Doctor: you must be blind not to see abortion’s harm to women

Dr. Thomas W Hilgers says:

“My medical practice is in obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine with a special emphasis on infertility, reproductive disorders, natural family planning and research. Within that context, I see the aftermath of abortion on a regular and routine basis. It is not difficult to see the tears and the regret pour forth with ease when the issue is gently raised and discussed. One has to be blind – and that is one of our problems – not to be able to see these difficulties.”

Thomas W Hilgers, M.D. “Confronting the Contemporary Medical Contradictions: to Nurture or to Destroy the Pre-Born Child” in Michael T Mannion, Ed. Post – Abortion Aftermath (Kansas City, MO: Sheed & Ward, 1994) 59

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choicer: women love our aborted children

An article in the publication of Feminists for Life says:

“Kris Bercov, a Florida therapist who states that abortions are “sacrifices we make for our own selves,” nevertheless admits that abortion hurts women. In her self–published book “The Good Mother,” she proposes a farewell ceremony for the aborted child that includes coming to grief with the pain caused by the abortion and giving the child a name. Says Bercov, “women are good, we love our children – even sometimes the ones we abort.”

“Prochoicer Admits Abortion Hurts Women” The American Feminist Vol 1 No 1, Summer 1994

Share on Facebook

Abortion advertiser acknowledges some clinics aren’t “up to standards”

Ana Rose, founder of Abortion Clinics Online, a site advertising abortion facilitiess, acknowledges that there are abortion clinics that are dangerous and substandard:

” We know that there are some clinics that aren’t up to the standards the pro-choice community would like. How do you think the pro-choice community should deal with this?”

[Rose] responded, “That’s a really tough issue. I would like to see a national entity like the Joint Commission of Accreditation of Hospitals that would oversee the nation’s clinics.”

“Ann Rose — Not Afraid of the “A” Word By, Interview by Anne Bower The Body Politic, Vol. 7, No. 3 – March 1997, Page 15

Share on Facebook

10% of 1.3 million women experience psychological problems with abortion

Pro-life author Maria Gallagher quotes researcher Priscilla Coleman:

A researcher at Bowling Green State University, Priscilla Coleman, told the Toledo Blade that approximately 10 percent of women who undergo abortions experience psychological problems as a result.

Coleman says:

“It’s that 10 percent with a common procedure that just keeps nudging at me. I think that’s a group we really need to look at more closely. Ten percent of 1.3 million women. [the number of women who abort every year] How could we ignore that? If it was any other medical procedure it would get more attention.”

From the author:

Coleman has co-authored a study which compares psychiatric hospitalizations of women who abort versus women who give birth. The data for the study, which was published in Canada’s most well-respected medical journal, came from California’s Medicaid program, MediCal.

The study showed that women who had had abortions were much more likely to be hospitalized for psychiatric illness during the four years after pregnancy

Maria Gallagher “Abortion Advocates Discount Emotional Problems After Abortion” LifeNews.com January 27, 2004

Share on Facebook

Woman “positive about her abortion” suddenly bursts into tears

Author Mary Kenny tells the following story:

Preborn baby at eight weeks. Most abortions happen around this time or later.
Preborn baby at eight weeks. Most abortions happen around this time or later.

 “When Gina Newson was preparing her program for Channel 4, she happened upon a woman who was exceptionally serene about her abortion. The woman was, indeed, almost a model of positive reaction. She had two children and did not want any more. She had very nearly forgotten about the abortion. To oblige Gina Newson, she took out an old diary to check the details. “Took the children to school,” she had noted. “Left the car in the garage. Checked into clinic for TOP” (termination of pregnancy). As she reviewed these banal events in her well organized agenda, all of no consequence, suddenly tears began to fall. And then she cried a lot.

Nobody knows what the consequences of abortion are. Sometimes, that includes the woman whom it most concerns.”

Mary Kenny Abortion: The Whole Story (London: Quartet Books, 1986) 34

Share on Facebook

Georgette Forney, Silent No More Founder, speaks out

The National Silent No More Awareness Campaign was founded by Georgette Forney of National Episcopalians for Life (NOEL).Silent No More is an organization that allows women to tell their stories of abortion regret and sadness. Forney says:

“I had been contemplating the lack of women’s voices…the media portrayed groups like the National Organization for Women and NARAL [National Abortion Rights Action League, Now NARAL Pro-Choice America] as representing women. But I knew they didn’t represent me or the women who were contacting me.”

Georgette Forney was being contacted by many women who regretted their abortions. There are now thousands of women who have told their stories through Silent No More. They have said that they did the wrong thing when they had an abortion. Silent No More helps with their healing and gives them a platform to  speak out.

Lynn Vincent “Victims of their own choiceWorld Magazine April 09, 2005

The Silent No More website is here.

Share on Facebook

Doctors don’t know how abortion will emotionally impact women

From a medical textbook titled Abortion by Malcolm Potts:

“The true emotional consequences of abortion for the individual woman can never be known to her physician.”

