Legal Abortion Death: Jammie Garcia, 15 (Massive, Systemic Infection)

Christina Dunigan writes:

Raise your hand if you’ve heard about how abortion just has to be legal, or else women would have to face them grisly back-alley abortions.

Of all the justifications for the current state of abortion in the United States, this is the one that probably steams me the most, personally. I’ve reviewed about 6,000 abortion injury and death cases. I’ve gone through boxes of nothing but autopsy reports on young women and girls dead for no good reason.

The idea that it’s okay to kill some women legally in order to prevent other women from being killed illegally gets to me.

We can start with Jammie Garcia.

When the documents for Lime 5 were pouring in, I was an abstracting machine. I had a three to four foot stack of documents in my office on any given day that I had to plow through, skim, highlight, read, summarize. I learned to be very detached and clinical, to just get the words and ideas and not let it get to me. But Jammie Garcia got to me.

The first document I reviewed was a March 1994 report on an inspection done in response to a patient death in a clinic owned by Dr. Moshe Hachamovitch. The report said that the staff were inadequately trained in how to properly sterilize instruments. The administrator, Kristen Hing Fehr, was evidently aware of the fact that the autoclave used to sterilize instruments was not functioning properly.

As for the instruments themselves, “two loop forceps, two tenaculums and one curette were found to have small particles of dried brownish-dark red material on them. Three speculums were found to have small particles of dried clear material on them.” “The only sterilized abortion tray in the procedure room was found to contain a curette with a loop whose edge was visibly jagged instead of smooth.” (Source: Travis County District Court Cause No. 94-07517)

Untrained staff? Dirty instruments? Indifferent administration? That’s not enough to even get my attention. I’d read one report in which the inspectors asked the staff to demonstrate that the emergency generator was functioning properly. The generator caught fire. I’d seen reports of dogs in clinics, bloody bare mattresses, drunken abortionists falling on the floor. So Moshe Hachamovitch’s little abortion mill didn’t stand out for its flaws.

Then there was the case of the patient whose death had brought on the inspection. She was identified as 15-year-old “J.G.” That was a bad one. It was always hard to read details on a death, but dead kids get to me. I have a daughter myself.

“J.G.” had her abortion performed by John Coleman at Hachamovitch’s A to Z abortion facility on February 18, 1994. Four days later, on February 23, she was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of a Houston hospital, with spiking fever, chills, nausea, pain, respiratory distress, a distended abdomen, low blood oxygen levels, and foul-smelling discharge. An examination revealed inflammation and a tear in her cervix that was oozing pus. “J.G.’s” condition deteriorated, and she died in the Intensive Care Unit on March 2.

This was all tragic, very sad, but again, typical for what I’d see in an abortion death. I dutifully wrote up the case while Mona tried to get more information.

She got a copy of the autopsy report.

When I hear about how we need legal abortion to prevent those horrible back-alley abortions, I can see Mona and me sitting and reading that autopsy report. Mona came across the hall with Jammie’s autopsy report in one hand, and another autopsy report in another. She wanted me to really grasp how swollen and boggy Jammie’s organs were. Jammie’s liver and lungs weighed twice what they should have weighed.

Then Mona and I sat down together and read the rest of the autopsy report. By the time we were done, we were both crying, telling each other, “She was unconscious by then. She had to have been unconscious.”

Please, God, let her have been unconscious.

Jammie’s body was wracked with abscesses, spreading infection that had entered her body through the damage the abortion had done to her uterus. Her brain was swollen. As near as Mona and I could figure, Jammie’s fetid fluids had made their way up through her damaged bowels and into her lungs.

Nobody’s little girl should have to die that way.

I’m sorry, but nobody can convince me that Jammie’s death was an improvement on the old back-alley abortions. No drunken, trenchcoat-clad pervert with a rusty coathanger could have done more damage, could have killed her any more horribly.

