Clinic counselor talks to ambivalent women

What one abortion clinic worker says to women who are ambivalent about having an abortion:

For the few women who arrive ambivalent or beset by guilt, Harrison’s nurse has posted statistics on the exam-room mirror: One out of every four pregnant women in the US chooses abortion. A third of all women in this country will have at least one abortion by the time they’re 45.

“You think there’s room in hell for all those women?” the nurse will ask.

Stephanie Simon “Offering Abortion, Rebirth” The Los Angeles Times 29 November 2005

These statistics have been debunked. This is the only counsel ambivalent women get. No information, no detailed discussion. This is it.

Share on Facebook

On collecting “fetal tissue”

One article discussed the H. Ronald Zielke Brain and Tissue Bank for Developmental Disorders, hosted by the University of Maryland School of Medicine. It contains fetal tissue.

“According to the bank’s 234-page “Catalog of Available Tissue,” updated July 1, it also stores tissue from hundreds of fetuses, including those with chromosomal disorders, anencephaly (a brain malformation)—and many with no disorders at all, marked as “control” tissue and spanning ages 10 to 39 weeks.”

the-1-week-fetus (1)

How does it get this “tissue”?

“Jennifer Boulanger of the Allentown Women’s Center in Allentown, Pa., said her clinic supplies tissue to the University of Washington. She said her clinic is not paid for the donations, but the university provides her staff with the supplies needed to collect and ship the specimens….To ensure tissue freshness, “the specimens are FedExed overnight” to Seattle, …The recipient, named misleadingly the Birth Defects Research Laboratory at the University of Washington in Seattle, has been sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for over four decades. It’s known within the research community as a top government distributor of fetal tissue. Last year the Puget Sound Business Journal stated the lab “in 2009 filled more than 4,400 requests for fetal tissue and cell lines.”…  To date, it has retrieved the products of 22,000 pregnancies. According to a description the lab provided in its most recent grant applications, an increase in nonsurgical abortion methods has “created new obstacles to obtaining sufficient amounts of high quality tissue. To overcome these problems and meet increasing demand, the Laboratory has developed new relationships with both local and distant clinics.”

Daniel James Devine “The Demand for Death: Medical Research & Fetal Tissue” Religion Today August 08, 2011

Share on Facebook

Abortionist: Abortion is a moral choice”

From one abortionist:

remains of aborted babies
remains of aborted babies

“There are even members of the pro-choice community who are questioning the morality of reproductive freedom. These people believe that abortion must be available, but that it is inherently bad – a necessary evil.… In fact, the decision to have an abortion is clearly an extremely moral choice; it is a choice that liberates, empowers, and benefits women that society.”

Henry Morgentaler, “The Moral Case for Abortion” Free Inquiry, Summer 1996

Share on Facebook

Unborn children have short-term memory, Dutch study finds

Dutch researchers say unborn children may have their short-term memory formed at 30 weeks into the pregnancy. Dr. Jan G. Nijhuis, director of the Centre for Genetics, Reproduction and Child Health at Maastricht University Medical Centre in Holland, conducted the research.From the article in LifeNews:

He [Nijhuis] and his team published their findings in the July/August issue of Child Development.

“This is the next step into a better insight in the development of the fetal central nervous system,” he told HealthDailyNews. “We aim to develop an ‘intra-uterine neurologic examination,’ which could then be used in fetuses at risk.”

In the research, the Netherlands scientists surveyed 93 pregnant women and they measured the responses from unborn children to repeated “vibroacoustic” stimulation.

“We used a vibroacoustic stimulator, which leads to a combined stimulus of vibration and sound,” Nijhuis told HDN. “The stimuli were applied to the maternal abdomen above the fetal legs for a period of one second every 30 seconds. We counted the number of stimuli after which the fetus does not respond anymore.”

When the unborn baby no longer responds to the audio stimulus, the child is referred to as “habituated” — in other words, they consider the sounds safe.

Researchers consider that a form of learning, where unborn children are aware of potential danger and recognize the sounds as something that will not harm them.

Dr. Richard O. Jones, an assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, responded to the study.

“I’m almost certain the baby heard it quite clearly and it was probably pretty loud,” he said.

“I almost wish I could do an ultrasound looking at the baby while they were making these loud noises. I would not be at all surprised to see the baby putting its hands over its ears,” he added.

Steven Ertelt “Unborn Children May Already Have Short-Term Memory Formed at 30 Weeks” LifeNews July 15, 2009

Share on Facebook

Abortion is “terrible and necessary” says pro-choicer

 “Our culture needs new rituals as well as laws to restore abortion to its sacred dimension, which is both terrible and necessary.””

Pro-choicer Ginette Paris

Ginette Paris, The Sacrament of Abortion, trans. Joanna Mott (Dallas: Spring Publications, 1992), pp. 92

palm-of-the-right-hand (1)

aborted at 11 weeks
aborted at 11 weeks

Is killing this baby really necessary?

