Indian women induce illnesses in unwanted baby girls, commit infanticide

Writer and researcher Gita Aravamudan describes how female babies were killed in villages in India:

“Female infanticide I found had become more “scientific”. Inducing pneumonia was the modern method. The infant was wrapped in a wet towel or dipped in cold water as soon as it was born or when it came back home from the hospital. If, after a couple of hours, it was still alive it was taken to a doctor who would diagnose pneumonia and prescribe medicine, which the parents promptly threw away. When the child finally died, the parents had a medical certificate to prove pneumonia. Sometimes the infant was fed a drop of alcohol to create diarrhea: another “certifiable disease.”

Gita Aravamudan Disappearing Daughters: the Tragedy of Female Foeticide (New Delhi, India: Penguin Books India, 2007)22

They did this because bodies could be exhumed so killing had to be done stealthily

Share on Facebook

New Zealand nurses do not want to assist doctors doing abortions

“It’s not an area of practice where many staff choose or are comfortable to work.”

Nurses have a particular difficulty with late-term abortions (usually described as abortions after 20 weeks or so)

“A lot of those nurses are quite happy to be involved in early abortions but with the increasing gestation they do find it difficult.”

Dr Sparrow said this was because of the greater development of the fetus, “rather than having a complete moral objection to abortion”.

Martin Johnson “More nurses opting out of abortion ops” NZ Herald Feb 4, 2009

Nurses in New Zealand have been refusing to participate in abortion procedures, particularly late term ones. Nurses participating in late-term abortions have to witness the extraction of fetal parts, including arms and legs, or tend to women who were delivering dead babies who have been injected with digoxin or another poison. It is not surprising that many of them are refusing to assist. Abortion has an emotional effect on providers as well as patients.

14 weeks
Share on Facebook

Pro-lifers arrange medical care for pregnant woman without insurance

The Baptist Press reported a story where some pro-life activists using a mobile ultrasound unit helped a woman in the 3rd trimester of her pregnancy acquire medical care.

“One young woman came by our mobile center who was 33 weeks along in her pregnancy and had not had any prenatal care,” Hendry recounted. “She wasn’t able to qualify for Medicaid and didn’t have health insurance.

“We provided her with her first ultrasound where she could see her fully developed baby, which will be born in the next several weeks,” Hendry said, adding, “It’s always an amazing moment when you are able to show mothers the new life that is living and growing inside their womb.”

The Florida Baptist team connected the woman with a nurse midwife to help with her needs through the remainder of her pregnancy and afterward.”

“Mobile ultrasound unit rescues ‘2 babies & 2 souls’ in 1 day” Baptist press Jul 26, 2011

Even though abortion was not a concern for this woman, the pro-lifers were still there to help her and her baby. The picture many people have of pro-lifers who go to abortion clinics is that of self-righteous men and women harassing abortion patients, but many of the sidewalk counselors and ministries offer real help to women.

 

Share on Facebook

Posters in Chinese villages encourage women to abort

“Better to Let Blood Flow like a River Than to Have One More Than Allowed.”

“You Can Beat It out! You Can Make It Fall Out!  You Could Abort it! But You Cannot Give Birth to It.”

Posters set up by local authorities in Chinese villages supporting the one child policy.

Mara Hvistendahl Unnatural Selection: Choosing Boys over Girls, and the Consequences of a World Full of Men (New York: Public Affairs, 2011) 142

Share on Facebook

Sex selection Infanticide versus abortion in India

Gita Aravamudan wrote a book about the gender imbalance in China, India, and a number of other countries, brought about by the infanticide and abortion of girl babies. She describes the coming crisis as more and more men are unable to find partners, and chronicles how population control activists helped fuel the crisis. From her book:

One Indian woman, Lakshmi who had a living 4-year-old daughter and whose 2nd daughter died under mysterious circumstances (suspected infanticide) was 7 months pregnant and considered “high risk”was interviewed by the author. One of the men standing around her said:

“Look at her. If she has one more girl what will she do? Think of all the expenses. Think of all the clothes she will have to buy, the jewelry she will have to make. Think of the coming of age ceremony she will have to perform, the varadatchinai and seer varisai she will have to give. Where do you think the money will come from? One girl is bad enough…”

From Lakshmi herself:

“It is all very well for you town people to speak. You can afford to have yourself tested by machines and kill the girl child even when it is in the womb. In what way is that less of a crime? Is that not also killing? Has any town woman been arrested for that?”

