Pro-choice researcher; Study shows that abortion is a “traumatic life event”

Melinda Tankard Reist, who compiled a book full of testimonies from women who regretted their abortions, said:

“… In early 2006, a group of researchers in New Zealand published a paper in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, an international peer-reviewed journal, detailing the findings of an ongoing survey of some 500 women who had been tracked from birth to approximately 25 years of age. The data was drawn from one of the most long-running and valuable longitudinal studies in the world, and the research team had previously published other well-received papers about the findings from their survey.

This study from Australia’s next-door neighbor created an international stir. The researchers had found that the young women in the study who had undergone an abortion were significantly more likely than their peers to experience major depression (nearly double the rate of women who had never been pregnant and 35% higher than those who had carried to term), substance abuse, anxiety disorder, and suicidal behavior.”

The study was:

David M Ferguson, et.al., “Abortion in young women and subsequent mental health,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 47 (1): 16 – 24, 2006.

Professor David M Ferguson, leader of the research team:

“I remain pro-choice. I am not religious. I am an atheist and a rationalist. The findings did surprise me, but the results appear to be very robust because they persist across a series of disorders and a series of ages.

Abortion is a traumatic life event; that is, it involves loss, it involves grief, it involves difficulties. And the trauma may, in fact, predispose people to having mental illness.”

Nick Grimm, “Higher Risk of Mental Health Problems after Abortion Report,” Australian Broadcasting Corporation, January 3, 2006

From

 Melinda Tankard Reist Giving Sorrow Words: Women’s Stories of Grief after Abortion (Springfield, IL: Acorn Books, 2007)  XI-XII

Share on Facebook

Pro-choice groups reject women who were hurt by their abortions

From author Melinda Tankard Reist, who interviewed many postabortion women:

“Women often spoke of being unable to get satisfactory help for their grief from clinics or organizations connected with abortion. Karleen said that when she sought help at a women’s counseling clinic in Sydney she was told it was wrong of her to speak badly of her abortion experience. Kara, from Queensland, told of posting her personal abortion story on an Internet discussion of abortion. She was told to “get lost” – her story wasn’t welcome….If a woman is depressed after an abortion, she is made to feel it’s her own inability to deal with sadness which is the problem. The onus is all on the woman.”

 Melinda Tankard Reist Giving Sorrow Words: Women’s Stories of Grief after Abortion (Springfield, IL: Acorn Books, 2007) 24 – 25

Share on Facebook

Pro-choice therapists call abortion “life-changing”

Although many proabortion leaders still maintain that abortion does not cause emotional harm to women, some pro-choicers have been forced to acknowledge that women sometimes do suffer after their abortions.

Pro-choice therapists Candace DePuy, PhD and Dana Dovitch, PhD, authors of The Healing Choice: Your Guide to Emotional Recovery After an Abortion said:

“The idea for this book arose out of our clinical relationships with female clients whose lives have been touched by abortion. As mental health professionals, we were concerned to find how few had discussed the life-changing decision they had made. When they began to share their stories, nearly all were surprised by the depth of emotion they still felt.”

Quoted in Kerri-Ann Kiniorski “The Aftermath of Abortion” The American Feminist vol. 5 no. 1, Spring 1998 6 – 7

Share on Facebook

Feminists treat book on postabortion suffering with “contempt”

“When an article I wrote about women’s negative experiences of abortion appeared in The Canberra Times in 1997, a family planning figure hastily wrote in to dismiss postabortion trauma. Similar reactions surfaced in a feminist email discussion about my book that lasted several days. The project was treated with contempt by all but two participants. Someone suggested a quick online collection of “stories of women not hurt by abortion” to be compiled. This reaction unnecessarily pits women’s differing stories against each other and, once again, suggests there is only one authentic experiential reality when it comes to abortion.”