 

Share on Facebook

Abortionist doesn’t want to think he’s “killing a baby”

One doctor describes why he finds it difficult to be an abortionist:

“Killing a baby is not the way I want to think about myself.”

From the book Second Trimester Abortion: Perspectives After a Decade of Experience (Berger, Brenner, Keith, eds, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1981), in the chapter “Psychological Impact on Patients and Staff,” p. 246.

Share on Facebook

British pro-abortion activist: it doesn’t matter if babies feel pain

“Pain is a factor in life; could an element of pain be a justification for no more abortions? I don’t think so.”

Anne-Marie Keary, head of Britain’s National Abortion Campaign, explaining why the fact that unborn babies feel pain should not be a reason to oppose abortion

Sue Brattle. “Can a Foetus Feel Pain?” London Daily Express, August 6, 1996, pages 25 and 26.

Late-term abortion. Did this baby feel pain while he was being dismembered?
Late-term abortion. Did this baby feel pain while he was being dismembered? Anne-Marie Keary Doesn’t care

Information on fetal pain

Share on Facebook

Mother of child with down syndrome: abortion of handicapped babies “impoverishes us all”

From the mother of a child with Down Syndrome:

“I hate the thought that there will be fewer people with Down syndrome in the world as a result of advances in prenatal testing. As I’ve written before, it impoverishes us all when we selectively abort babies based upon particular characteristics (gender, for instance, in China and India … disabilities here in America). But I also hate the thought that mothers of children with Down syndrome think they are alone. Yes, some women choose abortion when they see a karyotype with three 21st chromosomes. But many other choose life.”

Amy Julia Becker “90% of Babies With Down Syndrome Aborted? Really?” Pantheos June 17, 2011

Share on Facebook

Association of Planned Parenthood physicians discusses the emotional effects of the D & E abortion procedure on doctors

A report presented at the 1977 annual meeting of the Association of Planned Parenthood physicians describes the negative psychological reactions doctors may have after performing D&E abortions [which were then new]:

“When performing a D&E abortion, the gynecologist is aware of being the active agent in the procedure. On the one hand, the doctor is sparing the patient the pain and emotional distress of the amnio abortion. On the other hand, he or she is the one who is crushing and dismembering the fetus in a D&E procedure, which can be emotionally disturbing… As the doctor tends to take responsibility and assume guilt for the procedure, she or he may have disturbing and recurrent ruminations or dreams. Doctors have found that these negative reactions decrease as they get used to the procedure, decrease if fewer D&E’s are done per session, and may depend on their feelings about the women’s reason for needing a late abortion… Because of these problems, it is important that participation in D&E abortions be entirely voluntary, and that doctors have a chance to talk over their feelings with understanding colleagues or counselors.”

“2nd Trimester Abortion by Dilation and Extraction (D&E): Surgical Techniques and Psychological Reactions.”, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Planned Parenthood Physicians in Atlanta, Georgia, 13 – 14. October 1977 by Drs. Sadja Goldsmith, Nancy B. Kaltrevider, and Alan J. Margolis

The paper goes on to explain a little more detail what the procedure is so traumatizing:

“When the amniotic fluid had drained, the placenta and fetus were removed: the fetus was extracted in small pieces to minimize cervical trauma. The fetal head was often the most difficult object to crush and remove because of its size and contour. The operator kept track of each portion of the fetal skeleton in order to be sure of complete evacuation. Finally, a blunt or sharp curette, and a 12 mm vacuum aspirator were used, which often yielded additional tissue fragments. The patient was then transferred to the recovery room, watched for about 2 hours, and sent home with a friend.”

Diagram of a D & E
Diagram of a D & E

See pictures of what a 20-week-old baby looks like after being subjected to this procedure (warning: graphic)

Share on Facebook

It is “respectful”of human life to do experiments on embryonic humans

The National Institute of Health meeting held a meeting that discussed the ethics of experimenting on human embryos.

Panel consultant Charles McCarthy said that perhaps experimenting on these developing human lives is respecting them – somehow. In his own words:

“using or involving an embryo in research may, in and of itself be a mark of respect” even if involves destroying and discarding the embryo.

Panelist Brigid Hogan agreed:

“Perhaps the way you can show the most respect to an embryo is to do the very best possible research with it from a scientific point of view.”

Yes, poking and prodding and splicing and injecting chemicals into a developing human embryo is more respectful than allowing it to be implanted so it could grow into the baby it’s meant to become. Sometimes you just can’t explain this kind of twisted thinking.

Richard Doerflinger , “the Human Embryo Research Panel: Creating Life to Destroy It”

From the pamphlet “Fetal Experimentation: Violating Ethical Standards” Life Cycle, March 1996

Share on Facebook