I will never understand the stubborn instance that when a pregnant woman faces challenges, somebody has to die. Why? Why, with so many adoptive homes for her child, did Jammie have to die? Why, with so many prolife pregnancy centers standing by to help her, did Jammie have to die?

Abortion laws didn’t kill Jammie Garcia. An abortionist did. Does the fact that he did it in a legally operating “clinic,” with medical instruments instead of with a coathanger, make her any less dead?

Abortion advocate dismiss girls like Jammie. “These things happen,” they shrug. “All surgery has risks.”

Why does that not comfort me? Or, perhaps more to the point, why would it comfort anybody? Why is that good enough for the self-appointed guardians of girls like Jammie?

Women — and little girls like Jammie Garcia — will continue to die, as long as they continue to perceive abortion as an escape. And they will continue to perceive it as an escape as long as there is a multi-million-dollar advertising campaign shouting from the rooftops the wonders and benefits of safe-n-legal abortion.

The way to end the horrible abortion deaths isn’t to make excuses for the abortionists who kill girls like Jammie. The way to end the horrible abortion deaths isn’t to promote abortion — it’s to end abortion. And the way to end abortion is to start caring about the women more than about politics. Abortion needs to be feared, dreaded, shunned, recoiled from, rejected, not held up as a right and celebrated. And we need to start thinking less about lifestyles of the rich and famous, and more of the life of the mother.

Planned Parenthood opposes laws requiring abortion clinics to be inspected and meet the same health care standards as other facilities.

Share on Facebook

Legal Abortion Death: Angela Hall, 27 (Embolism and Infection)

Angela Hall, a 27-year-old mother of five, called to arrange a safe, legal abortion at Thomas Tucker’s office in Alabama. One of Tucker’s employees, Joy Davis, screened Angela and felt that she had risk factors that made abortion in an office setting unsafe.

Joy got on the phone with Tucker and indicated that she felt that Angela should be referred to a hospital. Tucker told Davis that “we need the money” and ordered her to prep Angela, who was in the second trimester of pregnancy.

Angela underwent the abortion on June 11, 1991, and started having difficulty breathing. Her blood pressure fell, setting off an alarm on a piece of monitoring equipment. Tucker told Davis to turn the alarm off because other patients could hear it. Angela was sent to a recovery room where she bled so heavily that Davis became alarmed and called an ambulance. Tucker swore at Davis when he learned of this, and he had her cancel the ambulance because they’d already sent a patient to the hospital that day. Angela continued to hemorrhage, and Davis continued to plead with Tucker to take action. Finally Tucker cursed at Davis, telling her to call the ambulance, and he left the building, leaving the untrained woman to cope alone with the critically injured patient.

Angela was taken to the hospital, where she suffered respiratory failure, clotting, and sepsis. She died just before midnight June 14. The autopsy found numerous tears and lesions in the pelvic area, and congestive necrosis in Angela’s liver and spleen. The doctors concluded that amniotic fluid embolism had caused clotting problems resulting in necrosis, septic shock, and cardiac arrest.

When Alabama authorities subpoenaed Angela’s records, Tucker ordered Davis to destroy some and falsify others. Davis tore up the records, but then taped them back together and provided the authorities with photocopies.

It is interesting to note that in the publicity surrounding the lawsuit filed by Angela’s family, Ron Fitzsimmons of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, among other prochoice groups, balked at efforts to close Tucker down, on the grounds that he was Alabama’s only abortionist, and that even he was better than no abortionist at all.

Fitzsimmons was quoted saying, of his support for Tucker:

“…It’s a real choice [to oppose Tucker], because you could end up with someone worse – or no doctor at all… [I understood that abortionist Tommy Tucker had problems at his clinic] but I thought “if Tommy leaves, what’s going to happen? No one is going to be there”

Credit: Source: Jefferson County Circuit Court Case No. CV93-00632

Share on Facebook

Legal Abortion Death: Lou Ann Herron, 33 (Hemorrhage)

Abortion doctor John Biskind left the clinic after performing an abortion on 33 year old Lou Ann Herron. In a trial that later took place, Biskind admitted that after he received a frantic call from the clinic staff saying that Herron had no pulse and was not breathing, he went to his tailor rather than coming back to the clinic.

