Abortionist Proposes Mandating Abortions for Teenagers

“Is adolescent pregnancy a disease? We have laws regarding other epidemics. We have mandatory immunizations, but we have no laws prohibiting motherhood before the age of 14 in our supposedly civilized society. We ought to mandate against continuing pregnancy in the very young, say, those less than 14 years.”

Minnesota abortionist Jane Hodgeson

Statement made at the May 28, 1980 National Abortion Federation conference in Washington DC. Quoted In American Life League’s Abortion Encyclopedia

Share on Facebook

Magda Denes, on Viewing Thousands of Aborted Babies

“When, under one roof, the number of dead fetuses mounted to the thousands, the simple fact of death gradually overshadows the significance of individual histories.”

Pro-Choice author Magda Denes, PhD, who observed abortions in one busy hospital while writing a book on the subject

14 week-old unborn baby

 

Magda Denes, “Performing Abortions” Commentary magazine October 1976, pages 33 to 37

Share on Facebook

The Australian Medical Association on Abortion

unborn baby at nine weeks

“[At] the end of the day, the truth is that when you perform an abortion you are killing something.”

Dr. David Molloy of the Australian Medical Association

Ed Vitagliano “Murder: So What? Film Reveals Growing Callousness Toward Abortion” AFA Journal Nov/Dec 2004

Share on Facebook

54 Babies

In his article “54 Babies” George F. Will documents a shocking case where two children playing outside discovered boxes of aborted fetuses that had been improperly disposed of.

CHINO HILLS, Calif. Where Route 71 crosses over Payton Drive, at the bottom of the steeply sloping embankment, two boys, who were playing nearby, found the boxes. The boys bicycled home and said they had found boxes of “babies.”

Do not be impatient with the imprecision of their language. They have not read the apposite Supreme Court opinions. So when they stumbled on the boxes stuffed with 54 fetuses, which looked a lot like babies, they jumped to conclusions. Besides, young boys are apt to believe their eyes rather than the Supreme Court.

The first count came to a lot less than 54. Forgive the counters’ imprecision. Many fetuses had been dismembered — hands, arms, legs, heads jumbled together — by the abortionist’s vigor. An accurate count required a lot of sorting out.

The fetuses had been dumped here, about 30 miles east of Los Angeles, on March 14, 1997, by a trucker who may not have known what the Los Angeles abortion clinic had hired him to dispose of. He later served 71 days in jail for the improper disposal of medical waste. Society must be strict about its important standards.

What local authorities dealt with as a problem of solid waste disposal struck a few local residents as rather more troubling than that. They started talking to each other, and one thing led to another, and to the formation of Cradles of Love, which had the modest purpose of providing a burial for the 54 babies.

The members of Cradles of Love — just a few normal walking-around middle-class Americans — called them babies, and still do. These people are opposed to abortion, in spite of the Supreme Court’s assurance in 1973 that abortions end only “potential life.” (Twenty-five years later the Supreme Court has not yet explained how a life that is merely “potential” can be ended.)

Some will say the members of Cradles of Love, who are churchgoers, have been unduly influenced by theology. Or perhaps the real culprit is biology. It teaches that after the DNA of the sperm fuse with those of the ovum a new and unique DNA complex is formed that directs the growth of the organism. It soon is called a fetus, which takes in nourishment and converts it to energy through its own distinct, unique organic functioning, and very soon it looks a lot like a baby.

Anyway, theology or biology or maybe their eyes told the members of Cradles of Love that there were some babies in need of burials. So they asked the coroner to give them the fetuses. Then the American Civil Liberties Union was heard from.

It professed itself scandalized by this threat to . . . what? The ACLU frequently works itself into lathers of anxiety about threats to the separation of church and state. It is difficult, however, to identify any person whose civil liberties were going to be menaced if the fetuses were (these are the ACLU’s words) “released to the church groups for the express purpose of holding religious services.” The ACLU said it opposed “facilitation” of services by a public official.

The ACLU’s attack on the constitutionally protected right to the free exercise of religion failed to intimidate, and in October the babies were buried in a plot provided at no charge by a cemetery in nearby Riverside. Each baby was given a name by a participating church group. Each name was engraved on a brass plate that was affixed to each of the 54 small, white, wooden caskets made, at no charge, by a volunteer who took three days off from work to do it. Fifty clergy and four persons active in the right-to-life movement carried the caskets. Each baby’s name is inscribed on a large headstone, also provided at no charge.

Fifty-four doves, provided at no charge by the cemetery, were released at the services.

The ACLU trembled for the Constitution.

We hear much about the few “extremists” in the right-to-life movement. But the vast majority of the movement’s members are like the kindly, peaceable people here, who were minding their own business until some of the results of the abortion culture tumbled down a roadside embankment and into their lives.

Which is not to say that this episode was untainted by ugly extremism. It would be nice if the media, which are nothing if not diligent in documenting and deploring right-to-life extremism, could bring themselves to disapprove the extremism of the ACLU, which here attempted a bullying nastiness unredeemed by any connection to a civic purpose.

Source: Washington Post: December 3, 1998; Page A23

Note: A local man, Charles Lowers, whose own wife was pregnant at the time, was quoted saying: “I was thinking of [the mass graves] in World War II. It brought back that memory of senseless slaughter.”

