Images of aborted babies from pathology department

A woman whose job includes examining aborted babies has taken pictures of some of the babies killed in the hospital where she works.

Gahra Jenkins (a pseudonym) is a Pathologist Assistant at a hospital (the name and location of which I am withholding to protect her identity) where she helps the pathologist examine tissue. She has worked at the hospital since May 2014.

In Jenkin’s own words:

I’m a “Pathologist Assistant” (which requires a master’s degree from a NAACLS accredited program in Pathology). I assist the Pathologist in both surgical pathology and autopsy pathology. My main duties are performed within the Gross Pathology laboratory (sometimes grouped in with the Histology department) and there we receive specimens from the OR, sometime ER, and from out-patient services. I take these specimens, examine and describe them grossly/MACROscopically and submit the most pathologically diagnostic portion of that specimen for the Pathologist to look at MICROscopically in order to make a diagnosis.

Some of the ‘specimens’ Jenkins examines are the bodies of aborted babies.

Although the vast majority of abortions take place in outpatient facilities set up for that purpose, 4% of all abortions are performed in hospitals that offer a range of services. Jenkins’ hospital is one of these. On average, she is called upon to examine three aborted babies every other week. While this is a small number compared to how many can be done in a busy abortion facility, each of these children is a unique individual whose life has been destroyed through terrible violence. Jenkins estimates that she has examined babies as far along as 12 weeks.

Below are some pictures Jenkins took of the victims of abortion at her hospital. All these abortions were done by the suction abortion method.   (See diagram following pictures.)

01dbc924-1a26-4f09-8dfa-ffb4fc8d7f20

11701339-7111-40e5-ad68-2062f0b40ac1

a519ac0d-a0a1-40c0-a1ac-209b99ff745d

 

f3caf0da-1473-4b9f-b282-8e5218b712af

unnamed

Jenkins says:

Parts are most recognizable between the 8th and 12th week mark. Since the preferred termination procedure is D&C with suction, the best way I can describe what I see are dismembered hands, arms, legs with feet, sometimes a rib cage, hip bone etc. I also tell people that it looks like someone put a baby into a blender.

In a suction D&C, or suction abortion, the cervix (opening to the woman’s womb which closes to protects the baby) is stretched open by metal rods and a suction cannula attached to a tube is inserted into the women’s uterus. Attached to the other end of the tube is a suction machine, which generates force that pulls apart the preborn baby and sucks the pieces through the tubing into a small glass jar. These are the parts that are sent to the pathologist to be examined.

The diagram below shows the procedure:

suctionabortion14weekbabyinwomb

On their website, the nation’s biggest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood, describes a suction abortion this way: 

Either a hand-held suction device or a suction machine gently empties your uterus. Sometimes, an instrument called a curette is used to remove any remaining tissue that lines the uterus. It may also be used to check that the uterus is empty.

As you can see above, this ‘gentle emptying’ is not so gentle on the baby.

Share on Facebook

Undercover pro-choicer is surprised by what she finds at crisis pregnancy center

Pro-abortion feminist Sarah Mirk went undercover to a pro-life crisis pregnancy center that helps pregnant women. Mirk says:

“The consultation went differently than I thought it would. The counselor wasn’t a Bible beating hell raiser. She didn’t snipe or snarl as she asked me a list of questions about my religious preference and relationship status. Instead, she seemed like a regular woman, a compassionate just past middle-aged woman from a different background than me, dressed a little conservatively.

Maybe, if I’d been born 40 years earlier, to different parents, in a different state, I would’ve wound up in her chair trying to be honest and conservative, rather than critical and liberal.

I told her I didn’t think I was ready to bear my imaginary child, and she nodded kindly.

“This is a major decision,” she said. “The choice is permanent.”

I wasn’t expecting such a balanced response from an organization whose stated mission is “making a life-changing difference in the lives of our unborn.”

At the end of our 10 minute conversation, the counselor wished me well and handed me a fat stack of pamphlets …. Sorting through the glossy flyers and booklets was horrifying. They were antiabortion propaganda… chock full of gory fetus pictures, anguished stories about women who got abortions, and praising, heroic tales of women who decided to keep their children.”

Sarah Mirk “Lucky Breaks and Little Miracles” in Kim Wyatt, Sari Botton Get Out Of My Crotch: 21 Writers Respond to America’s War on Women’s Rights and Reproductive Health (South Lake Tahoe, California: Cherry Bomb Books, 2012) Kindle edition

If the “gory” fetus pictures (like these) and stories (like these) are true, is it really “horrifying” to share them? Shouldn’t women be able to learn the truth before they submit to surgery? Does she really think she will get a thorough and unbiased material from abortion clinics? If you think so, go here. 

Share on Facebook

Abortion providers don’t have to tell risks, says former clinic owner

“Abortion is the only surgery for which the surgeon is not obligated to inform the patient of the possible risks of the procedure, or even the exact nature of the procedure. Indeed, abortion providers are the only medical personnel who have a “constitutional right” to withhold information, even when directly questioned by the patient.”

Former owner of two abortion clinics and director of 3, Carol Everett, in personal conversation with author Randy Alcorn

Share on Facebook

Abortionist describes first trimester abortion

Dr. Warren Hern, abortionist, describes how to do a first trimester suction abortion in his book Abortion Practice:

“The principal motion of the suction handle while in the uterus is rotation. The physician will usually first notice a quantity of amniotic fluid followed by placenta and fetal parts which may be more or less identifiable. As this is happening the patient is advised that she will hear a loud sucking sound. Vital signs should be observed regularly, and a Doppler inaudible to the patient should be used at intervals to determine the presence or absence of fetal heart tones.”

Warren M. Hern. Abortion Practice (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company, 1990)

First trimester unborn baby. Suction abortions are done at this time.