According to reports, when called, Biskind said, “Well, what do you want me to do? Call 911.”

Here is the story:

The Pregnancy

Medical assistant Sylvia Aragon wept on the witness stand as she said that Lou Ann’s pregnancy was “too far along” for an abortion. Aragon said that she thought abortionist John Biskind kept ordering more and more ultrasound scans to try to get one that would document the pregnancy as being early enough for the abortion to be legal. A total of seven ultrasounds were done before an estimate of 23 weeks was obtained the day prior to the abortion. Although Arizona law allows the abortionist to have final judgment about whether or not the fetus is viable, and therefore past the legal limit for abortion, the standard point for viability is believed to be around 24 weeks. The ultrasound Aragon did on April 9 showed a 26-week fetus.

If the abortion was indeed being done after 24 weeks, Arizona law requires that two physicians be present. Biskind was the only physician attending Lou Ann’s abortion. Arizona law also limits abortions after 24 weeks to those that an abortionist can try to justify on the grounds that it was necessary to preserve the health and safety of the mother — a nonsensical concept, since after 24 weeks a conscientious physician faced with a gravely ill patient will perform an emergency c-section in a hospital operating room; he will not perform a risky late abortion in a freestanding clinic.

There were no health concerns in Lou Ann’s case anyway, the prosecution noted. She sought the abortion because she already had two children and was separated from her husband.

The Abortion

Prosecutors said that Biskind had ordered a total of seven ultrasounds performed, with estimates ranging from 23 weeks 3 days to 26 weeks. However, only the ultrasound that showed the pregnancy as 23 weeks 3 days was forwarded to the medical examiner; the others were lost or destroyed by the facility. Biskind’s defense held that no attempts were made to fudge ultrasounds, nor were records tampered with or destroyed.

The abortion was performed at 1:30 p.m. Biskind, his lawyer said, noted a small amount of blood on the sheets when he checked on Lou Ann after the abortion, but that he was not concerned because bleeding is normal after an abortion.

The Aftermath

20/20 did a show on what happened to Lou Ann.

Theresa Jensen, a medical assistant at the clinic told 20/20 that Lou Ann was “laying in a thickness of blood. Bleeding heavily from the waist down, to her toes. She lay there like that for three hours.”

It was then, according to the police report, another assistant went to get Biskind, who was having his lunch. Jensen continued, “She came back to me, and she said, “He’s (the abortionist) mad. He didn’t want to be disturbed.” And then, as the day went on, Lou Anne didn’t get any better. When the last abortion was performed, the doctor punched out. He left.”

Finally, another medical assistant insisted on calling 911, according to the police report, over the objections of the clinic administrator. The attorney for the woman’s family stated, “There’s a hospital right across the street. They chose not to call the ambulance, not to call 911, when they knew she was in jeopardy.”

Prosecutors estimate that by the time paramedics were summoned, Lou Ann had lost 2 to 3 litres of blood.

When the rescue crew arrived, Phoenix fire captain Biran Tobin testified, Lou Ann was wearing an oxygen mask, but had not been intubated. There was also no IV in place. “I very quickly felt that there wasn’t a lot of competent medical care going on at the time,” he said.

Tobin testified that Lou Ann appeared to be dead. Nobody at the clinic seemed aware of how grave her condition was, he said, and nobody seemed to be helping her in any way. Staff told Tobin that Lou Ann’s vitals were pulse 100, blood pressure 90/50. “It was very difficult for me to believe that they could get the vital signs of a woman who, even as we walked in the door, looked really dead,” he said.

Biskind surrendered his license to practice medicine in Arizona after Lou Ann’s death in order to stop an ongoing medical board investigation of the circumstances and his handling of the case.