Quoted in: Mary Kenny Abortion: The Whole Story (London: Quartet Books, 1986) 10

This textbook claims that no medical professional can predict how a woman will deal with her abortion. If it’s true that the abortionist doesn’t know how an abortion will make a woman feel in the future, should he do it?

Share on Facebook

Glamour magazine: many couples break up after abortion

An article in Glamour magazine addresses men’s feelings about abortion:

“Male feelings also do not end with the procedure itself. A man is usually very concerned about how a woman will feel toward him afterward, and how he will feel toward her. Understandably, a considerable number of couples break up after the abortion. Recalls one young man, “I don’t know what went wrong, I just didn’t feel the same way about her anymore. I guess I felt guilty about it, and I didn’t want to be reminded of that.”

James Lincoln Collier “Abortion: How Men Feel about One of the Biggest Issues in a Woman’s Life” Glamour February 1980, 245

Share on Facebook

David Ferguson does 25 Year Study

Pro-life doctor Marissa Ogle, M.D wrote about an abortion study that pro-abortion people tried to repress,by Dr. David Ferguson:

“A reputable research scientist attempted to publish results of a well-designed study that concluded, to his surprise, that abortion has a negative impact on the psychological well-being of women. This study by Dr. David Ferguson, a New Zealand pro-choice researcher who was attempting to disprove abortion’s psychological effect on women, found that 42% of women who have had abortions had experienced major depression within the prior 4 years – almost double the rate of women who never became pregnant. The study also indicates that women who have had abortions are twice as likely to drink alcohol at dangerous levels and 3 times as likely to be addicted to illegal substances. The study also found that the risk of anxiety disorders was doubled.

Dr. Ferguson’s study was well-designed, spanning the course of 25 years… The study was undertaken with the position of validating the viewpoint that abortion did not increase mental health problems, but to confirm that these problems were preexisting. Much to the surprise of the researching team, the exact opposite was true. When Dr. Ferguson’s results were presented to New Zealand’s abortion supervisory committee, which ensures that abortions in the country are conducted in accordance with legal requirements, Dr. Ferguson was discouraged from publishing the results. Fortunately, despite his political beliefs, Dr. Ferguson felt that this would be “scientific irresponsibility.” Ferguson himself stated that he remains pro-choice and is not a religious person. The findings were surprising to him, however in his opinions were very robust. He went on to say that abortion is a traumatic event, involving loss and grief that may, in fact, predispose women to mental illness.

The doctor found:

“The fact is that abortions are the most common medical procedure that young women face – by the age of 25, one in 7 have had an abortion – and the research into the costs and benefits have been very weak. This is because the debate between the pro-life and the pro-choice has, in a sense, driven the science out. It verges on scandalous that a surgical procedure that is performed on over one in 10 women has been so poorly researched and evaluated, given the debates about the psychological consequences of abortion.”

Quote is from Ruth Hill “Abortion researcher confounded by study” The New Zealand Herald January 5, 2006

The pro-life author says:

Ferguson then went on to experience a great challenge in finding a journal that would publish the study, very unusual for a research team who typically has research published with the first attempt. A subsequent study by Ferguson reiterated his findings.”

Marissa Ogle, M.D. Still Healing:(2016)  13 – 14

The studies are:

David Ferguson, M., L. John Horwood, Elizabeth M Ritter “Abortion in young women and subsequent mental health” Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry 47.9 (2013): 819 – 27

David Ferguson, LJ Horwood, JM Bowden “Does abortion reduce the mental health risks of unintended pregnancy? A reappraisal of the evidence” Aust N Z Journal of Psychiatry 47.1 (2006): 16 – 24

Read more about abortion’s mental health risks

Share on Facebook

Adverse events reporting is voluntary for pill

Marissa Ogle, M.D, wrote the following about the abortion pill, RU-486 and the adverse events connected to it:

“… There is a voluntary reporting of severe adverse events to the manufacturer. This leaves it up to the provider to decide which events are significant enough to report to the drug company, who in turn determines if it is reportable to the FDA.…

Considering the potential adverse events can be life-threatening or even fatal, the voluntary status of reporting is medically irresponsible. A 2006 analysis of adverse event reports (AER) released by the FDA described 5 deaths, 42 life-threatening hemorrhages, 46 serious or life-threatening infections and 17 undetected ectopic pregnancies… This same group of 607 cases required 513 surgical procedures for follow-up, 235 being emergent in nature with 93% of those performed to control hemorrhage. The AER’s discussed in this study relate to the use of mifepristone in otherwise healthy young women and document a significant risk of severe, life-threatening, or even lethal adverse effects.”

Marissa Ogle, M.D. Still Healing:(2016)  20

Study: MM Gary “Analysis of severe adverse events related to the use of mifepristone as an abortifacient” Annals of Pharmacotherapy 40. 2 (2006): 191 – 97

adverse events happen with this pill
6 week old preborn baby, who could be the victim of an abortion by pill

Read more about the health risks of the abortion pill here

Share on Facebook