese nurse “Chi An” had a job enforcing the one child policy in China. She emigrated to the United States and wrote a book about her experiences. In this quote, she describes coercing women to abort their “illegal” children.

“The unpleasant part began in the second half of January and was an unending and often exhausting struggle from then until the end of the year. Identifying the women who conceived children outside the plan was hard enough, requiring me to perform public examinations on all those suspected of being pregnant. Pressuring women who were pregnant with “illegal” children to get abortions was even more time-consuming. Even though I had the help of the Women’s Federation, there were still dozens of women who remained unswayed by “heart-to-heart” chats. The hard cases were now my responsibility, and there were not enough hours in the day to deal with all of them…

I asked Secretary Chen if we could order them all to attend a single family planning study session. He readily agreed. Our first session was held in April, in an isolated storeroom far removed from all the shops and dormitories.

We used what in Party parlance were “hard and soft” tactics – known in the West as the “good cop, bad cop” approach. Secretary Chen and other senior officials would first frighten the women with harsh threats of dire consequences for failing to abide by the one child policy. Then, speaking softly and as a friend, I would tell them that I was there to help. I was an expert at convincing women to abort – I had learned all the arguments during my earlier training at the hospital – and my gentleness help to break down their resistance. Those who angrily resisted Secretary Chen’s bluster often broke down in tears when approached by someone they thought was sympathetic. I would put my arm around them, and they would go quietly to the hospital.

Throughout 1983, each time the number of women awaiting abortions reached 20 or so, I would schedule a study session. The holdouts would be ordered, on pain of heavy fines, to report to the storeroom. To increase the pressure on the women, I obtained Secretary Chen’s permission to keep them in custody for as long as they resist. During the day they would be subjected to morning to night study sessions.  At night they would be locked in the storeroom. They would  only be released if they agreed to an abortion.”

Stephen W Mosher A Mother’s Ordeal: One Woman’s Fight against China’s One Child Policy (Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1993) 267 – 268

Share on Facebook

Commentary on “Why I Decided against Late-Term Abortion” by Eve Cohen

Christina Dunigan writes about a 2009 article entitled Why I Decided Against a Late-Term Abortion, by Alice Eve Cohen. Unfortunately, the article does not appear to still be up.

However, I think Dunigan’s post is valuable and I’m going to reproduce it with her permission.

****

Eve Cohen didn’t think she could get pregnant. Doctors had told her not to even try because they were sure that she’d not be able to carry past six months. So when she discovered, at six months, that she was pregnant, she freaked out, to the point of considering suicide.

Instead of sending her for psychiatric care, “an abortion specialist” made an appointment for her to get the unexpected baby snuffed at Tiller’s Wichita abortion mill as a “life of the mother” case.

The baby’s father didn’t think he could stay with her if he did that. When asked about the upcoming abortion, he said:

“Me? Oh, Jesus … a lot of different things,” Michael answered. “I’ve seen Alice in the throes of this terrible unhappiness, and I don’t recognize her.

I’ve been politically in favor of choice, but uncommitted on the personal side — it’s been an abstraction. But now that this is suddenly so real, all I can think is that there’s a baby. Our baby. My baby. And I can’t stand the thought of this baby being aborted.

So If Alice has an abortion, I won’t go to Wichita with her. And I might not be here when she gets back. I’ll have my own unbearable sorrow about losing this baby, about endorsing this decision. But I don’t want Alice to kill herself. So she should do what she needs to do.”


Cohen doesn’t really get it:

For the past ten years, this turning point moment in our relationship — Michael acknowledging my right to choose, but telling me he might leave me if I had the abortion — has remained a largely unspoken but crucial shared memory, equal parts rift and bridge between us.

Somehow it seems to diminish him in her eyes that it would have devastated him to have his child put to death. That he loved the child unconditionally is, in her eyes, a big problem. What redeemed him was that he “acknowledg[ed]” her “right to choose” whether the baby would live or die. 

As if he had any way of stopping her.

When Cohen wrote a book about, among other things, contemplating abortion, she let her 9-year-old daughter read it. The daughter was okay with it, “Because I know how it turns out.” As if a child would say anything else! What’s she going to say? 

It took the wisdom of our child, confident in her parents’ love, to clarify this truth — that exercising freedom of choice is nothing to be ashamed of.


Maybe she wasn’t so much confident of her parents’ love as she was aware of the fact that to even tacitly question mom’s “right to choose” would destroy whatever fragile, conditional love her mother had for her.

And note the author’s tone about the whole thing. No hint of a chill running up and down her spine over how close she came to killing this child. Just a smug satisfaction that in having the baby, rather than killing her, she “exercis[ed] freedom of choice”.

At least the child has one parent who values her inherently and unconditionally, and not merely as the product of a “choice”.