From “Remains of Aborted Fetuses Buried” CNN Oct 12, 1998

Share on Facebook

Pro-Choice Feminist Discusses Men’s Role in Abortion

Here is one quote by pro-choice feminist Kathleen McDonnell:

“We have to acknowledge…that there is a great inconsistency between our eagerness to involve men in all other aspects of reproduction and our unwillingness to allow them a similar role in abortion. This means we must acknowledge and validate man’s role in the act of procreation. It really does take two…This stance [to deny men a choice in their partners’ abortions] poses, of course, a veritable minefield of problems…”

Kathleen McDonnell. Not an Easy Choice: a Feminist Re-Examines Abortion. (Boston: South End Press, 1984

Share on Facebook

Pro-choice Activist Complains about Pictures of Unborn Babies

At the October 1989 annual conference of the National Abortion Rights Action League, pollster Harrison Hickman stated in a workshop entitled ‘Framing and Selling the Pro-Choice Message’ that:

“Nothing has been as damaging to our cause as the advances in technology which have allowed pictures of the developing fetus, because people now talk about the fetus in much different terms than they did 15 years ago. They talk about it as a human being, which is not something that I have an easy answer how to cure.”

Quoted in Frederica Mathews-Green. Real Choices: Offering Practical, Life-Affirming Alternatives to Abortion (Sisters, Oregon: Multnomah Books, 1994) 30

sonogram in the first trimester
Share on Facebook

Abortionists Seen As Despicable

Says one abortion provider:

“An abortionist is a despicable person. They assume you did it for the money, you didn’t have the qualifications to be real doctor… You were either a drug addict, an alcoholic, a ne’er-do-well, you couldn’t maintain a practice or you were owned by the Mafia… You weren’t a good person and probably weren’t a good doctor either. At the very least, you are an embarrassment to the medical community.”

David Bennett

Carole Joffe. Doctors of Conscience: the Struggle to Provide Abortion before and after Roe Versus Wade (Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon press, 1995) 153

Share on Facebook

Abortionist: Some of My Colleagues Don’t Speak to Me

“Even my own colleagues there at University Hospital, I would be over there delivering a baby, and they would say, “What are you doing here? I didn’t think you delivered babies, I thought you just did abortions.”… Some of my colleagues don’t speak to me because I do abortions.”

Abortionist Eugene Fox, M.D

Carole Joffe. Doctors of Conscience: the Struggle to Provide Abortion before and after Roe Versus Wade (Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon press, 1995) 152

Share on Facebook

The Back Alley to the Front Alley

Eugene Fox, doctor who referred for abortion shortly after Roe V Wade:

“Some of these places were terrible. They were just back alley shops that open their doors…”

Carole Joffe. Doctors of Conscience: the Struggle to Provide Abortion before and after Roe Versus Wade (Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon press, 1995) 138

Many people don’t realize that very few legal safeguards will put in place after Roe versus Wade to protect women from unscrupulous and negligent abortion providers. In many cases, “back alley” abortionists simply hung up their shingles and began performing legal abortions. To read more about illegal abortions before Roe V Wade, go here.

Share on Facebook

Partial Birth Abortion

Partial-Birth abortions became illegal when the Supreme Court allowed a ban against them to stand. The court had previously ruled against the ban, and the law was sent back with minor changes after a new justice was confirmed.  It was a very long battle to ban this type of abortion, which usually took place between 20 and 26 weeks. Here are some pictures of how these abortions were performed.

Prominent abortionist Dr. Martin Haskell, who performed the abortion Brenda watched, was asked about the diagram in an interview, and answered that it was “accurate from a technical point of view.”

(AMA- American Medical News July 5, 1993)

He describes partial-birth abortion this way:

“At this point, the right-handed surgeon slides the fingers of the left had [sic] along the back of the fetus and “hooks” the shoulders of the fetus with the index and ring fingers (palm down). Next he slides the tip of the middle finger along the spine towards the skull while applying traction to the shoulders and lower extremities. The middle finger lifts and pushes the anterior cervical lip out of the way.

While maintaining this tension, lifting the cervix and applying traction to the shoulders with the fingers of the left hand, the surgeon takes a pair of blunt curved Metzenbaum scissors in the right hand. He carefully advances the tip, curved down, along the spine and under his middle finger until he feels it contact the base of the skull under the tip of his middle finger.

Reassessing proper placement of the closed scissors tip and safe elevation of the cervix, the surgeon then forces the scissors into the base of the skull or into the foramen magnum. Having safely entered the skull, he spreads the scissors to enlarge the opening.

The surgeon removes the scissors and introduces the suction catheter into the hole and evacuates the skull contents. With the catheter still in place, he applies traction to the fetus, removing it completely from the patient.”

He then goes on to say that the procedure can be used essentially all the way to birth.

“The author is aware of one other surgeon [J McMahon, now deceased] who uses a conceptually similar technique…Coupled with other refinements and a slower operating time, he performs these procedures up to 32 weeks or more.”

Martin Haskell, M.D. “Dilation and Extraction for Late Second Trimester Abortion” Contained in National Abortion Federation “Second Trimester Abortion: From Every Angle.” Fall Risk Management Seminar, September 13-14, Dallas, Texas. Presentations, Bibliography and Related Materials. 1992

Share on Facebook