The Abortionist Who Hated Women

The LA Times reported March 22, 1992,(Patients allege gynecologist hated women) that abortionist Ivan C. Namihas might harbor a hatred of women. The article, Patients allege gynecologist hated women, presented interviews and court documents indicating that Namihas allegedly impregnated at least two of his patients, and that he reportedly told one woman, whom he treated for more than 10 years, that he became a gynecologist so he could vent his anger toward women.

A patient and temporary employee of abortionist Ivan C. Namihas, said in an affidavit that she “felt he had problems with women in general because he talked about how much he hated his mother and bad relationships he’d had with girlfriends and his wives.”

Another patient of abortionist Namihas said, “He told me the reason he became a gynecologist was because he hated women and he could use a knife to cut them.”

In the Patients allege gynecologist hated women: 3-22-1992, a former employee says abortionist Ivan C. Namihas, “seemed to get some perverse pleasure” from inflicting pain on patients and several women told grisly tales of enduring excruciating procedures without anesthesia.

Assistant US attorney Jonathan S. Shapiro said, “The term abuse of a position of trust, seems to have been coined for Dr. Ivan C. Namihas, MD. Arrogant, cruel, and greedy, he carried out a particular form of fraud against his victims.”

See Us Attorney’s Bulletin (USA) Bulletin: June 1997 Volume 45, Number 3 (http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usab4503.pdf

From Life Dynamics

Share on Facebook

Abortionist Mistreats Patients

A former employee of abortionist William Malcolm Knarr, Sheri McDaniel made this comment in a sworn affidavit dated 10-22-1992:

“If women cried after the procedure it was up to the nurse to console them; if Dr. Knarr was not shouting at the nurses to ‘get them up and out.'”

 

 

Share on Facebook

Abortion Clinic Worker Mocks Women

Darla Patterson an abortion clinic worker made these observations on the website, Tales from the Clinic:

Issue #1 – June 9, 2003 – 5:53pm

“The thing people most obviously lie about when they come in for an abortion is about their drug usage. It’s always funny to look at somebody’s chart and see that they claimed to have “tried some crack” three weeks before. Like it was casually offered at a party after they turned down the wine. There are the Eddie Haskell types who deny any usage until they have to sign a couple of consent forms with the word “death” listed as a complication. Some people act like they’re little Pollyannas, happily sniffing flowers that have been laced with narcotics without their knowledge. “My friend gave me a joint but it had a little sumpin’ sumpin’ (sic) in it,” this woman told me last week, trying to do her best impression of an ingenue. Due to her indecent attire and heavy-handed application of her make-up she looked more like she was doing a bad impression of some teen idol musician/actor doing a bad impression of an innocent teen in a Lifetime movie. So I guess I know a little sumpin’ sumpin’ (sic) about pregnant women who want to have abortions….”

Share on Facebook

Dr. Brian Finkel Comments on Women

In the Phoenix New Times June 17, 1999, article, Trash-talking abortionist Dr. Brian Finkel has a message for pro-life zealots: “Kiss my ass” Finkel boasts:

“Back in the good old days, honey, I could open a woman in less than a minute and a half. It was while I was working on the abortion floor that I learned that women will do whatever it takes to have an abortion.”

Finkel was later convicted of sexually abusing patients in his office.

Share on Facebook

Abortion Patients “Out-Of-Control”

Abortion doctor Michael Benjamin gave this testimony before a Florida House Health Care Committee meeting September 14 – 15, 1989:

Speaking about the typical abortion patient,

“I think it is basically a personality type who generally has her life out of control…They drift, they tend to live for the moment in terms not only of their sexual practices but in terms of their economic lives and they are people in general who don’t think beyond the moment, who don’t plan for tomorrow, and who really will take life as it comes and deal with the rest later.”

Share on Facebook

Abortionist Badmouths Patients

Pro-choice author Magda Denes quoted an abortion doctor saying the following in her book In Necessity and Sorrow: Life and Death Inside an Abortion Hospital:

“The patients are subservient to us, and when they rebel it’s very simple: Go to somebody else….What better relationship can a man have with a woman? Besides, if you finger fuck thirty women a day with your fingers, and in a way you do, this is a form of sexual violation.”

Quoted in Mark Crutcher “Lime 5: Exploited by Choice ” (Denton, Texas: Life Dynamics Incorporated, 1996)

Share on Facebook

Abortion Nurse Photographs Women During Their Procedures

Florida abortionist Vladimar Rosenthal had a nurse named Barry Alan Hill. An investigation into his behavior discovered that the clinic was reusing syringes. Also, Hill was discovered to be to photographing the abortion patients after they were under anesthesia.

A coworker named Neat Rodrigues told investigators that she was disturbed by Hill’s objection to her showing any sympathy toward the patients. She claims that she was fired from the clinic because she complained to The National Abortion Federation about the conditions in the clinic.

Employee Wendy Castro maintained that Hill was very friendly” with the patients always asking for dates, often slapped co-workers on the buttocks, tickled and made “dirty jokes”.

She recalled on two occasions Hill bringing in pictures of other patient’s breasts.

Some of the women said they were refused anesthesia when they asked for it. Others said the doctors carrying out the abortions — all of whom were male — made abusive remarks.One woman quoted her doctor as winding up her abortion with the words:

“This really hurt, didn’t it? But let that be a lesson before you get yourself in this situation again.

This was from an investigative report by the Florida Department of Professional Regulations (DPR case # RN-89-10853) quoted by Life Dynamics

Share on Facebook

Abortion Doctors Vicious, Sadistic with Patients

From Dr. Bernard Nathanson, who presided over 60,000 abortions until this pro-life conversion. When he began working at an abortion clinic that he would eventually manage, nurses and counselors told him that two abortionists on staff were:

“vicious, even sadistic with the patients… They would use unnecessarily large instruments on women with first pregnancies, or refuse to use the local anesthetic, or show the fetal tissue to the patient when she had not asked to see it. They were sometimes so impatient that they would shout at the patients if they squirmed on the table.”

Bernard N Nathanson, M.D. with Richard N Ostling. Aborting America (Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company, 1979) p 110

Share on Facebook

D&E Is a “Horrible Procedure”

Here is another quote on the D & E procedure:

“I do D & E’s because I think it is safer. It is a horrible procedure. Staff burnout is a major problem. But are you functioning in the interests of taking care of your staff or taking care of your patients?”

Dr. William Rashbaum, a gynecologist affiliated with Beth Israel

“When Abortion Becomes Birth: A Dilemma of Medical Ethics Shaken by Advances” New York Times Feb. 15, 1984

Read a doctor’s firsthand account of the D&E abortion here.

Share on Facebook

The Sensations of Dismemberment

A D&E abortion is so gruesome that when it was first developed in the 1970s, a leading abortionist said:

“We have produced an unusual dilemma. A procedure is rapidly becoming recognized as the procedure of choice in late abortion, but those capable of performing or assisting with the procedure are having strong personal reservations about participating in an operation which they view as destructive and violent…Some part of our cultural and perhaps even biological heritage recoils at a destructive operation on a form that is similar to our own…No one who has not performed this procedure can know what it is like or what it means…We have reached a point in this particular technology where there is no possibility of denial of an act of destruction by the operator. It is before one’s eyes. The sensations of dismemberment flow through the forceps like electric current…”

Warren Hern, M.D, 1978: (Rachel M. MacNair Perpetration-Induced Traumatic Stress: The Psychological Consequences of Killing (Westport, CT:Praeger, 2002) 73

Diagram of a D&E:

Share on Facebook