And the fact that the child’s value to her is only in having been “chosen”, and not in merely being, really is something Ms. Cohen should be ashamed of.

Share on Facebook

Chinese abortion clinic advertises 50% off abortions for students

The ad below shows a Chinese abortion clinic offering students 50% off on their abortions.

abortion_ad623x362

Translated, the ad says:

Students are our future, but when something happens to them, who will help and protect them? Chongqing Huaxi Women’s Hospital has started Students Care Month, where those students who come to get an abortion can get 50% off if they show their student ids. Abortion surgeries are the most advanced in the world, won’t stretch (your womb), won’t hurt, it’s quick, and you can do what you want afterward, it won’t affect your studies or your work.

Apparently, the babies in the womb are not part of China’s future. Thanks for JivenJehoshaphat for providing this quote.

Share on Facebook

A conversion outside an abortion clinic

This is from an article about abortion clinic manager turned pro-lifer Abby Johnson. She relates a story of conversion.

She described one encounter with a man named Tom outside a different abortion clinic after Johnson had begun pro-life activism. Although Tom regularly showed up alongside the pro-life protesters, he was not with them: in fact, he held up a piece of posterboard with the word “pro-choice” on it. Johnson spoke to Tom and learned that he was the grandfather of an aborted child.

“And I thought, okay, this is a man that’s hurting, and we need to reach out and minister to him,” she said. She took the opportunity to share several news articles on abortion, saying, “I want you to do the research on this yourself.”

“He read them over,” said Johnson. “He came back the next day. And he walked up to me without his sign, and said, I just wanted to let you know that I’ll never be coming out here again as someone who’s pro-choice.”

“What we write, what we say, our actions, are bringing about conversion, and it’s happening almost every day.”

Kathleen Gilbert “Pro-life TV ad cut abortions at clinic by almost half: former Planned Parenthood director” LifeSiteNews May 10, 2012

Share on Facebook

Top 4 Reasons Women Give for Having an Abortion

Top reasons women gave for having abortions (women could pick more than one) according to the most recent info:

74% said that the baby would change their life too much

73% said that babies were too expensive

48% didn’t want to raise the child alone

32% did not want another child

Less than 1% for rape or incest

Finer LP et al., “Reasons US Women Have Abortions: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2005 37 (3): 10 – 118

I will leave it to the reader to decide whether these are sufficient reasons or not.

Below: 1st trimester (9-10 week) preborn baby (see what this baby would look like after the most common type of abortion, a suction curettage)

First trimester (9 to 10 week) preborn baby
First trimester (9 to 10 week) preborn baby
Share on Facebook

Study gives reasons teens don’t tell their parents about pregnancy

“One study cited the 3 most common reasons why young pregnant women had abortions without telling their parents. They were, in order, “Didn’t want to hurt or disappoint parent,” “Thought parent would be angry at me,” and “Didn’t want parents to know I was having sex.”

Allison Landes et. al, eds., Abortion: an Eternal Social and Moral Issue (Wylie, TX: Information Plus, 1996) 104

Quoted in Stephen Currie Abortion (San Diego, California: Greenhaven Press, 2000)

Pro-choicer’s argue that only children who are abused at home will not tell their parents. That is why they oppose consent laws, they say. These are the true, most common reasons teens have abortions without telling their parents.

Share on Facebook

Pro-aborts defend woman who illegally took abortion pills to kill 5 1/2 month old baby boy

This article is taken from Saynsumthin’s Blog with permission

REPUBLISHED FROM LIFE DYNAMICS BLOG

A Georgia woman who allegedly took an abortion pill she purchased off the internet to abort a five-and-a-half-month-old baby boy has been charged in the child’s death and abortion advocates have come to her defense.

kenlissia-jones

According to reports published by a local media outlet, police say that 23-year-old Kenlissa Jones purchased Cytotec, from a source in Canada.

The drug, also known as Misoprostol, is promoted by abortion advocates in home abortion remedies online.

Reports indicate that Jones got a neighbor to take her to the hospital, but she delivered the baby boy in the car on the way.

Dougherty County police say that Jones’ baby boy died after about half an hour at the hospital and have now charged Jones with malice murder and possession of a dangerous drug. Jones’ brother, Rico Riggins, told WALB that he did not know his sister was pregnant.

Kenlissia-Jones-Riggins

“Once she took those pills, from the way I’m understanding it, she was in a world of hurt for a while,” Riggins said.

Riggins said his family is grieving and in need of prayers.

“We lost what would have been a nephew for me. And everything. And then my sister,” Jones’ brother said.

Dougherty County District Attorney Greg Edwards said the case will likely go before a grand jury, because Georgia and federal laws will need to be explored.