The Trial

A former Maricopa County medical examiner testified that the tear in LouAnne’s uterus was caused by medical instruments, and not by a fetal body part as the defense suggested. However, even had the injury been caused by a fetal body part, this is an expected complication and would not have excused Biskind from his duty to notice and treat the injury.

Emergency room physician John Gallagher testified that, based on his assessment of Lou Ann’s condition, she could have been saved had she been brought into surgery promptly. This assessment is in keeping with a CDC study concluding that given the training and resources available to physicians, no woman need bleed to death from a legal abortion.

Gallagher trains paramedics for the Phoenix Fire Department. He said that the records he reviewed clearly indicated that Lou Ann’s condition was life threatening as she lay bleeding after her abortion, and that Biskind should have recognized the severity of her injuries. Gallagher testified that the records clearly indicated serious trouble at 1:25 p.m., 16 minutes after Lou Ann had been taken to the recovery room. He said that had he been treating her, he would have ordered more IV fluids and blood immediately, and summoned an ambulance to take her to a hospital where she could be treated in a properly equipped operating room.

Gallagher noted that during her last hours in the recovery room, Lou Ann became combative, anxious and frightened, and that she reported her legs were going numb. These, he noted, are all clear signs of severe blood loss. Instead of recognizing the danger she was in, Gallagher noted, Biskind instead tried to calm Lou Ann and reassure her that she would be “just fine.”

Dr. Sidney Wecsler, an abortion expert testifying for the prosecution, said that the letter Biskind wrote to the medical board describing Lou Ann’s death misrepresented both her condition and his treatment of her. The letter, dated June 1, 1998, said that Boskind checked on Lou Ann at 1:25 p.m., and that “pulse and blood pressure were satisfactory.” The medical records, however, show that Lou Ann’s blood pressue was low at that time, a symptom of severe blood loss. Biskind also said in the letter that Lou Ann was alert and talking when he left the clinic at 4:05, which Wecsler said would have been impossible for the moribund patient who was certainly dead by the time paramedics arrived twenty minutes later.

Wechsler said that Biskind surely knew as early as 3:15 p.m. that Lou Ann was not alert, because he ordered a drug to arouse her, which did not work. Biskind’s letter makes no mention of administering this drug.

Biskind’s defense has been claiming that the assistants at the clinic failed to keep Biskind informed of Lou Ann’s deteriorating condition. But Biskind’s letter to the medical board claims that he himself checked on her every 30 to 45 minutes.

Wechsler was cross-examined by Biskind’s lawyer. The lawyer contends that the assistants could have misjudged how much blood Lou Ann was losing, and that Lou Ann’s low blood pressure may have been due to medication and not hemorrhage. Wechsler didn’t budge from his initial assessment, that Biskind had plenty of evidence and had no legitimate reason to claim ignorance of Lou Ann’s life-threatening condition.

Wechsler said that Biskind should have done a pelvic exam and other tests to determine exactly what was wrong with Lou Ann as she lay, frantic and bleeding, in the recovery room. If nothing else, Wechsler said, the fact that Lou Ann was still in recovery three hours after her abortion, long after other patients were up and about and discharged from the facility, should have alerted Biskind to the fact that something was seriously wrong.

A doctor who specializes in obstetric ultrasounds testified that the quality of the scan used to justify Lou Ann’s abortion was so poor that it appeared the machine was defective and improperly used. The judge ordered struck from the record the expert’s comment that reading an ultrasound properly is “a matter of life and death” for an unborn baby.

Biskind’s defense was largely based on the idea that no physician would have rationally have left the facility had he realized that Lou Ann was in danger of bleeding to death from the hole in her uterus. The defense also holds that Biskind did not order multiple ultrasounds, but that the fetus was truly 23 weeks.

The prosecution noted that the clinic charged $1,250 for an abortion between 20 and 24 weeks, and indicated that it was this fee, and not any medical concern for Lou Ann, that led Biskind to proceed with an abortion.

