Woman in Malpractice Suit Devastated by Her Abortion

An article on abortion malpractice discusses lawsuits against various clinics. Here is one lawsuit from a woman who had a hard time dealing with her abortion:

Case One

D. had a first trimester abortion to hide the fact that she was having sex with someone other than her mate. She felt she had no other choice. She did not receive any pre-abortion counseling. After the procedure she found herself thinking about the abortion hundreds of times during the day. When she had her menstrual period, she would save whatever blood clots that passed into the toilet and place them in glass bottles every month. She hoped for another pregnancy both as an attempt to “undo” the abortion and to “replace” her lost child. In addition, she had nightmares and suffered from depression and unrelenting guilt.

“Abortion Malpractice: When Patient Needs an Abortion Practice Collide”A.I.R.V.S.C. Association for Interdisciplinary Research in Values and Social Change Research Bulletin Vol. 9 No.1 November/December 1995

Share on Facebook

6 Pound Aborted Baby Expelled in Toilet

The affidavit of an employee from Midtown Hospital, which was once the largest abortion clinic in Georgia, says the following:

“On April 18, 1998, at approximately 7:00 a.m., I witnessed a patient deliver an intact fetus in the toilet of a bathroom in the waiting room area. After expelling the baby and the afterbirth, the patient walked to the operating room because there were no wheelchairs. I opened the fetal sac so that the fetus could be weighed. The weight was approximately 3029 grams [over 6 pounds, 10 ounces!]. It was a very big fetus. My impression is that at Midtown Hospital a procedure will be done at any gestational age as long as the patient has the money. I witnessed patients frequently expelling fetuses on the floor and in the toilet. It happened frequently throughout each day the abortion procedures were done. … Women are allowed to expel fetuses whenever and wherever with no concern for the patient. When I would attempt to comfort the women, I was told that this was not my job.”

This particular clinic was eventually closed, but only after operating for years. Read more information about it here.

According to the clinics ad in “Abortion Clinics Online” a database which supposedly lists only reputable clinics:

“Midtown Hospital has stood for quality healthcare since its founding in the early 1900s. … In 1977, the focus of that outstanding care changed when Midtown Hospital became a women’s medical facility offering a full spectrum of gynecological healthcare services and the tradition of unsurpassed excellence remained. … Today, Midtown Hospital is a rare facility, providing the medical profession and patients with nationally-recognized programs in second trimester abortions for medical and genetic studies. … Midtown is an invaluable resource to referring universities, hospitals and private physicians. … Every abortion is overseen by a Board Certified pathologist. Whether a patient is treated as an out-patient or is admitted for an overnight stay, she receives experienced, professional care in a warm and comfortable environment. Although Midtown Hospital strives to maintain reasonable costs, the staff never cuts corners on laboratory tests, medical care, counseling, personal attention or follow-up care. Midtown Hospital is licensed by the State of Georgia. All physicians are Board Certified and all other medical staff are fully licensed. In addition, our staff is trained in and dedicated to meeting the personal, emotional and physical needs of our patients. It is in this spirit that we preserve the dignity of our patients and provide uncompromised medical care in an atmosphere of comfort and caring.” (Emphasis supplied.)

“Men Behaving Really Badly” Life Insight, A Publication of the NCCB Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, volume 9, no. 8 October 1998

Share on Facebook

The Debacle of Midtown Hospital

Even if an abortion clinic is listed with the National Abortion Federation and endorsed by Planned Parenthood, it doesn’t mean that the clinic is clean and offers quality healthcare. Midtown hospital was eventually closed down, but until it was, it was the biggest abortion clinic in Georgia. It was an NAF member.

This is the ad for the clinic on abortionclinicsonline, a national database which is supposed to list only “quality” clinics.

Midtown Hospital has stood for quality healthcare since its founding in the early 1900s. … In 1977, the focus of that outstanding care changed when Midtown Hospital became a women’s medical facility offering a full spectrum of gynecological healthcare services and the tradition of unsurpassed excellence remained. … Today, Midtown Hospital is a rare facility, providing the medical profession and patients with nationally-recognized programs in second trimester abortions for medical and genetic studies. … Midtown is an invaluable resource to referring universities, hospitals and private physicians. … Every abortion is overseen by a Board Certified pathologist. Whether a patient is treated as an out-patient or is admitted for an overnight stay, she receives experienced, professional care in a warm and comfortable environment. Although Midtown Hospital strives to maintain reasonable costs, the staff never cuts corners on laboratory tests, medical care, counseling, personal attention or follow-up care. Midtown Hospital is licensed by the State of Georgia. All physicians are Board Certified and all other medical staff are fully licensed. In addition, our staff is trained in and dedicated to meeting the personal, emotional and physical needs of our patients. It is in this spirit that we preserve the dignity of our patients and provide uncompromised medical care in an atmosphere of comfort and caring.” (Emphasis supplied.)

