Planned Parenthood: Children of the Poor are Too Costly

A fund-raising letter of Planned Parenthood committee of Pittsburgh:

“Have you ever stopped to consider how much the “unwanted” children of poor and ignorant parents are costing you in the community in increased relief load, state medical and mental care, juvenile delinquency, and criminality?… There is a critical need for the expansion of this work [birth control] in American slums and other areas.”

Johanna Choen Choice & Coercion: Birth Control, Sterilization, and Abortion in Public Health and Welfare (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2005)

This is an old letter from before abortion was legal, but it shows the disregard Planned Parenthood had for minorities and the poor.

Share on Facebook

Unborn baby can feel pain in abortion, says pediatric neurosurgeon

Expert testimony from Dr. Robert White, pediatric neurosurgeon, before U.S. Congress,  June 15, 1995 :

“By every measurable method, evidence suggests that the type of massive tissue destruction caused by all abortion methods at this stage [20+ weeks]  would be expected to be accompanied by substantial pain to the unborn child. “

Aborted baby torn apart at 20 weeks
Aborted baby torn apart at 20 weeks

 

 

Share on Facebook

George Will discusses pro-choice censorship when 16,500 bodies of aborted babies found

When 16,500 bodies of aborted babies were discovered in a storage container outside of a medical laboratory, some weighing as much as 4 pounds, news photographers who came to the scene were not permitted to take pictures. Later, photographs were obtained from a Los Angeles pathologist who examined the babies’ bodies. No legal action was taken. Washington Post columnist George Will made these observations:

Remains of baby aborted at 20 weeks. This child was torn apart by the abortion instruments
Remains of baby aborted at 20 weeks. This child was torn apart by the abortion instruments

“Most proabortion persons have a deeply felt understandable need to keep the discussion of abortion as abstract as possible. They become bitter when opponents use photographs to document early fetal development. The sight of something that looks so much like a child complicates the task of trying to believe that there is nothing there but “potential” life. And if fetal pain is acknowledged, America has a problem. It’s uneasy conscience about 1.6 million abortions a year [as of 1981, the number of abortions have dropped since] depends on the supposition that such pain is impossible.”

George Will “Abortion Painful for the Aborted” The Washington Post, November 5, 1981

Share on Facebook

Dr. Susie Baldwin: Abortion is Rewarding

“I provide abortions because it is the single most rewarding and gratifying field of medicine I have experienced.”

Dr. Susie Baldwin, abortionist, Los Angeles, CA

Below: Remains of an abortion at just 8 weeks. This is well within the time when most abortions are performed.

08_weeks-10_medium

Physicians for Reproductive Health “Why I Provide Abortions”

http://prh.org/provider-voices/why-i-provide-abortions/

Share on Facebook

Doctor from the University of Colorado Medical School : life begins at conception

Dr. Watson A. Bowes Jr. of the University of Colorado Medical School testified before the United State Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on when life begins:

“The beginning of a single human life is from a biological point of view a simple and straightforward matter…the beginning is conception. This straightforward biological fact should not be distorted to serve sociological, political or economic goals.”

Abortion: A Briefing Book for Canadian Legislators: National Public Affairs Office, Campaign Life Coalition, Suite 100, 1355 Wellington Street, Ottawa, ON K1Y 3C2 Phone (613) 729-0379 Fax (613) 729-7611

Share on Facebook

Seeing an aborted baby with “human form” in the second trimester is traumatic, article says

From an article in The Journal of Clinical Nursing:

16 weeks –
16 weeks –

“Second trimester terminations require the woman concerned to go through an induced labour, the result of which is a fetus in a very human form. This event requires sensitive management as it is has the potential to cause a great deal of distress for the women involved due to the psychological and physical impact of the procedure. However, health professionals involved can also find this a distressing clinical event due to the complex nature of the management and care required.”

ANNETTE D. HUNTINGTON RGON, BN, PhD “Working with women experiencing mid-trimester termination of pregnancy: the integration of nursing and feminist knowledge in the gynaecological setting” Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2002, 11 273-279

This is only one way to do a second trimester abortion. Others are done by D & E, where the baby is dismembered inside the mother’s body.

Share on Facebook

Clinic worker would rather have “3 or 4 abortions” than go to the dentist

One abortion clinic worker made the following statement:

“In Spain every single abortion is done under local [anesthesia]. It’s walk in, walk out. They come in at 4 clock, by 5 o’clock they have had the operation, the consultation, and are back home. And I was so impressed by it. I said, it’s not possible! I wouldn’t mind having 3 or 4 abortions like that rather than go to the dentist once every 5 years. They’ve mastered the technique, improved it, no fuss.”

Patricia Launneborg Abortion: a Positive Decision (New York: Bergin & Garvey, 1992) 86

She would rather have 3 or 4 abortions than go to the dentist. This statement is even more shocking when you realize that she works at the clinic and sees bodies of aborted babies (like the one below) every day. Has abortion become so trivialized that going to the dentist is considered worse?

