Dr. Warren Hern: The Mafia Has More Decency Than Pro-Lifers

Dr. Warren Hern, late term abortionist, said the following of pro-lifers:

“The Mafia has more decency and ethics than these people. … The only difference between this and the slaughter of the Jews in Venice is a thousand years. The only difference between this and the Islamic jihad is 8,000 miles. This isn’t about abortion. This is about people who think that they can tell everyone else how to think and what to believe. Once they’ve outlawed abortion and locked up abortion doctors, who will they go after next? People who write for newspapers? People who read books? Blacks? Jews? They hate freedom. They hate secular thought.”

Excerpts from quotes by third-trimester abortionist Warren Hern of Boulder, Colorado, quoted by Steve Jackson. “The Fight of Their Lives.” Westword [Denver, Colorado], February 13-17, 1997, pages 17 to 31

In reality, all the pro-lifers hit his abortion. Dr. Warren Hern performs abortions like the one below every single day of his career.

20 week aborted baby

 

Share on Facebook

Catholics for Free Choice President Claims Pro-Lifers Hurt Women

“Protesting or praying outside women’s health centers by cardinals and other church leaders, no matter how non-violent it appears, offends and hurts women.”

Frances Kissling, President of Catholics for a Free Choice (CFFC), quoted in Cathleen Falsani. “Abortion Foes Gather to Pray: Cardinal Bernardin Leads Mass at Chicago Clinic.” Daily Southtown, June 27, 1999, pages 1 and 10

Frances Kissling says that even peaceful pro-life activism hurts women. She ignores the many pro-life people who devote their entire life’s work to helping women deal with their crisis pregnancies. A network of hundreds of crisis pregnancy centers throughout the country help women with practical support and counseling as well as material items and services they need to carry their pregnancies to term. Those who intervene at abortion clinics and do so peacefully have been responsible for steering potential abortion patients away from the abortionist’s curette. Many of these mothers are later very grateful that someone was there to reach out to them in front of the clinic.

Share on Facebook

Washington Post Columnist Demonizes Pro-Lifers

“With powerful backing from the Catholic Church and Christian evangelicals, abortion opponents dress themselves up in the moral garb of saints and lambaste the other side as murderers, creating a poisonous atmosphere in which terrorism against abortion providers is not only tolerated but in some circles esteemed as some sort of holy act.”

Washington Post columnist Judy Mann, in the October 28, 1998 issue of the paper. Described in Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights. 1998 Report on Anti-Catholicism

One way that pro-choice individuals try to “shut up” pro-lifers is to accuse them of supporting violence. Even though violence is very rare in the pro-life movement and those who have engaged in violent behavior have been roundly condemned by every pro-life group in the country, some pro-choice activists blame pro-lifers for every act of vandalism or violence that is perpetuated by lone fanatics. If all animal rights activists were condemned because of the terrorist actions of a few, if civil rights activists were told to go away because of the actions of the Black Panthers, if Vietnam War pacifists were told that they were all to blame for they handful of bombings perpetuated by extremists in their movement, perhaps it would make sense for the pro-life movement to be as demonized as it is.

And let’s not forget the real violence here:

Share on Facebook

Kate Michelman On Pro-Lifers

“There’s a qualitative difference in the nature of their [pro-life] involvement … It’s a life and death issue for them, and that creates a zealousness about it, about their work, that I don’t think is matched quite on our side. The strength of the [pro-abortion] movement really resides in the mainstream view that government has no role in this decision.”

Kate Michelman, President of the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARRAL), quoted in Brigid Schulte of the Knight-Ridder News Service. “Abortion Foes Mix Passion, Technology.” The Oregonian, February 19, 1995, page A14.

Having been in the pro-life movement for years, I agree with Kate Michelman. The passion that pro-lifers show for the abortion issue is greater than that that most pro-choice or show – we pro-lifers know the were fighting for the lives of unborn babies – that makes us realize how incredibly important it is to stand for life.

Share on Facebook

Abortionist Harry Morgentaler On Pro-Lifers

“Who are the opponents of the right of women to control their reproductive capacity, to become equal to men, to acquire safety, dignity and self-respect? The answer lies in fundamentalist religion. …  It is not surprising that most of the opposition to women’s rights comes from fundamentalist religious groups, be they Catholic, Protestant, Jewish or Muslim. … These anti-women philosophies are akin to the fascist, dogmatic movements that resulted in the Holocaust and the Second World War, which claimed millions of innocent victims.”

Canadian abortionist Henry Morgentaler, quoted in “Fascist Fundamentalism.” The Human Quest, September-October 1992, page 23.

Morgentaler is a late term abortionist. Here is a picture of a late term abortion. Morgentaler has his own victims.

