“Would you kill a disabled baby?” Professor answers “Yes.”

The following quote is from Peter Singer, who the New York Times called “the world’s most influential living philosopher” in 2000.

JB Schneewind “Don’t Bring Home the Bacon” The New York Times, December 17, 2000

Peter Singer was asked, “Would you kill a disabled baby?”

He replied:

“Yes, if that was in the best interests of the baby and of the family as a whole. Many people find this shocking, yet they support a woman’s right to have an abortion. One point on which I agree with opponents of abortion is that – from the point of view of ethics rather than the law – there is no sharp distinction between the fetus and the newborn baby.”

“Peter Singer: You Ask the Questions” The Independent September 11, 2006

Share on Facebook

Former abortionist describe “little arms, feet, and faces” of aborted babies

Dr. MacArthur Hill, former abortionist:

“I have taken the lives of innocent babies, and I have ripped them from their mothers’ wombs with a powerful suction machine…

There isn’t any way that you can say that there isn’t a human body inside of those containers when you can look and see the little arms, feet, and faces.”

MacArthur Hill, MD “Meet the Abortion Providers” Conference, Pro-Life Action League, February 1989

Share on Facebook

Abortionist remembers wife who aborted without telling her husband

Former Planned Parenthood abortionist Patti Giebink recalls a woman whose abortion she did:

“I could understand the 45-year-old woman with grown kids out of the house finding herself pregnant and blindsided.

“My husband doesn’t know I’m here. I’m pregnant but I can’t raise another child.”

So she had an abortion. Nobody else knew. She was there by herself. She paid for it. Left. And it seemed like the appropriate choice to both of us.”

Patti Giebink, Kimberly Shumate Unexpected Choice: An Abortion Doctor’s Journey to Pro-Life (Carol Stream, Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers, 2021) 59

Share on Facebook

Post-Abortive women tells her story

Renée Smith had an abortion when she was 18. She writes:

“While I soon healed physically from the procedure itself, it has taken many years for me to heal emotionally and spiritually. Not long after having the abortion I became depressed and withdrawn. It became difficult to engage with my daughter or find joy or fun in anything. I also quickly jumped into another relationship within a few months with a man old enough to be my father…

I was looking for a way to drown out the memory of the abortion. Life had little meaning for me; I was trying to dull the pain of what I had done…

Two years later I got pregnant again. This time I gave birth to a baby boy. Financially, I was in no better place than when I became pregnant the prior time. But, having had an abortion before and still dealing with the emotional turmoil that the abortion brought about, I was determined not to abort my baby this time.

I never spoke about the abortion to anyone, not even my two children. Now, over 20 years later, when I hear certain sounds, like that of a vacuum sealer for food, I am immediately transported back to that moment when I ended my baby’s life. Some things don’t ever go away. Sometimes, I’ll think about him/her and what age they’d be, what type of child or young adult they would have been. Whenever I see another child who is the same age as my unborn baby, I think that could be my child. Every year around the time of the abortion, I could feel a sense of sadness overtake me.”

Renée Smith Hope beyond Abortion: A Story of God’s Redeeming Grace (undated)

Share on Facebook

Reviewer describes callous staff, awful smell of Planned Parenthood

From a yelp Review of Planned Parenthood New Haven Center:

“Staff is callous and insensitive. Smells of urine, blood and fecal matter. I will NEVER go back here not even if it were the last place on earth. I highly recommend going elsewhere.”

Found here. 

Share on Facebook

Journalist discusses why journalists don’t like to write about abortion

A journalist writes about possible reasons other journalists didn’t cover the Kermit Gosnell trial:

“Writing about abortion, like writing about the Israel-Palestine conflict, guarantees (a) extreme abuse from readers no matter where you come down; (b) extreme, tedious scrutiny of every word you write; (c) certain knowledge that personal friends and family members will find themselves in strong, emotional disagreement with you; (d) the discouraging impression that no fact or argument presented will change anyone’s mind; (e) the accusation that you are complicit in something even worse than what Hitler did, or else that you hate women and want to control their bodies, or both.

There’s also the feeling that, by raising the subject, you’re bringing out the very worst in some people. The way they behave to one another in comments and characterize people on the other side of the debate over email is unsettling. Perhaps there’s a journalistic analogue of deliberately avoiding abortion at dinner parties, even ones where political debate is valued and encouraged.”

