Genetic counselors and sex selection abortions

Rayna Rapp interviewed counselors at genetic clinics, where women came to have their babies tested for disabilities including Down syndrome. The counselors then discussed with the women whether or not they would have abortions. Many of the women who came in aborted when they found out that their babies would have a genetic disease or handicap. Some, however, had the tests not to determine whether the baby would be disabled, but to determine whether or not the baby was of the desired sex. According to Rapp:

 “Along the same lines, every counselor deplored abortion of a healthy fetus for reasons of sex selection, but all could tell the stories of the once or twice in their careers when someone had chosen termination because their healthy fetus was the “wrong sex.” And usually, the wrong sex was the female sex. Such fetal “feticide” makes feminist theorists and activists justifiably very angry and pessimistic. Counselors are very troubled by their collusion with such drastic actions, but also express the discipline imposed by their nondirective stance. After all, most reason, a “woman’s right to choose” extends to deciding to abort for whatever cause she finds meaningful, and this one denotes profound problems in her life should she produce an extra daughter instead of a much desired son. Counselors perceive this problem to be particularly burdensome for Chinese and Indian women, who come from groups in which sons are more highly valued. In these communities, there have been public discussions of the uses of sex selection to produce them… Despite their own ethical beliefs, most counselors provide counseling services even when they know that a diagnosis is being sought for sex selection reasons.”

Rayna Rapp Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: the Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America (New York: Routledge, 1999) 94

Note: the baby below with 16 weeks along. At the time this book was written, and ultrasound could only detect the sex of the baby at 18 to 20 weeks. All of these abortions that were done to kill female babies were done late-term.

16 weeks

Share on Facebook

Saving baby girls targeted for abortion leads to “oppression of women”

Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada’s (ARCC) Facebook page, posting an article, on their support of sex selection abortion:

“Lessons from India: Here’s an excellent article that explains in detail how the war against sex selection abortion in India contributes to the further oppression of women in many ways. ….

The right of women to do what they feel is best for them in the circumstances they find themselves is sacrificed at the altar of making empty ‘pro-girl’ gestures. …If you are pro-choice, then you cannot start limiting someone else’s choice because it makes you feel uncomfortable.”

So it is perfectly okay for a woman to have an abortion, often an abortion she is pressured into, solely because her baby is a girl. In fact, preventing baby girls for being aborted because they are girls is “oppression of women.”  This is like bizarro world, where everything is backwards – where preventing sex discrimination is a form of sex discrimination in itself, and killing girls for being girls is somehow pro-woman.

You can read the article that cited this quote here. 

Share on Facebook

Statistics indicate that sex selection abortions happen in Canada and the United States

Concerned about sex selection abortions in Canada, Dr. Rajendra Kale, who the article described as “interim editor-in-chief of the Canadian Medical Association Journal” has proposed that doctors not tell pregnant women the gender of their babies until 30 weeks, when it is too late to abort.

“Kale pointed to research in Canada and the United States indicating that immigrants in certain ethnic groups, including people from China, Korea and India, selectively abort female fetuses: couples who have two daughters are more likely to have a son as their third child than would be excepted if left to chance.”

Don’t Tell Baby’s Sex to Prevent ‘Sex Selection’ Abortions, Doctor Says” Live Science January 16, 2012

Share on Facebook

Sex selection Infanticide versus abortion in India

Gita Aravamudan wrote a book about the gender imbalance in China, India, and a number of other countries, brought about by the infanticide and abortion of girl babies. She describes the coming crisis as more and more men are unable to find partners, and chronicles how population control activists helped fuel the crisis. From her book:

One Indian woman, Lakshmi who had a living 4-year-old daughter and whose 2nd daughter died under mysterious circumstances (suspected infanticide) was 7 months pregnant and considered “high risk”was interviewed by the author. One of the men standing around her said:

“Look at her. If she has one more girl what will she do? Think of all the expenses. Think of all the clothes she will have to buy, the jewelry she will have to make. Think of the coming of age ceremony she will have to perform, the varadatchinai and seer varisai she will have to give. Where do you think the money will come from? One girl is bad enough…”

From Lakshmi herself:

“It is all very well for you town people to speak. You can afford to have yourself tested by machines and kill the girl child even when it is in the womb. In what way is that less of a crime? Is that not also killing? Has any town woman been arrested for that?”

Gita Aravamudan Disappearing Daughters: the Tragedy of Female Foeticide (New Delhi, India: Penguin Books India, 2007) 10-11

Lakshmi has a point. Is it so different to kill a baby right before birth or to kill her right after? Abortions for sex selection are by definition late-term abortions because the sex of the baby cannot be determined until 18 – 20 weeks.

20 weeks . Is killing this baby now morally acceptable while killing her a few months later is morally wrong?
Share on Facebook

Sex Selection service gears advertising towards Asian American Community

The book Bearing Right: How Conservatives Won the Abortion War  describes how NARAL supported a procedure that would allow sex selection to couples doing IVF. They would check the sex of embryos and only implant the ones of the desired sex. The procedure was pioneered for use when a couple had genetic problems, but it was soon used for sex selection.