Melinda Tankard Reist, quoted in her book Giving Sorrow Words: Women’s Stories of Grief after Abortion (Springfield, IL: Acorn Books, 2007) 20

Share on Facebook

Postabortion women fails to find support

Until very recently, there were very few places that women could go if they suffered grief and guilt after their abortions that were not affiliated with the pro-life movement. There still are not many. Pro-choicers tend to cling to the belief that abortion is beneficial to women even to the point of ostracizing women who regret their abortions. You often hear pro-choicers claim that any woman who has emotional problems after her abortion was mentally ill before her abortion. In this way they blame women for their own problems caused by their abortions.

A woman who shared her abortion pain in a story in The Age in 1992 described trying to get help from a pro-choice organization:

They said the reason (that you are hurting) is that you’ve got stuff in your background that you need to resolve. But I don’t think I’ve got unfinished business.

Jane Cafarella, “The heartache of abortion,” The Age, Aug. 28, 1992, p.14.

This is an old reference, but many pro-abortion groups still hold to this belief.

Share on Facebook

Planned Parenthood botches forced abortion

A Live Action article describes a complaint against Planned Parenthood. Ayanna Byer scheduled an appointment at Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains.She first intended to take an abortion pill but, according to the author:

According to that complaint, when Byer arrived at the Planned Parenthood clinic, it was determined that her pregnancy was too far along to be terminated through the use of a pill, therefore a surgical abortion was recommended. Ms. Byer agreed upon the condition that she would receive IV anesthesia, for which she would be charged extra.  Although the employees could not get the IV started, the doctor came to start the procedure anyway.

The complaint states:

At this time, Plaintiff immediately told the Planned Parenthood Doctor to stop and that she did not want to go through with the abortion procedure because she had not received any anesthetic.  Plaintiff also informed Planned Parenthood Doctor and agents or employees of Planned Parenthood Defendants that she believed this to be a sign she should not go through with the abortion.  The Planned Parenthood Doctor did not stop despite Plaintiff’s request, and assured Plaintiff the I.V. would be administered and the procedure would only take a few minutes.

At this time, the Planned Parenthood Doctor turned on the vacuum machines and told Plaintiff it was too late to stop.

Ms. Byer cried in pain so much that the abortion was finally stopped 7 minutes later.

Planned Parenthood sent her home with a prescription for antibiotics and painkillers. They never followed up on her.

Two days later, she went to the emergency room. She was experiencing pain and bleeding. It turned out that parts of the aborted baby were left inside her, and she had a serious infection. She needed emergency surgery.

Dr. Foley, who preformed Ms. Byer’s emergency surgery, accused Planned Parenthood of abandoning their patent:

It is not acceptable to refer your patients to the emergency department and assume the on-call doctor will take care of any complications and assume all the risk associated with the complications.

No practicing physician can maintain privileges to practice and perform surgery if they do not provide specific coverage for their patients in case of a complication.  It is considered abandonment of your patient.

Heidi Miller MOTHER SUES PLANNED PARENTHOOD OVER FORCED, BOTCHED ABORTION” Live Action News February 20, 2013

Share on Facebook

Woman suffers complications after abortion: baby born alive

Pro-life author George Grant told the following story about a woman named Bethany de Grassi who had a saline abortion and suffered complications. According to her, her baby was born alive.

First she explains why she had the abortion:

“I was living with a guy at the time,” she told me, “and I really thought we were in love. When I got pregnant, I was happy. I thought we’d just settle down, raise a family, and pursue the American dream. But he had other ideas. When I refused to get an abortion he just moved out. Boom. My whole world caved in. I didn’t know what to do. I was scared and confused.”

Grant says:

Bethany waited almost 3 months before she did anything at all. Finally, she went to a Planned Parenthood clinic. “They told me that they didn’t do the procedure I needed there in the clinic, so they referred me to one of their doctors that had a private practice on the side for late-term abortions. They gave me all kinds of literature with charts and tables and footnotes and all, telling me that the technique was perfectly safe.”