Gita Aravamudan Disappearing Daughters: the Tragedy of Female Foeticide (New Delhi, India: Penguin Books India, 2007) 10-11

Lakshmi has a point. Is it so different to kill a baby right before birth or to kill her right after? Abortions for sex selection are by definition late-term abortions because the sex of the baby cannot be determined until 18 – 20 weeks.

20 weeks . Is killing this baby now morally acceptable while killing her a few months later is morally wrong?
Share on Facebook

Midwives kill baby girls in India

On infanticide in India:

“There are about 535,000 traditional birth attendants in Bihar for a population of 100 million. In several districts of the state, [the researcher] found that each midwife killed as many as 5 newborn girls a month. The study, released in 1995, was in a formal exercise, but [the researchers] believe that “if anything, the survey underestimated infanticide.”

An organization called Adithi, founded by Vigia Srinivasan, did the research.

Miriam Jordan “Brief Lives” Wall Street Journal, May 9, 2000

 

Share on Facebook

Women more likely to oppose 2nd and 3rd trimester abortions, says poll

Many people assume that most women are pro-choice and that the pro-life movement is made up mostly of men. Nothing could be further from the truth – women outnumber men among pro-life activists and leaders, and polls often show higher levels of support for legalized abortion among men than among women. For example:

15 weeks – illegal to abort in every US state.

“In June 2000, an analysis of polling results by Alissa Rubin of the Los Angeles times concluded that “72% of women support a ban on all abortions after the first trimester of pregnancy, compared to only 58% of men.”

Joseph W Dellapenna Dispelling the Myths of Abortion History (Carolina academic press, 2006) 955 ni34

 

Share on Facebook

NARAL: there should be waiting periods for sterilization, not for abortion

NARAL demanded that a federally imposed 30 day waiting period should be mandated before sterilization, so women would not be coerced.

Karen Mulhauser, executive director of NARAL, fundraising letter, 1979. Judy Klemesrud “Complacency on Abortion: a Warning to Women” New York Times January 23, 1978, A 18

Now called NARAL Pro-Choice America, NARAL aggressively fights against any law that would require women to receive counseling at abortion clinics and wait 24 hours before their abortions. They even oppose posting signs in abortion clinic waiting rooms saying that women cannot be coerced into abortion

They seem to completely ignore the fact that women can also be coerced into abortions.

Share on Facebook

Only 2% of women considered abortion to be the most important issue for women’s organizations

Author Clarke D Forsythe explained in of Abuse of Discretion: the inside Story of Roe Versus Wade (New York: Encounter Books, 2013) how, even when the courts were contemplating overturning Roe versus Wade in 1989, so few women considered abortion rights a priority:

“In 1989, around the time of the Supreme Court’s decision in Webster vs. Reproductive Health Services, which was publicized as a “threat” to “abortion rights,” a poll found that “only 2% of women considered abortion to be the most important issue for women’s organizations, compared to 27% who listed job equity and 5% [who said] childcare…”

Joseph W Dellapenna Dispelling the Myths of Abortion History (Carolina academic press, 2006) 955ni33

Share on Facebook

Pro-choice author bemoans dismal poll numbers

From pro-choice activist and author Alexander Sanger:

“The pro-choice idea that abortion should be legal and available to all women who want one no matter their circumstances garners in polling the support of about one quarter of the American people. We have to do better than that.”

Alexander Sanger Beyond Choice: Reproductive Freedom in the 21st Century (New York: Public Affairs, 2004) 16

Share on Facebook