“NARAL promoted the  postconception technique, known as preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PDG) as a means of eliminating “inherited diseases” and “genetic defects.” It was already approved for screening out embryos of either sex in families that might pass down a serious inherited disease through that sex. Dr. Norbert Gleicher, chair of a chain of fertility clinics, had a number of clients who didn’t carry such a disease but felt they had too many kids of one sex or not enough of the other. They were willing to pay an extra $3,000 or so to get rid of embryos of the others….Gleicehr took the question to his company’s ethics committee, which concluded that it was not only ethical but also imperative to offer PGD for this purpose. So Gleicher put the question to the ASRM ethics committee. In late September, John Robertson, the committee’s acting chairman, sent Gleicher a letter affirming that the clinic “might ethically offer preimplantation genetic diagnosis for the sake of “gender variety” to a family. Gleicher announced that he would begin selling the service immediately….By July 2002 dozens of clinics were selling PGD in the United States…No law restricted the uses to which PGD could be put. Some doctors casually admitted to helping clients eliminate male or female embryos for nonmedical reasons. “What is medical need?” one clinic operator asked the Los Angeles Times, ”Isn’t the right to happiness and health a part of this?”

William Saletan Bearing Right: How Conservatives Won the Abortion War (Berkley: California: University of California Press, 2004)  274-275

A group of feminists sent a letter in protest of the practice

“Nearly concurrent with Robertson’s approval of PDG for sex selection, ads placed by American fertility practitioners offering both pre-and post-conception sex selection have targeted the South Asian community in North America…Those marketing this “service” to South Asians are surely aware that sex selection in India disfavors female children, capitalizing on the strong son preference and overall gender discrimination.”

Nahar Alam et. Al. letter to J Benjamin Younger, MD, 1/15/02

 

Share on Facebook

Planned Parenthood on planning the sex of babies

Dug up this old quote from Planned Parenthood about sex selection abortions.

“… once the state of the fetal diagnostic art moves from second to first trimester, so abortion falls within the menstrual extraction.. Planned Parenthood will increasingly connote planning the sex as well as the spacing of offspring.”

Planned Parenthood spokesman, quoted in Lisa Andrusko “a Fact of Life: What Are Sex Selection Abortions?” March 14, 1985

Read an abortion clinic workers story of sex selection abortions here. 

This abortionist has no problem with sex selection abortions.

Share on Facebook

Most women asking to know sex of baby want boys

According to Dr. Mark Evans, (Wayne Scott University. Detroit) obgyn

“Probably 99% of nonmedical requests for prenatal diagnosis are made by people who want a boy.”

Christopher Farley “The Debate Over Uses of Prenatal Testing” USA Today Feb 2, 1989 1D

He does not go on to say how many women then abort the girls that they do not want.

18 weeks – around the time when a baby’s gender can be determined by an ultrasound

Quoted in Francis J. Beckwith “Politically Correct Death: Answering the Arguments for Abortion Rights” (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 1993)

Share on Facebook

Doctors Willing to Do Ultrasound Screening For Sex Selection Abortion

In a 1985 study, 2/3 of 295 geneticists surveyed would perform prenatal diagnosis (28%) or refer patients to another doctor to do it (34%) even if the parents had said they’d choose to abort if the baby was the “wrong” gender.

Dorothy C. Wertz and John C. Fletcher “Fatal Knowledge? Prenatal Diagnosis and Sex Selection” Hastings Center Report (May/June 1989) p 21-27

Quoted in Francis J. Beckwith “Politically Correct Death: Answering the Arguments for Abortion Rights” (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 1993)

Share on Facebook

Abortionist Has No Problem with Sex Selection Abortions

When asked about his opinion on abortion is done solely because the baby is the wrong gender, Detroit abortionist Michael A. Roth said:

“I have no ethical problems with it, absolutely not. I think abortion should be available on demand.”

20 week-old unborn baby

Gina Kolata “Fetal Sex Test Used as Step to Abortion” the New York Times Dec 25, 1988.

An abortion because of the gender of the baby is always a late-term abortion because the sex cannot be determined until 18 to 20 weeks.

 

Share on Facebook

Doctor Responds to Sex Selection Abortions

Dr. John Fletcher from the National Institutes of Health, reacts to the tendency of couples to ask for an ultrasound to determine whether or not the baby is a boy or girl, with the purpose of aborting if it’s the wrong gender. He disagrees with this reason for abortion but realizes he must support it or else be a hypocrite. He says that ultrasounds must be done in these cases.

“The existence of some trivial reasons should not deter us from the larger goal of protecting the right of women to make such decisions in the first place… It is inconsistent to support an abortion law that protects the absolute right of women to decide and, at the same time, to block access to information about the fetus because one thinks that an abortion may be foolishly sought on the basis of the information.”

John C Fletcher “Ethics of Amniocentesis for Fetal Sex Identification” Sounding Board, New England Journal of Medicine 301, no. 10 (September 6, 1979) 551 from James Tunstead Burtechaell, C.S.C. Rachel Weeping: the Case against Abortion (San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row Publishers, 1982)

Share on Facebook