Biskind’s attorney also indicated that Biskind informed Lou Ann of the risks of a late abortion before she signed the consent form.

Biskind’s co-defendant, Carole Stuart-Schanoff, had a defense based on the idea that as administrator of the facility, she had no medical training, took no role in patients’ medical care, and therefore was not responsible for what happened in the clinic she was running. Prosecutors point out that Stuart-Schadoff scheduled the abortion, and that she scheduled it despite knowing that there would be no registered nurse attending the recovery room that day. The prosection also noted that Stuart-Schadoff delayed calling 911, choosing to call Biskind first.

Lois Montagno, an RN from the now closed A-Z Women’s Center, testified that she told Stuart-Schadoff a week in advance that she would not be able to work past noon on August 17, 1998, the day Stuart-Schadoff scheduled Lou Ann Herron for her fatal abortion. This supports the prosecution’s contention that Stuart-Schadoff was responsible for leaving Lou Ann in the care of medical assistants, who would not be qualified to supervise the recovery room.

Montagno also testified that she left a note to remind the supervisor, and told her as she was leaving on the 17th, reminding Stuart-Schadoff to tell Biskind that there would be no RN in the recovery room. Montagno did not tell Biskind she was leaving; she testified that he was in the procedure room at the time and she did not want to interrupt him.

Upon retiring to deliberate at 1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, the jury of seven women and one man immediately agreed that the defendants were guilty. It was simply a matter of deciding which charges they were guilty of: the manslaughter charge, or the lesser charge of negligent homicide. It took them 4 1/2 hours to conclude that Biskind was guilty of manslaughter, Stuart-Schadoff of negligent homicide.

Lou Ann’s family, which occupied two rows of the courtroom during the trial, wept as the verdicts were read. They met with members of the jury afterward.

Jury foreman Russell Craig, 56, spoke for the jury in the aftermath of the abortion death trial. He reported that he and other jurors were haunted by vivid dreams. He was particularly disturbed by the autopsy photos.

Only after the trial was over did members of the jury learn of Biskind’s history of misconduct, including the previous death of another abortion patient. Craig said that this information “makes me feel better about my decision.”

After the verdict, County Attorney Romley called for tougher laws addressing the way the Board of Medical Examiners handles doctors with problems.

One clinic employee told 20/20 that she was instructed to lie about what had happened. “We were told that if anybody asks what happened to say that it didn’t really happen, it’s just a lie that the [pro-life] protesters made up.”

The Owner

A-Z owner Moshe Hachamovitch testified, news reports say, “reluctantly and under tight security.” When questioned about his knowledge of procedures at the facility, and about Lou Ann’s death, he responded, “I don’t remember.” He did, however, indicate that he called Biskind a few weeks after the death to discuss the case, but did not say what, if any, conclusions he reached about how the situation was handled.

Hachamovitch admitted that the clinic did not have a procedures manual, but said that Biskind was “excellent at doing second-trimester abortions.” Hachamovitch indicated that he himself is an expert on late abortions, having performed “hundreds of thousands of them” during his 41 years of practice, going back to pre-Roe days in New York. However, Hachamovitch’s license had been suspended in New York for nine months on the grounds of gross negligence, gross incompetence, and inaccurate patient records. His license was again suspended in New York for practicing fraudulently and failing to maintain adequate records.

Hachamovitch himself performed the fatal abortions on Tanya Williamson, Luz Rodriguez, and Christina Goesswein. Jammie Garcia died after a safe and legal abortion at Hachamovitch’s Texas facility.

Here is a portion of the 911 call that was finally made by clinic workers:

911 Dispatcher: 911. What is your emergency?

Clinic worker: Well, one of our patients is unconscious. She’s lost quite a bit of blood and she’s pale.

911 Dispatcher : Is she breathing OK?

Clinic Worker: No, she’s not.