In reality, the state inspected the clinic several times and found deficiencies. The Georgia Department of Human Resources allowed Midtown to continue to operate despite repeated on-site investigations which showed “a complete disregard for, or the inability to care for, the health and safety of its patients” (Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief filed May 20, 1998). On May 22, 1998 Midtown Hospital was temporarily closed by a Superior Court judge pending the outcome of litigation to shut it permanently. Were it not for a short account of the clinic’s closing in the Local News section of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (May 23), no one would be the wiser.

 Paragraph 2 of the Complaint against Midtown neatly summarizes the charges.

“Inspections of Midtown Hospital by DHR staff, interviews with current and former employees of Midtown Hospital, and interviews with women who have been patients at Midtown Hospital reveal an overcrowded, understaffed and dirty health care facility that jeopardizes the health and safety of its patients. For example, overcrowding and lack of proper monitoring of patients results in the expulsion of fetuses on the floor and in the commode of the preoperative area; Midtown Hospital’s sterilization process to prevent the spread of infection is severely deficient; Midtown Hospital’s personnel files lack any evidence that many of its employees are qualified for their jobs; and Midtown Hospital lacks any system for identifying, documenting, or evaluating unexpected or negative patient outcomes. DHR staff has consistently found that Midtown Hospital’s records lack information regarding transfer of patients to other facilities due to complications arising during or after surgical procedures performed at Midtown Hospital.”

According to the Affidavit of “Employee A,” employed at Midtown Hospital from November 1996 to February 1998:

“The preoperative room is located near the room where I was stationed. I could hear the patients hollering and screaming in the preoperative room. … I saw patients laying on the floor crying in pain. … I routinely saw patients expel fetuses on the floor and in the commode in the preoperative room. Patients expelled fetuses in front of other patients that were awaiting procedures. Patients expelled fetuses in commodes that were used by other patients. … I regularly observed patients expel fetuses in the commode in the discharge area. … Oftentimes, I was the only staff member in that area to assist patients. I do not have medical training.”

Employee B is a certified surgical technician, employed at Midtown Hospital from March 30, 1998 until resigning on April 18, 1998. Her affidavit states:

“I never saw the doctors or the anesthesiologist do any pre-operative work-ups on the patients prior to the patients going into the operating room. … Sterilization standards are not followed. … Most women lay on the floor in the pre-op area. Once I attempted to get some sterile sheets for the patients to lay on and was told by the Operating Room supervisor that if “they can lay up and get pregnant then they can come in here and deal with the procedure.” I have witnessed the use of stretchers with blood and bodily fluids on them being re-used without being cleaned. The staff was not concerned about cleaning up blood and other bodily fluids from the floors, chairs, stretchers and bathrooms and did not do so.”

The Affidavit of Patient X describes her experience on April 16, 1998. Following her procedure, she experienced”extreme pain … nausea, vomiting and even more pain.” This continued for several days. She called Midtown Hospital at least twice to speak to a doctor or nurse, but was told to make an appointment. Finally, she called 911 and was transported to a local hospital where they diagnosed an incomplete abortion. The Brief refers to other patients who were transfer-red to a hospital for “complications” occurring at Midtown

source:

“Men Behaving Really Badly” Life Insight, A Publication of the NCCB Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, volume 9, no. 8 October 1998

.

Share on Facebook

Women Want to Know Risks of Having an Abortion

In a study entitled “Women’s preferences for information and complication seriousness ratings related to elective medical procedures” in the August 2006 edition of the Journal of Medical Ethics, 95% of women surveyed claimed that they would want to know all of the risks of elective medical procedures, including abortion, before agreeing to that procedure. According to an article on the study:

Priscilla Coleman, David Reardon, and Matthew Lee, the study of a diverse sample of 187 largely low-income women seeking obstetric and gynecological services found that they overwhelmingly wanted to be informed of all known risks associated with elective procedures in general and with abortion in particular….