Share on Facebook

Ms. Magazine on Pro-Lifers

“The forces that seek reversal of Roe v. Wade are the obvious product of religious zealotry and misogyny [hatred of women]. There is behind the sanctification of the fetus a scarifying agenda that seeks to deny women our personhood, sexuality, and power over procreation; to divert the all-too-slow march of women of all colors toward self-determination and equality; and to reestablish state power to dictate who is an eligible reproducer and sexual partner. … “

Ms. Magazine “Special Report,” April 1989, page 92.

Share on Facebook

Pro-Life Accounts of a Pro-Choice March

The March for Women’s Lives is a yearly (usually) pro-choice demonstration held in Washington D.C. Here are some accounts of the 2006 March from pro-life counter-protestors and observers.

One pro-choicer, whose photo-essay can be found in the INDC Journal, did not skimp on his criticism of pro-lifers.

However, he was forced to admit:

“The speeches contained the typical hyperbolic rhetoric, marshalling this crowd of hundreds of thousands….One harangue in particular caught my attention, delivered by a fiery, square-built woman with close-cropped blonde hair. It was a screaming, apoplectic treatise on the virtues of “cunt power,” that demanded that the nation bow to the authority of the “cunt” and pledge allegiance to the the United “Cunts” of America. “My Cunt ‘Tis of Thee,” etc., etc….At this point, I became a bit disturbed, for the crowd wasn’t awkwardly tolerating this obscene and immature rant, rather raising their arms and screaming throaty acceptance of a woman performing second rate porno-schlock, ostensibly as a legitimate representative of one side of a highly divisive and important public issue. I consider myself pro-choice, but this wasn’t my crowd, and these orators didn’t speak for me.”(2)

He then goes on to discuss how the crowd reacted to a line of Episcopal priests standing with the pro-life counter-demonstrators. The priests were standing quietly.

“For the most part, the priests prayed or calmly attempted to speak to protesters that drew near enough to engage them. I had little idea how badly many in the crowd would react to the mere sight of the religious garb. Mere seconds passed before I witnessed the first bout of rage. Thousands upon thousands of people walked by, and I would say that perhaps a fifth of the individuals within sight and shouting distance had a highly aggressive reaction to the presence the priests. They yelled, spit and uttered shocking profanities. A smattering of the worst:

“F-ck you!”

“Die, you f–king murderers!”

“Why don’t you go screw some kids!”

“How many little boys did you f-ck in the ass today?”

“You just want more wayward children around so you can f-ck them!”

“Shouldn’t you be off molesting altar boys?”

“You want to kill women? F-ck you!”

It was simply stunning. The second these people…saw the priests, they simply lost their minds. It was like watching a live-action scene from the Exorcist repeated ad infinitum. No exaggeration, no joke.

This was a fine example of hateful mob mentality. The belligerents that screamed the most vile profanities were egged on by the people that they were with, which made for a nice collusion of nasty emotions: violent anger and malicious, hysterical laughter…”(3)

The post showed a number of pictures of pro-choicers hurling abuse at the priests.

At one point a red liquid was thrown, splattering both the priests and a nearby cop.(4)

Accounts from pro-lifers who were there are similar.

Pro-Lifer John Lomperis says this of the speakers:

“They … resorted to name-calling, denouncing pro-life people as ‘cowards’, ‘peckerwood anti-choice fanatics’ and people ‘who have no shame’ among many other epithets.”(5)

He also makes mention of the reaction of the pro-choice crowd to the pro-life presence at the March.

“During the course of the march, hundreds of peaceful pro-life counter-protesters endured a steady stream of hurled curses, hateful shouts, and even an occasional projectile (including black ink, spit, Planned Parenthood condoms with crude jokes on them, an egg, and a flier picturing Jesus and reading: “Save Lives / Abort Christ” The main pro-life groups represented were American Collegians for Life; Silent No More (a Christian ministry of and for post-abortive women); Feminists for Life; an African-American evangelical group called the Life, Education and Resource Network (LEARN), and Operation Witness. The pro-choice marchers reserved some of their most energetic shouts and confrontations for the Silent No More women quietly holding signs that said, simply, “I Regret My Abortion.”(6)

Karen A. Torres was at the March with her two daughters, attending with the counter-demonstrations. She witnessed a priest mobbed by pro-choice demonstrators.

Torres said the crowd in the street “went crazy” at the sight of a crucifix and roman collar, coupled with the recitation of the rosary. “It was too much for them,” she said. “Women naked from the waist up (except for NARAL stickers) came as close as possible to the priest to scream obscenities and block sight of the crucifix with their signs promoting sex-ed….One enraged man began banging his sign hard against an oversized poster of a baby in the womb, attempting to topple it and possibly its holder.