CONOR FRIEDERSDORF “14 Theories for Why Kermit Gosnell’s Case Didn’t Get More Media Attention” The Atlantic APRIL 15, 2013

Share on Facebook

Post-Abortive woman: I suffer every time I see a baby

A woman named Bella writes:

“My boyfriend married me. We are still together. Now he regrets our decision then. I still feel the pain. I suffer every time I see a baby, a pregnant woman. I wonder if it was a she or he. What the baby would look like. And sometimes when we fight, I tell him how much I still hurt and how much of a coward he was. I don’t advise abortion to anybody.”

Martha Jensen Abortion: Information and One’s Own Journey (2020)

Share on Facebook

Woman bravely resists husband and mother-in-laws pressure to abort

A woman named Liz told her story:

“I had been married to my ex-husband for only a few months when I discovered I was pregnant, even though I was on the pill. We hadn’t planned on having any children so soon, if at all… We weren’t well-off financially, and my income was our primary income.

My ex was against me having the baby, so, much so that he enlisted his mother’s “help” to convince me to get an abortion. At one point his mother offered me $1000 to do it, but I couldn’t entertain the idea. Fortunately, my parents backed me up, my mother especially. I knew it would be wrong in God’s eyes and in my own heart to destroy my own child. My pregnancy went well despite my ex-husband’s whining about it until the last eight weeks.

I got extremely ill (preeclampsia) and had to be on bed rest. My son was born 11 days early, healthy and perfect even though I had almost died while in labor, and he had to be delivered through an emergency C-section. I went into seizures later that evening after the birth, and had to be resuscitated three times that night… As my ex was nowhere to be found, my dad had to sign papers claiming responsibility for me. Granting temporary custody of my son if I did not live through the night…

Sometimes the decision for life is a hard one. Even though my ex made life difficult throughout my pregnancy, and he was even worse once my son was born. This is the reason why divorced him. I wouldn’t have traded my son’s life for “pleasing” my ex and his mother. I’m especially grateful to God for the gift of my son and his timing because I have medical problems, due to high blood pressure, arthritis and a known tendency for preeclampsia that make pregnancy difficult or impossible, and the risks increase with age. On medical advice, I chose permanent sterilization and cannot have any more children.

If I hadn’t had my son when I did, I doubt if I would have been able to have any children at all…

A man who despises and would willingly kill his own child is not worthy to be your husband!…

My son is 11 now… Don’t let “well-meaning” so-called friends or relatives try to make you do something you know is wrong.”

Martha Jensen Abortion: Information and One’s Own Journey (2020)

Share on Facebook

Most Americans don’t agree with the pro-choice movement

Author Ziad Munson on a 2016 study:

“… The General Social Survey… shows that in 2016 only 43% of Americans agreed with the statement that “it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she wants it for any reason.”

The majority of Americans thus disagree with the belief of most pro-choice activists. On the other hand, the same survey shows that 74% of Americans agreed that it should be “possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she became pregnant as a result of rape.”

Cites: Tom W Smith, et al. “General Social Surveys, 1972 – 2016” retrieved June 6, 2017

Ziad Munson Abortion Politics (Medford, MA: Polity Press, 2018) 64

The pro-choice movement claims that women should be allowed to have an abortion at any stage in pregnancy for any reason. Clearly, this is a minority view.

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choicers: We shouldn’t save premature babies because they might be disabled

Pro-Choice authors Harold J Morowitz and James S Trefil wrote:

“… We must discuss one further disagreeable fact. In the language of physicians, the term survivability means just that: the ability of the infant to remain alive. It says nothing about what we usually call the quality of life…

Many 750 gram infants who survive turn out to have disabilities like severe cerebral dysfunction and mental retardation, and there seems to be no way of predicting the outcome of intensive care procedures. This fact has led many in the field to question the usefulness of allocating scarce research funds to pursue survivability to earlier ages…

The question that is asked is whether it is justified to expend limited medical resources in heroic efforts to keep extremely premature infants alive when there is such a need for those resources elsewhere.”

Harold J Morowitz and James S Trefil The Facts of Life: Science in the Abortion Controversy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992) 142

Since 1992 there have been many advances, and most premature babies born today do not become disabled. However, it is appalling that pro-choicers would support letting babies die because disabled people don’t deserve to have money spent on them.

 

Share on Facebook