The study revealed that 95% of the women surveyed at the St. Joseph Regional Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, expressed a desire to be informed of all possible complications associated with elective medical procedures, including abortion. This was found to be true regardless of how common or uncommon the particular complications were.

Study Reveals Women Want Information on Abortion Risks, NRL News Volume 33 Issue 9 September 2006 Page 20

Pro-Choice organizations usually oppose informed consent laws, which require clinics to inform women about the risks of abortion procedures prior to performing them.

Share on Facebook

Abortion Provider: John Biskind

Abortionist John Biskind of A-Z Women’s Center in Phoenix first came under scrutiny when he botched a partial birth abortion he was attempting to perform on a baby that was full-term. He had examined the mother and determined that the baby was 23 weeks old, within the timeframe of a partial birth abortion.

The baby was born alive, but the abortionist had fractured her skull and lacerated her face. She survived.

When this “terrible” complication (terrible only because the baby survived – it would have been fine if the baby had died and would’ve attracted no attention) reporters started investigating and dug up more stories about practice.

He got a “letter of concern” from the Arizona medical board for stopping an abortion and sending a woman home bleeding after he discovered that her baby was late-term and not 10 weeks as he had thought. He’d also been cited for signing blank, undated prescription forms. He killed one woman by tearing a 3 inch rip in her uterus. This happened in 1995.

A nurse at his clinic also maintained that John Biskind aborted a baby at 26 weeks  after fudging an ultrasound. State law of Arizona requires that paperwork be filled out before such late abortions, as a woman must be determined to “have a risk to her life or health.” He also failed to have another doctor on standby in case the baby survived the abortion and to write out of a fetal death certificate.

24 week-old unborn baby

The baby’s mother, Louann Herron, fared no better than her dead unborn child. She continued bleeding after the abortion, and by the time clinic workers called 911, she was past saving.

This would be the second death attributed to this doctor.

“Men Behaving Really Badly” Life Insight volume 9 no. 8 October  1998

Share on Facebook

Clinic Describes Removing “Tissue” from the Uterus

One woman talks about the counseling she received at an abortion clinic:

“The day of the abortion, my future husband was a real sport and drove me to the clinic and paid for the procedure. That is what it became known as that day. He left and said he would pick me up later. I stared around the waiting room and saw a lot of young girls, some alone, some with a boyfriend, a husband, a friend, not many with a mother, all of them looking scared. A young woman called me and made me take another urine pregnancy test. She showed me into a “counseling” room. She came back and told me that I was pregnant, took out a plastic model of a uterus and explained how they would remove the tissue lining of the uterus. There was never any mention of a baby, or fetus, just the tissue that lined the uterus and how it would be removed.”

 

A bill was proposed in Virginia that would’ve mandated the following:

“The bill would require the abortion clinic or hospital to provide a woman with information on the probable age of her fetus and details of the abortion procedure and to offer her information about the pregnancy and other options available. Unless her life is at stake, the woman would then have to wait 24 hours before having the abortion. The information could be given by phone or in person. “

Planned Parenthood oppose this law and lobbied against it, spending a great deal of money to defeat it. According to one pro-choice politician:

“I just think it is patronizing and unfair to women and women’s health.”

Stephen Dinan “24-Hour Abortion Wait Progresses in House” The Washington Times: February 3, 2001: 8

Share on Facebook

Clinic Escort Horrified by the Truth

One women tells her story:

“I became active in the pro-choice movement (first as a legislative worker, then as a clinic escort). I suppose in retrospect I was trying to justify what I had done. Then in 1991 I became pregnant with my son. I went for prenatal visits and was horrified to see a real baby on the Ultrasound screen, and also to hear his heartbeat on the Doptone device! I had not realized the heartbeat started so soon; they never told me anything about that at Planned Parenthood, when my parents brought me for the abortion.”

8 week ultrasound

The heart starts beating around 21 days.