One man who appeared to be quite serious told us repeatedly that he worshipped Satan and was putting a curse on us. Over and over again we were told that Jesus hated us, God was pro-choice and we were bad Christians who were going to hell.

But the most hated and attacked target was the priest. For major portions of the march, we could not hear the rosary over the microphone, even though we were only five feet away. At the sight of the priest and his crucifix, people cursed, taunted and chanted slogans, but mostly they just screamed and shrieked incoherently. Between the decibel level and the hate, that sustained screaming was unnervingly like a tidal wave coming at you.”

Torres said that the priest never lost his temper. She said he exhibited “patient compassion” in the face of “unremitting hate.”

“In my 47 years I have never witnessed a better example of grace under pressure (better known as courage) and I would like to write and tell him so.”(7)

A pro-life demonstrator named Dr. Messe gave the following account of the March:

“To get into our position on 7th St, we had to cross through the Mall, right through the pro-abortion crowd. I was naive coming down to Washington, I did not think they would have that many. But they did have a large crowd. Our group of one hundred or so walked silently, single file. The barrage of insults and screaming in our faces was hard to take….

A group of one hundred young pro-abortion supporters decided to leave the rally on the Mall and march in front of us and scream…They played drums and chanted in our face. They were heavily tattooed and dressed in scanty black clothing. They rubbed their genitals and made pelvic gestures upon each other. ‘Masturbation, Procreation’, they shouted over and over again. The police held them back and after twenty minutes finally made them continue down the street.

When the marchers came by, we were assailed by the usual comments, to which our group did not respond. They said:

If men could get an abortion, it would be a sacrament!

Shove that crucifix up your A__!

Jesus was Pro-choice!

How many babies have you adopted?

F – – – You – while they pointed the middle finger at the crucifix.”(8)

Many of the pro-life counter-demonstrators had no connection with organized religion. However, they fared no better. A group of women held up “I Regret My Abortion” signs. One discusses her experience:

“The March, in three words: “viciously, mercilessly abusive.” The amount of verbal aggression and abuse hurled at me personally, by women and men, of all ages, for carrying the I REGRET MY ABORTION sign, well, I thought that I was ready for it.

I wasn’t. Not even close.

I consider myself fairly far along on the “healing” and “public-appearances” scales. We stood, all 500 of us in the Silent No More Awareness groups, in total silence as planned, for over five hours, not replying or saying one word to anything that was said or done to us, and I do mean anything.

But nothing prepared me for literally mobs of livid people screaming the most hateful vicious snide things at me personally. We were spit on, and had an egg hurled at us from the marchers. There were two groups of Satanists. And the signs. Like the guy who held a handmade sign, “BABY KILLER” with an arrow pointed downward at himself. If not for the riot police, we would have been mobbed. There was that much viciousness. People broke through the riot police’s invisible line just to come up in my face and hurl insulting words. There were not enough police to form a complete line, so they would run up to me, shout out their abuse, and run back before the policeman or woman got to stop him/her. And I said nothing to anyone, just held my sign.”(9)

She goes on to tell more about the counter-protest.

“The riot police, perhaps fifty in our area, in full battle gear, lined up on the march-side of the barricades, facing us, about 10-15 feet apart. Before the march, I said to the few of them standing right in front of me, “Thank you for being here. I know it’s your job so you have to be here, but thank you anyway. You won’t be getting any trouble from us.” One of the policemen nodded his head respectfully at me in silent acknowledgment and thanks….

I saw men look me right in the eye after reading the sign as they shouted out the chants that are the 30-year-old standards of the pro-abortion movement, like “Pro-Life? That’s a lie! YOU don’t care if women die” …Little did they know, how much we do care and do help women to survive and have a better alternative to abortion.

Later, after reading my sign, one woman started a chant that about a hundred marchers began screaming at me, “THAT WAS YOUR *CHOICE*!” essentially telling me I had no right to be upset or to regret. They stopped marching and stood right in front of me, all one-hundred of them glaring directly at me, some not more than 2-3 feet away, jabbing fingers at me in the air, their faces twisted and contorted with contempt. I just looked from face to face, amazed at what I was seeing. It was starting to get frightening. Not for my personal safety, but their hatred was feeling as though it was reaching a fever pitch and becoming toxic.

Can any of you pro-choicers stop for just a moment, and imagine nothing but a flimsy piece of fence standing between you and 100 frenzied people, not safely away on some wired blog, but there live and in person, who are screaming their disgust and hatred for you?…

I said [to the other pro-lifers] “It always turns out that the ones who are the most upset at us, the angriest ones, the ones who are so hateful, have so much to cover up, and this is how they do it. They are the post-abortive ones, even if they don’t say so. And they’re the ones who hit the wall the hardest when they do. I know, because I denied it for over 20 years…I know what happens when it all comes out.”

