Pro-Choice author: Women have abortions due to “maternal instinct”

From pro-choice author Miriam Claire:

“There are many reasons for choosing to have an abortion. Perhaps underlying them all is a deeply maternal, instinctive feeling that the time is not right to give birth and that to do so would be detrimental to all concerned…

It is a maternal instinct that prompts women to have an abortion, because they don’t believe that they can provide emotional and physical sustenance for a child (or another child) at that time in their life.”

Miriam Claire The Abortion Dilemma: Personal Views on a Public Issue (Xlibris Corporation, 2013) 15, 31

Below: 8-week old baby. Before and after abortion.

Fetus at 8 weeks

Abortion at 8 weeks

 

Share on Facebook

Abortionist does abortion on Black woman to reduce the Black population

British author Fran Amery wrote about how in England:

“In the 1970s…women frequently reported encounters with unsympathetic and patronizing doctors who would not refer them for abortions.

Yet in 1977, the feminist magazine Spare Rib reported on the case of a black woman who found it easy to access an abortion through her doctor, only to later discover that the same doctor consistently refused abortions and hormonal contraception to white women and was known to want to keep the black population from rising.”

Fran Amery Beyond Pro-Life and Pro-Choice: The Changing Politics of Abortion in Britain (Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2020) 34

Share on Facebook

Woman had abortion because her mixed-race child was “very unlikely to be adopted”

One woman says why she had an abortion:

“At the time I was in a relationship with a man who was black, and the pregnancy was the result of contraceptive failure.

The relationship was over by the time I found out about the pregnancy, I had no way of supporting a child, and I knew that if I went ahead, a mixed-race child was very unlikely to be adopted.

I discovered I was pregnant fairly early on, but I was just under 12 weeks when I had the procedure and I have never regretted it.”

Martha Jensen Abortion: Information and One’s Own Journey (2020)

10 week sonogram of baby

Share on Facebook

Christian gives his reasons for renting to an abortion clinic

Pro-life activist Norman L Geisler writes:

“One day my curiosity was piqued at our clinic when I wondered who owned the building they were renting out to kill unborn babies. I wish I hadn’t asked. Unbelievably, it turned out to be two Roman Catholic businessmen and an evangelical Christian!

I thought I would like to speak to the evangelical. When we met for breakfast, I asked if he knew what was transpiring in his building.

He did, but immediately passed the responsibility onto his wife with whom he inquired before he entered the contract to rent the building to abortionists. She rationalized to him, “Well I would like to think there was a place our daughter could go, if she got into trouble!”

When I pointed out that he was profiting from renting a building in which they were regularly killing little unborn human beings, he justified his actions, saying, “If I dropped out of the contract, I would lose thousands of dollars.”

Norman L Geisler “Foreward” in David Ross Choosing for Two: An Examination of Abortion Decision-Making and Its Implications for Crisis Counseling (Portland, Oregon MW Media, 2017) vi

Share on Facebook

“Would you kill a disabled baby?” Professor answers “Yes.”

The following quote is from Peter Singer, who the New York Times called “the world’s most influential living philosopher” in 2000.

JB Schneewind “Don’t Bring Home the Bacon” The New York Times, December 17, 2000

Peter Singer was asked, “Would you kill a disabled baby?”

He replied:

“Yes, if that was in the best interests of the baby and of the family as a whole. Many people find this shocking, yet they support a woman’s right to have an abortion. One point on which I agree with opponents of abortion is that – from the point of view of ethics rather than the law – there is no sharp distinction between the fetus and the newborn baby.”

“Peter Singer: You Ask the Questions” The Independent September 11, 2006

Share on Facebook

Journalist discusses why journalists don’t like to write about abortion

A journalist writes about possible reasons other journalists didn’t cover the Kermit Gosnell trial:

“Writing about abortion, like writing about the Israel-Palestine conflict, guarantees (a) extreme abuse from readers no matter where you come down; (b) extreme, tedious scrutiny of every word you write; (c) certain knowledge that personal friends and family members will find themselves in strong, emotional disagreement with you; (d) the discouraging impression that no fact or argument presented will change anyone’s mind; (e) the accusation that you are complicit in something even worse than what Hitler did, or else that you hate women and want to control their bodies, or both.

There’s also the feeling that, by raising the subject, you’re bringing out the very worst in some people. The way they behave to one another in comments and characterize people on the other side of the debate over email is unsettling. Perhaps there’s a journalistic analogue of deliberately avoiding abortion at dinner parties, even ones where political debate is valued and encouraged.”

CONOR FRIEDERSDORF “14 Theories for Why Kermit Gosnell’s Case Didn’t Get More Media Attention” The Atlantic APRIL 15, 2013

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choicers: We shouldn’t save premature babies because they might be disabled

Pro-Choice authors Harold J Morowitz and James S Trefil wrote:

“… We must discuss one further disagreeable fact. In the language of physicians, the term survivability means just that: the ability of the infant to remain alive. It says nothing about what we usually call the quality of life…

Many 750 gram infants who survive turn out to have disabilities like severe cerebral dysfunction and mental retardation, and there seems to be no way of predicting the outcome of intensive care procedures. This fact has led many in the field to question the usefulness of allocating scarce research funds to pursue survivability to earlier ages…

The question that is asked is whether it is justified to expend limited medical resources in heroic efforts to keep extremely premature infants alive when there is such a need for those resources elsewhere.”

Harold J Morowitz and James S Trefil The Facts of Life: Science in the Abortion Controversy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992) 142

Since 1992 there have been many advances, and most premature babies born today do not become disabled. However, it is appalling that pro-choicers would support letting babies die because disabled people don’t deserve to have money spent on them.

 

Share on Facebook

Two Past Presidents of the ACOG say an embryo is “alive, human, and unique”

60 physicians, including two past presidents of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the former president of the American Academy of Neurology, wrote a letter to President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s that read in part:

“The developing fetus is not a subhuman species with a different genetic composition…[T]he embryo is alive, human, and unique in the special environmental support required for that stage of human development.”

Cited in Coral Ridge Ministries Ten Truths about Abortion (Fort Lauderdale, Florida: Coral Ridge Ministries, 2007) 13

Share on Facebook

Margaret Sanger calls “feebleminded” people human weeds

Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, supported eugenics and believed poor people and minorities shouldn’t reproduce. In her book Pivot of Civilization she wrote:

“Such parents swell the pathetic ranks of the unemployed. Feeblemindedness perpetuates itself from the ranks of those who are blandly indifferent to their racial responsibilities. And it is largely this type of humanity we are now drawing upon to populate our world for the generations to come. In this orgy of multiplying and replenishing the earth, this type is pari passu multiplying and perpetuating those direst evils in which we must, if civilization is to survive, extirpate by the very roots.

They are…human weeds, reckless breeders, spawning…human beings who never should have been born. Organized charity itself is the symptom of a malignant social disease…

Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks [of people] that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant.

Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying…demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism… [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others, which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste.

Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant… We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”

Margaret Sanger The Pivot of Civilization (Oxford/New York: Pergamon Press, 1922)

Share on Facebook

Abortionist says women are glad they could get pregnant when they have abortions

Dr. Lawrence Scott, who has performed “thousands of abortions in Los Angeles”:

“Women often tell me that “It’s nice to know that I can get pregnant even if it is an inconvenient time.””

Miriam Claire The Abortion Dilemma: Personal Views on a Public Issue (Xlibris Corporation, 2013) 12

Share on Facebook