According to Georgia law:

No abortion is authorized or shall be performed if the probable gestational age of the unborn child has been determined in accordance with Code Section 31-9B-2 to be 20 weeks or more unless the pregnancy is diagnosed as medically futile, as such term is defined in Code Section 31-9B-1, or in reasonable medical judgment the abortion is necessary to avert the death of the pregnant woman or avert serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman. O.C.G.A. § 16-12-141 (2014)

WALB.com, South Georgia News, Weather, Sports

This is not the first time a woman has been charged after ordering and consuming drugs to self-induce an abortion.

Earlier this year a 33-year-old Indiana woman was sentenced to 20 years in prison on feticide and neglect charges after she took abortion pills she had ordered to abort her roughly thirty (30) week pregnancy.

Purvi-Patel-Charged-with-Baby-Death9-0132-0831-0eae5eefacd9-Thumb

The woman, Purvi Patel then threw the almost fully developed baby into a dumpster behind a restaurant her family owns where the infant died.

Abortion advocates wasted no time coming to Purvi’s defense. (read here.)

Life Dynamics president, Mark Crutcher called Patel’s defenders, savages, saying that abortion advocates never met a baby they didn’t want to kill.

Crutcher pointed out that had Patel’s baby been found in the dumpster of an abortion clinic, no charges would have been filed,

“The fact is, if the body of this child had been found in the dumpster of an abortion clinic instead of the dumpster of a restaurant this arrest would have never happened and Patel would just be another enlightened woman exercising her constitutional right to choose,”

he stated at the time of Patel’s arrest.

Now, abortion advocates are rushing to the aid of Kenlissa.

Kenlissia-Jones-abortion-supporters-2

Kenlissia-Jones-abortion-supporters-

On twitter they have set up the twitter hashtag #justiceforKenlissa to defend Kenlissa’ actions.

No page has been established to grieve her dead son, though.

This baby is five months old. The baby aborted by was even more developed
This baby is five months old. The baby aborted Jones by was even more developed

.

 

 

 

Share on Facebook

Abortion clinic’s business declines by 50% after pro-life commercial airs

An article in LifeSiteNews told of the impact a pro-life commercial had on the business of one abortion clinic. Abby Johnson, the former manager of a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic in Texas, was interviewed. The article said:

“Johnson described the impact of one pro-life television advertisement campaign that criticized her own Planned Parenthood clinic in Bryan, Texas. Everyone working at the clinic, she says, had seen the ad – and apparently, so had many women who might have had abortions there.

The article quotes Johnson herself saying:

“Our numbers declined almost 50 percent while that campaign was running. “Why?

“Because pro-life media works.”

Kathleen Gilbert “Pro-life TV ad cut abortions at clinic by almost half: former Planned Parenthood director” LifeSiteNews May 10, 2012

Share on Facebook

A sidewalk counselor tells her story of a “save”

In 2011, Live Action News published an article by a sidewalk counselor who describes an encounter with the friend of a woman going in for an abortion:

10 weeks
10 weeks

Around ten, two young women drove into the parking lot.  When they got out of the car, I offered the information on local pregnancy resource centers to them, asking if I could help them in any way.  The girl with the appointment (you can tell by the way they’re dressed), whom I’ll call Courtney, hurried towards the facility.  Courtney’s friend, whom I’ll call Lanie, came over and talked to me.

Lanie eagerly took the information and told me she would show this to her friend inside.  Before she walked away, she said “thank you for being out here.”  It shocked me—I had never been thanked by a client or an escorting friend or family member before!’

……..

She showed me a leaflet for a Rachel’s Vineyard retreat and asked where they were located.  At this point, a fellow sidewalk counselor, Elizabeth, had approached us, and she explained to Lanie the different opportunities to attend the retreats around our state, and the Bible studies that are held to help women heal from past abortions.  Lanie opened her mouth to respond, then put her hand to her eyes and choked up, apologizing.

She admitted to us that she had had an abortion ten years before because her mother told her she had no other option…

Lanie cried, “Why couldn’t you guys have been there when I was going to get my abortion…” and said she never would have done it if she knew she could have had help

Lanie went back into the facility and convinced her friend not to have an abortion – they both left, and the unborn baby was saved.

Sidewalk Counseling: My Story of a Child Saved” Live Action August 22, 2011

 

Share on Facebook

Baby aborted alive at 9 months in forced abortion in China

LifeSiteNews published this picture of an aborted baby from China.  The child was nine months along when he or she was aborted.  The baby was a victim of China’s forced abortion regime, the One Child Policy (which now allows couples to sometimes have two children, but definitely not more) .

china_baby_460_345_55

From the LifeSiteNews article:

According to English reports regarding the original post, the pregnant mother was forcibly held down as she was given an injection to induce labor, after which the baby “even gave a cry when it came out,” but was left in a bucket to drown.

Kathleen Gilbert “Photo of baby aborted in China at 9 months in forced abortion circulates on Internet, sparks outrage” LifeSiteNews Apr 3, 2012

Share on Facebook