Overwhelmed by emotion, she began to cry:

“You know how it all rushes through you at once when you start weeping? Everything comes out. I cried because, here were these thousands of people fighting for a right I wish they’d never allowed me to have, instead of fighting for the daughters and sons I and millions of others will never have. I felt they were fighting for the death of my daughter, to deny me the right to grieve her…

Then I realized I wasn’t crying so much for me as I was for them. I felt they were fighting to hide their loss because to come to grips with it, after being so fervently pro-choice, would bring upon them the same kind of abuse I was getting. I felt so crushingly sad for them. The cold, angry hearts, the screaming remorselessness, the relentless cruelty they seemed capable of, toward me and toward another living human being, their own flesh and blood. I realized that they don’t see those living human beings as the gift they are, because if they did, the facade could no longer justify their ‘choice.’ Just as it one day stopped hiding the truth of my choice. I just wanted to reach out and hold them all…”

The pro-life counter-protesters seemed to feel that if they had only reached one person, it was worth it. Perhaps despite the anger evident in the pro-choicers, some seeds were planted that day.

Here are some photos of the event.

Footnotes

1. Jo Freeman http://www.jofreeman.com/photos/MFWL.html#photos
2. “Bill” INDC Protests March for Women’s Lives Part 2. May3, 2004. http://www.indcjournal.com/archives/000361.php
3. Ibid.
4. Ibid.
5. John Lomperis “Oldline Churches Participate in Abortion March” May 20, 2004.
6. Ibid.
7. Michael F. Flach. “Editor’s Deck: Descent into Hell” Catholic Herald 5/13/04
8. Blog “After Abortion” http://afterabortion.blogspot.com/2004_04_25_afterabortion_archive.html#108304137944458162
9. Ibid.
10.Ibid.

Share on Facebook

International AIDS Society Study On Abortion Clinics

In an International Aids Society study titled: “HIV-related discrimination in abortion clinics, New York City, USA: 1988-1992,” that was released at the International Conference AIDS 1993 Jun 6-11.

Calls were placed to all the abortion clinics in New York, the caller told the clinic she had HIV/AIDS. The report revealed that:

In 1988:

— 42% of the abortion clinics refused to provide services when they discovered that the client was HIV positive.

In 1990:

— 31% of the providers either refused an appointment or increased the fee for an abortion on learning that the caller was HIV positive.

Share on Facebook

Associated Press Article On AIDS an Abortion

The Associated Press Reported in the article, “Abortionists Shun AIDS-Infected Women, Survey Finds” March 21 1990:

In a survey, conducted in November 1988 through February 1989, callers from the New York City human rights commission made appointments with 30 abortion clinics and physicians that advertised in the Yellow Pages.

• Twenty abortion clinics canceled the appointment after the caller said she was infected with HIV but had no symptoms of AIDS. Twelve of the 20 said they did not have adequate infection control.

• Others said abortion on an HIV-infected woman was too complicated a procedure for them to handle and referred the caller to a hospital.

Many of the responses “were very hostile,” said a committee lawyer. “Some just hung up or said, We can’t treat your kind.”

Abortionist Lewis Koplik was asked to respond to the story and told reporters that he has an “undocumented gut feeling” that the discrimination might be happening elsewhere. “If you have one woman who has HIV infection or AIDS and can’t get service, that’s a real problem. It’s just something that should not happen,” he said.

Los Angeles obstetrician-gynecologist David Grimes, chairman of Planned Parenthood’s medical advisory committee, told the reporters that he does not believe the problem is widespread, although it may be more apparent on the East Coast where more women are infected with HIV.

Share on Facebook

Abortion Clinics Reject AIDS Patients

The National Academy Of Sciences, HIV Screening of Pregnant Women and Newborns (1991) Reported:

HIV-infected pregnant women who elect to terminate their pregnancies may discover that their access to abortion services is restricted. Some areas report outright exclusion of HIV-infected women by abortion clinics. In an attempt to document the degree to which HIV-infected women were discriminated against in gaining access to abortions revealed that two-thirds of the abortion facilities contacted in the study:

• Canceled appointments made by allegedly HIV-infected women once their infection status was disclosed.

• Some of the facilities attempted a plausible response, such as their inability to handle that type of procedure.

Others:

• Changed the vacation schedules of the physicians or quoted inflated prices for abortion services to discourage those seeking care.

• Openly reported that their staff refused to care for HIV-infected patients.

This information was compiled by Life Dynamics at their website www.deathroe.com

Share on Facebook