Remains of an abortion at 9 weeks – over 40% of abortions take place after this time
Remains of an abortion at 9 weeks – over 40% of abortions take place after this time
Share on Facebook

Pro-choice activist laments pro-life “public opinion” victory

Lynn Paltrow, executive director of National Advocates for Pregnant Women [a project of the pro-abortion Women’s Law Center] described how the pro-choice side has been lacking passionate activists for their cause.

“There’s no radical left anymore screaming, `Free abortions on demand!'” The anti-abortion right scored its first public-opinion grab in 1995, with the bold war over so-called “partial-birth abortion.”

Sharon Lerner “A New Kind of Abortion War”, The Village Voice 12/26/2001

Share on Facebook

Clinic worker: “I love abortion”

part of a day's work in an abortion cliinic
part of a day’s work in an abortion cliinic

From a clinic worker who is a blogger on The Abortioneers, who uses a pseudonym on the blog:

“A very important change is being able to say the “A” word in public.… You can’t just blurt it out in public. But now that I’m confident that I love abortion and will do whatever to defend it, I have no problem… “

Sarah Erdreich Generation Roe: inside the Future of the Pro-Choice Movement (New York: Seven Stories Press, 2013) 174

Share on Facebook

Mattie Brinckerhoff on voluntary motherhood and “destroy[ing] unborn children”

Many people don’t know that the early feminists (those who fought for a woman’s right to vote in the 1800s) were mostly pro-life.

Mattie H Brinckerhoff was a popular lecturer in the Midwest on women’s suffrage and other women’s rights topics. Here is some of her writing on abortion. Her use of the term “voluntary motherhood” dealt with the choice women should have to refuse to have sex in order to avoid childbearing.

It’s hard to believe, but at the time, women had no right to refuse sex with their husbands- they could not prosecute him for rape, and culture dictated that they always be sexually available to him. This lengthy article discusses this and mentions abortion. I wanted to quote it in its entirety to give context to the part about abortion

“Woman and Motherhood” by Maddie H Brinckerhoff

“In number 25, volume 3D of The Revolution, I notice from the editor of a German paper in this state these words: “American women have long been ardently engaged in the endeavor to free themselves, in a mechanical way, from the discharge of those functions which are essential to the continuance of society, and which cannot be shared with them, or performed for them, by men.”

The gallant editor unquestionably refers to the office of maternity. This and similar articles have from time to time so ably answered in your paper, that it seems almost unnecessary to add anything further upon the subject; but the boldness with which many men blame women for the crime of infanticide without assuming themselves, in the case, a shadow of responsibility, I should think would rouse every mother, at least, to utter words in self-defense.

That American women are more guilty of this practice than women of any other nation, I do not doubt; but is there not a reason for this?

Knowledge and slavery are incompatible. Teach a slave how a read, and he wants to be his own master – and as the masses of American women not only know how to read and write, but so much of the “tree of knowledge” have many of them eaten, that they have learned it should be for them to decide when and how often they shall take upon themselves the sacred duties of motherhood, but as law and custom gives to the husband the absolute control of the wife’s person, she is forced to not only violate physical law, but outrage the holiest instincts of her being to maintain even a semblance of that freedom which by nature belongs to every human soul.

When a man steals to satisfy hunger, we may safely conclude that there is something wrong in society – so when a woman destroys the life of her unborn child, it is an evidence that either by education or circumstances she has been greatly wronged. But the question now seems to be, how shall we prevent this destruction of life and health?

Mrs. Stanton has many times ably answered it – “by the true education and independence of woman.”

Our German writer seems to think that the whole aim of a woman’s life should be motherhood. Suppose this were true, is the mission of so little importance that no preparation be required to fill it?

If, to be a first-class artist, or lawyer, it requires years of thought and culture, what preparation should be made to carve the outlines and justly balance the attributes of an immortal soul. Are little children, the germs of men and women, of so little importance that it matters not whether their mother be physically healthy or unhealthy, cultivated or uncultivated mind; expanded or dwarfed in soul?

We are forced to ask, by what law shall we decide when women is sufficiently developed in body and mind to be a good mother? Before what tribunal shall she be judged? Does not reason answer, the council chamber of her own being?

… If we would make woman free, let us teach her the alphabet of human life, make her understand and value true womanhood. Then she will scorn to be man’s petted slave. She will scorn his smiles and courtesies, when they are proffered only as an excuse for justice.

Oh motherhood! Which are opponents say is woman’s holiest mission. We cannot have true mothers without having true womanhood first.

Let us see that our daughters are developed into true women, and the office of maternity will take care of itself. Remove woman’s shackles and she will soon create a public opinion that will declare it a disgrace for a man to outrage the woman he has sworn to protect.

Then, and not till then, will man’s shackles fall, for noble manhood must be the legitimate fruit of free and exalted womanhood. Brothers, ‘tis for you as well as ourselves we plead. Will you neglect so great a salvation?”

The Revolution 4 (9): 138 – 139 (September 2, 1869)

Thanks to Mary Krane Derr.

Share on Facebook