10 wks

Fetal parts at 10 weeks after a suction abortion

10w02_medium

Share on Facebook

Abortion doctor: “Environment for abortions is ‘ominous’

A pro-choice feminist says cites an article:

“Robert Livingston, a retired doctor who used to perform illegal abortions in the 1960s, recently told a New Jersey newspaper that he “would be afraid” to work today.

“The atmosphere is so ominous now,” he said.

It is an atmosphere fueled by a strategic, steady stream of misinformation.”

“Retired Abortion Doctor says Stigma Is Greater Now Than Pre-Roe Vs. Wade” Think Progress Health, September 9, 2012

Quoted in Tara Murtha “Ripple Effect”

Kim Wyatt, Sari Botton Get Out Of My Crotch: 21 Writers Respond to America’s War on Women’s Rights and Reproductive Health (South Lake Tahoe, California: Cherry Bomb Books, 2012) Kindle edition

Share on Facebook

Planned Parenthood director says abortion activists lie about deaths from illegal abortion

Malcolm Potts, former Medical Director of the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), who helped promote abortion throughout the world, claimed in 1970:

“Those who want the [abortion] law to be liberalized will stress the hazards of illegal abortion and claim that hundreds, or thousands, of women die unnecessarily each year – when the actual number is far lower.”

Malcolm Potts, Peter Diggory and John Peel. (Abortion, Cambridge University Press 1970)

Read about illegal abortion deaths in the US and how pro-choicers distorted the numbers here.

Share on Facebook

Feminist: Abortion kills ‘something’ – or ‘someone’….

From post-abortive pro-choice feminist Sari Botton:

“For years I told myself I’d withheld [talking about her abortion] because it wasn’t anybody’s business, and maybe it wasn’t.

Later I told myself it was because the topic of abortion was unpleasant and difficult, and nobody wants to talk about it. That’s my husband’s take on it too. He was party to an abortion when he was 40, and although he is very happy it got him out of co-parenting with someone he didn’t want in his life any longer, he remains deeply conflicted about having gone through with it. Even to the staunchest of pro-choicers, the reality of abortion, the termination of something – someone? – that had gotten a start, is unfortunate and sad. It’s still so, so crucial to have an option.”

Sari Botton “Confessions of a Good Girl” Kim Wyatt, Sari Botton Get Out Of My Crotch: 21 Writers Respond to America’s War on Women’s Rights and Reproductive Health (South Lake Tahoe, California: Cherry Bomb Books, 2012) Kindle edition

Below: Is this “something” or “someone”?

unbornbaby16w-02 (1)

16 weeks- legal to kill in any US state

Share on Facebook

Pro-choice author: laws describing sonograms make me “question humanity”

From pro-choice author Roxane Gay:

“In the race to see who can punish women the most for daring to make these choices, Texas has outdone itself, going so far as to require women to receive multiple sonograms, to be told about all the services available to encourage them to be pregnant, and most diabolically, to listen to the doctor narrate the sonogram.

This legislation designed to control reproductive freedom is so craven as to make you question humanity. It is repulsive.”

Laws requiring women to get sonograms in fact make abortion safer for women because they are the most accurate way to date pregnancies (determining which abortion instruments can be used safely) and detect tubal/ectopic pregnancies (which can be fatal if not detected and allowed to rupture) before an abortion, and the most accurate way to find retained bits of tissue that can cause an infection after an abortion

And being forced to learn about the unborn baby on a sonogram makes Gay “question humanity”, is “craven”, and “repulsive” but the abortion depicted below is fine? Which is more repulsive- learning facts about fetal development of doing this to a preborn baby?

21 week abortion, legal in most states
is this repulsive?

Doing this to a baby at this age is legal in most states thanks to the efforts of people like Gay. And to be fair, in case I’m accused of only showing rare late term abortions, here is an abortion at 8 weeks, a time when most abortions are performed

08_weeks-10_medium
8 weeks

More from Gay:

“Waiting periods, counseling, ultrasounds, transvaginal ultrasounds, sonogram storytelling: all of these legislative moves are invasive, insulting, and condescending because they are deeply misguided attempts to pressure women into changing their minds, to pressure women into not terminating their pregnancies, as if women are so easily swayed that such petty and cruel stall tactics will work. These politicians do not understand that once a woman has made up her mind about terminating the pregnancy, very little will sway her. It is not a decision taken lightly, and if a woman does the decision lately, that is her right.”

Roxane Gay “The Alienable Rights of Women” in Kim Wyatt, Sari Botton Get Out Of My Crotch: 21 Writers Respond to America’s War on Women’s Rights and Reproductive Health (South Lake Tahoe, California: Cherry Bomb Books, 2012) Kindle edition

Share on Facebook

Late term abortionist: ‘I’m proud of what I do’

Dr. Leroy Carhart, late term abortoinist

“Abortion is not a four-letter word. I’m proud of what I do.”

Sarah Kliff “The Abortion Evangelist” Newsweek August 31, 2009

This is what Dr. Carhart is proud to be doing:

Late term aborted baby
Late term aborted baby

ablate6

Share on Facebook

Woman has abortion, father doesn’t know yet

A reporter at an abortion clinic observes an abortion patient named Keesha going in for counseling:

In her counseling session, Keesha explains that she’s going back to school and it isn’t a good time in her life to have another baby. The man who got her pregnant is out on the streets, and she expects to see him again, but he doesn’t know she’s here today.

“He thinks he got me knocked up and I’ll have his baby,” she says. “But I ain’t worried about what he’ll do when he finds out.”

Linda Feldmann “Abortion: Uneasy Day at the Clinic” The Christian Science Monitor JANUARY 22, 1998

Share on Facebook