911 Dispatcher: OK, do you have oxygen on her?

Clinic Worker : No, we don’t.

911 Dispatcher : Do you have oxygen available?

Clinic Worker : Hmm. Can we get it on? I don’t know if we have any in there. Could we have you come to the side doors, right on 10th street, and try not to use no sirens?

Sources: Life Dynamics, Christina Dunigan

Share on Facebook

Legal Abortion Death: Magdalena Ortega Rodriguez, 23 (Hemorrhage Due To Lacerated Cervix, Uterus, Bladder, and Colon)

On December 8, 1994, 23-year-old Magdalena went to Suresh Gandotra’s clinic, El Norte Clinica Medica, for what she thought was a safe, legal second-trimester abortion. Gandotra later said, “I knew I screwed up,” when he pulled out bowel instead of fetal parts.

Gandotra called a hospital and asked for directions to send Magdalena there by car. The staff at the hospital insisted that Magdalena should be transported by ambulance. They began to assemble an expert team for the expected catastrophic injuries.

In the mean time, Gandotra left Magdalena unattended while he did abortions on other patients. After a half-hour delay, he finally called an ambulance, but did not inform them of the hospital that was awaiting her arrival with a team ready to treat her. When the ambulance crew arrived, they found Magdalena in ventricular fibrillation, with no pulse, bleeding, and on the floor. The ambulance crew was not informed about the hospital that was awaiting this critically injured patient, so they took Magdalena to another hospital, one that was not prepared to treat a patient with her specific injuries.

Gandotra called a hospital and asked for directions to send Magdalena there by car. The staff at the hospital insisted that Magdalena should be transported by ambulance. They began to assemble an expert team for the expected catastrophic injuries.

Gandotra sent Magdalena to the hospital without a medical history or any information about her condition or what he’d done to her. The staff were totally unprepared for what they found when they examined her. Magdalena had no vitals on arrival at hospital. She was unresponsive with fixed, dilated pupils.

When the surgeon at the hospital opened Magdalena’s peritoneum, it was so distended with blood that the operating room was spattered with the escaping blood. Magdalena’s uterus was ruptured, with a fetal limb protruding into her abdomen. Her cervix, uterus, bladder, and colon were lacerated. The mangled and partially dismembered fetus was of approximately 30 weeks gestation. As the autopsy describes it, “the body of the baby was not complete when autopsied. Both arms had been cut off; the heart, lungs, liver, and other organs had been cut out, the front of the chest and abdomen were missing, the right femur was fractured, the head was intact except for an area on the scalp which had been taken off from the back of the head.”

Magdalena bled to death during surgery. Her death was attributed to “complications of the acute pelvic injuries which consisted of lacerations of the lower uterus, vagina, bladder and colon.”

Gandotra told the medical board that he had delayed calling an ambulance because he had no admitting privileges and that the patient had asked to be released so she could walk home. Gandotra’s attorney said, “We don’t believe this was blow the standard of care nor do we believe it was malpractice.” A nurse at the hospital that tried to save Magdalena’s life said, “I’ve never seen anything like this before and I don’t want to again.”

Sources: San Diego Reader 12/13/94; San Diego Union-Tribune 12/13/94, 12/17/94; Orange County Register 12/15/94; Santa Monica Outlook December 1994; Los Angeles Times 3/21/95; San Diego County South Bay Judicial District, California Superior Court Case No. S6003494; San Diego County Superior Court Case No. 661720; San Diego County Court Case No. 643695.

Credit: Christina Dunigan

Share on Facebook

Legal Abortion Death: Edrica Goode (Infection)

Edrica went to a Planned Parenthood in Riverside, California, on January 31, 2007, for a safe, legal second-trimester abortion. She was a little over 14 weeks pregnant.

A nurse there inserted laminaria to dilate Edrica’s cervix, although Edrica had “odiferous creamy-colored discharge”, indicative of a vaginal infection, at the time. Laminaria are sticks of seaweed that absorb moisture and expand, so they would wick any bacteria or viruses from the vagina into the uterus.