Later, when Bethany was filling out the liability release form, she had a change of heart. “The form had a long, long list of possible complications in tiny print and I started to get really nervous. But the nurse came in and sat by me, assuring me that everything was going to be okay. I believed her.”

She shouldn’t have. Clinic personnel are trained to calm their customers. Sometimes with smiles. Sometimes with lies. Anything, just to get the job done.

The baby was born “gasping”:

Bethany’s troubles began with the delivery. “The baby was gasping when it came out,” she recalled. “It was awful. I started screaming. The doctor was cursing. And the nurse didn’t seem to know what to do. It was a nightmare.”

The child expired quickly and the clinic personnel were able, after a few minutes of coaxing and consoling, to calm Bethany down. She went into recovery was released.

Bethany suffered complications:

2 days later, she suffered a series of seizures and lapsed into a coma. At the hospital, her doctors found that she had hypernatremia – salt poisoning. Her parents were notified and along 6 day struggle for her life ensued. Finally, the medical team at the hospital was able to restore Bethany’s electrolyte balance intravenously and she was roused from the coma. “I should’ve paid attention to my conscience,” she now says. “I knew better than to try to come up with some easy fix for my problems. There’s just no such thing.”

George Grant Grand Illusions: the Legacy of Planned Parenthood (Franklin, Tennessee: Adroit Press, 1988, 1992)75 – 76

Share on Facebook

Planned Parenthood abortion leads to injuries, broken relationship

Pro-lifer George Grant tells the following story:

Jared McCormick took his girlfriend, Susie Glanze, to Planned Parenthood for a pregnancy test late last year. “She was really scared, and so was I,” he said. “I told her that we could go ahead and get married. We were planning on it anyway. We’d just have to move things up a little, is all. But she wanted me to finish up with school first. So, there we were. At Planned Parenthood.”

The test was positive and Susie made an appointment for an abortion the next Saturday “I really went berserk,” Jared said. “I was dead set against the abortion. I begged her to marry me and keep our baby. But she wouldn’t listen.”

The doctors performed a D&C. There was profuse bleeding, but since that is quite common with D&C abortions, the clinic personnel didn’t think anything of it.

That was a terrible mistake. An hour later, Susie was still hemorrhaging and had to be rushed to the nearest hospital emergency room. There she was given 2 units of blood and treated for severe lacerations of the cervix and uterus. It would be almost 2 days later before she would be released.

“It’s amazing what can happen between 2 people in just a couple days time,” Jared said. “Susie was so grieved over what she done – over what they’d done – that she couldn’t stand to be with me anymore. Just like that. It was all over between us. I’m convinced that if she’d known how risky the operation was we’d be together today. And our baby would still be alive.”

George Grant Grand Illusions: the Legacy of Planned Parenthood (Franklin, Tennessee: Adroit Press, 1988, 1992) 73

Share on Facebook

Membership in postabortion support group increases exponentially, shows that women suffer after their abortions

Pro-choicers often argue that postabortion syndrome (PAS) is a myth,   and that women are happy and relieved after their abortions. Contradicting this, however, is the extremely high number of women involved in postabortion ministries and outreaches. An author said the following in 1987. Since then, the number of women seeking postabortion help and joining postabortion support groups has increased exponentially:

“Little evidence can be found to support abortion as psychologically therapeutic, whereas much evidence shows it can be harmful. How else does one account for the rapid rise of an organization such as Women Exploited by Abortion (WEBA)? In the first 10 months of its existence, this organization grew from 2 members to 10,000 members who had previously had abortions, but now are strongly pro-life.”

Paul B Fowler Abortion: Toward an Evangelical Consensus (Portland, Oregon: Multnomah Press, 1987) 172

Share on Facebook

Researcher links abortion to breast cancer, says it’s an “avoidable risk”

After extensive research, Dr. Joel Brind, professor of endocrinology at City University of New York, concluded,

“The single most avoidable risk factor for breast cancer is induced abortion.”

Dr. Joel Brind, “Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of the Abortion/Breast Cancer Link”;

Share on Facebook