Share on Facebook

Woman Deceived by Counselors

Lynda (USA)

June 26, 2000

…My boyfriend came in, and was ecstatic that I had gone through with it. As we drove away, I felt like I had forgotten something, or left something behind. We returned home, and his promise to me to be there with me, was totally false. He left me there alone. At first, I was relieved that it was over, and then I was hit by the most overwhelming, tremendous grief I had ever experienced. I was also experiencing very bad cramps. Four days after the abortion:
I got up to go potty, and felt that something was not right inside. When I wiped, I glanced down at the wad of toilet paper in my hand, and saw, my 12-week old fetus. It’s head was smashed, and it’s eyes were on either side of it’s head. It’s body was attached to the head, and only the right arm and hand remained. I was shocked and horrified by what I saw.

My boyfriend saw it to. He was standing in the bathroom shaving, while I went potty. He heard me say “oh my gosh”, when he turned to see what I was holding. He ran out of the bathroom, and kept repeating, “I didn’t see it, I didn’t see that, I didn’t see the dead baby.” I just sat there, with tears streaming down my cheeks, as I held my baby’s hand on my pinky, trying to find words to say, of why I failed this innocent child. I had tuned my boyfriend out, to where he was just some noise in the background. I later phoned the Dr.’s office that performed the abortion, asking them to clarify what I had seen. They criticized me, because, “a baby does not form until the last trimester”. They deceived me when they initially told me that. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out what a miniature hand, with four fingers and a thumb looked like, or to know what it was I held in my hand that day. I sunk into a deep depression for two years, attended post abortion counseling through new hope church, where I was mostly made to feel guilty for “murdering my baby,” and “disappointing god.” At night, I’d lay awake in bed, sobbing quietly, so not to wake my boyfriend, who had turned from demanding, to insensitive and unsupportive, and couldn’t deal with me, given I simply just couldn’t “get over it”. My relationship with him ended. My experience did not benefit my life, only damaged me. If I had been fully aprised to the full impact, risks, etc., my position would have been different, homeless or not. I believe the abortion doctors deceive a person….

From AbortionConcern.org

Share on Facebook

Not a Blob of Tissue

The following “letter to the editor” has appeared in many newspapers around the country and was read by Senator Gordon Humphrey on the floor of the U.S. Senate. It appeared in the Congressional Record on pg. S.10651.

To the Editor:

I have read letters to the editor from persons who feel abortion is morally wrong and others who feel abortion is a matter of choice. I would like to present a side of the abortion debate that few people consider. That is the position of one who has had an abortion. This is what the “right to choose” has meant to me: In 1980 I aborted my first child. I was told at Planned Parenthood that this little “blob of tissue” would be as easily removed as a wart. Terminating a pregnancy, I was told, was no more significant than removing a tiny blood clot in my uterus. “Sounds harmless,” I reasoned. Exercising the right to choose, I opted for abortion. At that time no other options, such as adoption or single parenting, were explained. At the abortion clinic, I was not administered pain killers. When the suction aspirator was turned on I felt like my entire insides were being torn from me. Three-quarters of the way through the procedure I looked down and to my right and there I saw the bits and pieces of my baby floating in a pool of blood. After I screamed “I killed my baby,” the counselor in attendance told me to shut up. Suddenly I felt very sad and alone. But the worst was yet to come. I was not forewarned about the deep psychological problems I would encounter in the months and years to follow. I was never told that I would have nightmares about babies crying in the night. Neither was it explained previous to the abortion that I would experience severe depressions in which I would contemplate suicide. I didn’t mourn the loss of my appendix, so why would I grieve the passing of an enigmatic uterine blob? The answer was that it wasn’t a mere “blob of tissue”. It was a living baby. I realized it the moment I saw his dismembered limbs. I realized too late on abortion. By now the reader may be asking him/herself, “Isn’t this an extreme example of an abortion experience?” Actually, no. Mine was a routine suction abortion. Millions have been done. Why do women who’ve had an abortion have a higher incidence of suicide than other women? And why do the chances of losing a subsequent wanted baby double or even quadruple following a “safe, legal abortion”? Since when has death become good for us?

by Karen Sullivan Ables

sonogram of baby in the first trimester, the time when a suction abortion would be done
Share on Facebook

Men Do Grieve For Their Lost Children

In a book on grief, which researched men and women’s reaction to abortion,  the author makes the following statement:

“Some fathers will feel angry and cheated by the woman’s decision… Many men involved in the termination of the pregnancy they have fathered will experience grief too and may need recognition of their mourning for the loss child.”

Raphael B. The Anatomy of Bereavement (New York: Basic Books, 1983) 240

Read testimonies from postabortion men and get more info on this issue.

Share on Facebook