Edrica, who had not told her family about the abortion, did not return to the facility to have the laminaria removed and the abortion completed because her mental state had deteriorated overnight. She had became feverish, her mother said. She became mentally “confused and disoriented,” not knowing what day it was, and started acting aggressively. She also began vomiting.

Planned Parenthood’s patient profile for Edrica said that they mailed Edrica two letters telling her that she had to return and have the laminaria removed, but Edrica’s mother said that the letters never arrived. She does indicate that Planned Parenthood called, but that Edrica was too sick to take the calls.

Edrica’s family took her to Riverside County Regoinal Medical Center on February 4. A blood test there revealed the pregnancy to the physicians, but the hospital did not perform a pelvic exam because at the time Edrica was unable to consent to the examination due to confusion and inappropriate speech.

Edrica was treated in the medical ward for five days, then transferred to a psychiatric unit, which promptly sent her back to the medical unit to have them check her for possible sepsis. There, her condition continued to deteriorate. After Edrica’s boyfriend told her family about the visit to Planned Parenthood, staff at the hospital performed a pelvic examination and discovered the laminaria, along with some gauze. Edrica miscarried that day, and died the next day, Valentine’s Day.

The coroner’s report attributes Edrica’s death to toxic shock syndrome, prolonged retention of laminaria, and pregnancy. Which means that her death will likely be counted as a pregnancy death by health statisticians, but not as an abortion death because no abortion actually took place.

Edrica had been a student at Riverside Community College. Her mother said that she enjoyed traveling and reading. Her mother commented, “I can’t understand why Planned Parenthood failed to resume contact after starting the procedure. My daughter made a choice, but she didn’t choose to die. They should have come to my home.” My daughter made a choice, but she didn’t choose to die.” She added, “A lost dog gets more attention than my daughter did. This has really torn at my family.”

Edrica is the third known death among Planned Parenthood patients in California in the last four years. Holly Patterson, 18, died of an infection after an RU-486 abortion in 2003. Diana Lopez, 25, bled to death in 2002 after her cervix was punctured during the procedure. Edrica’s mother’s lawyer indicates that Planned Parenthood did not report any of these deaths to the state, as required by law.

State records indicate that the clinic in question was last inspected in July of 2003. The inspection found 12 deficiencies, most involving recordkeeping and documentation problems that were to be corrected by Sept. 20, 2003. The file doesn’t show if the corrections were made or not.

Credit: Christina Dunigan

Sources: Los Angeles Times June 21, 2007 here

Moreno Valley Local News

Share on Facebook

Legal Abortion Death: Gwendolyn Drummer, 15 (Organ Damage Due To Saline Poisoning)

Fifteen-year-old Gwendolyn Drummer was a student at Harry Ellis High in Richmond, California, when she was admitted to Doctor’s Hospital of Pinole for a safe and legal abortion, to be performed January 28, 1972. Her doctor chose the saline abortion method.

These abortions are performed by replacing amniotic fluid with a strong salt solution. In the decades after WWII, saline was being abandoned in countires where abortion was legal, in favor of safer methods. But as laws loosened up in the US, American docors adopted the method. A British study published in 1966 found that the saline would enter the mother’s bloodstream and cause brain damage. Swedish researchers noticed an unacceptably high rate of complications and deaths. Sweden and the Soviet Union followed Japan in abandoning saline abortion as too dangerous by the late 1960s.

Gwendolyn’s doctor injected the saline into her uterus. It got into Gwendolyn’s blood stream, just as British, Japanese, Soviet, and Swedish doctors had repeatedly warned it could do. Gwendolyn suffered organ damage. She developed pneumonia, and died on January 31.

Sources: California Certificate of Death, File # 72-032193; Contra Costa County (CA) Coroner’s Report, Case # CR-72-122

Credit: Christina Dunigan

Share on Facebook