Nurse Sees Abortion on Sonogram

Nurse interviewed by a Priests for Life researcher described a first trimester abortion she witnessed:

10 week sonogram

 

“The doctor did a sonogram to show me that the baby didn’t feel it. On the sonogram, when he started the suction, the baby’s arms spread out. It immediately threw its hands out. Its little arms spread out. So, you know it had to feel it. [The instrument used for the first trimester abortion] it is a silver tube with stainless steel blades on it. He inserts it first, and then turns on the suction. The baby comes out all shredded. ‘Now, you watch this, and you’ll see how it doesn’t feel a thing.’ [The doctor said] I think it was kind of shocking to him. I looked at him and he looked at me, and then he wouldn’t look at me after that. I don’t think he had used a sonogram before during an abortion. It was over in a short period of time.”

Share on Facebook

Testimony of a Medical Student

This is from a student who preferred to remain anonymous:

“To begin, I must say that until yesterday, Friday, July 2, 2004, I was strongly pro-choice. I am a pre-medical student, and being very scientific, I understood that the mass of cells that forms the fetal body is not often capable of survival before 24 weeks in the womb.

I am also somewhat liberal, and I believed that every woman should have the right to choose what she did with her body and one that could potentially be growing inside of her.

This summer, I was accepted into a pre-medical program in NYC in which we are allowed to shadow doctors and see all sorts of medical procedures. When given the opportunity to see an abortion, I did not hesitate to accept the offer. It was something new, edgy, and exciting that I had never seen.

When I entered the operating room, it felt like any other I had ever been in. On the table in front of me, I saw a woman, legs up as if delivering a child although she was asleep. Next to her was a tray of instruments for the abortion and a vacuum machine for suctioning the fetal tissues from the uterus.

The doctors put on their gowns and masks and the procedure began. The cervix was held open with a crude metal instrument and a large transparent tube was stuck inside of the woman.

Within a matter of seconds, the machine’s motor was engaged and blood, tissue, and tiny organs were pulled out of their environment into a filter. A minute later, the vacuum choked to a halt.

The tube was removed, and stuck to the end was a small body and a head attached haphazardly to it, what was formed of the neck snapped. The ribs had formed with a thin skin covering them, the eyes had formed, and the inner organs had begun to function.

The tiny heart of the fetus,obviously a little boy, had just stopped — forever. The vacuum filter was opened, and the tiny arms and legs that had been torn off of the fetus were accounted for. The fingers and toes had the beginnings of their nails on them.

The doctors, proud of their work, reassembled the body to show me. Tears welled up in my eyes as they removed the baby boy from the table and shoved his body into a container for disposal.

I have not been able to think of anything since yesterday at 10:30 besides what that baby boy might have been. I don’t think that people realize what an abortion actually is until they see it happen.

I have been tortured by these images – so real and so vivid – for two days now…and I was just a spectator. Never again will I be pro-choice, and never again will I support the murder of any human being, no matter their stage in life.”

Sat, Jul 3 22:29:15 2004

Share on Facebook

Nurse at an Abortion Clinic: “I Saw a Little Foot”

“I saw a little foot – caught in the end of the suction tube.”

Nurse who assisted in a number of suction abortions, after viewing the aftermath of one for the first time.

Thomas Gulick “Even Abortionists are Having Second Thoughts” Human Events April 12, 1980

10-week-old aborted baby
Share on Facebook

Doctor Advocates Aborting Imperfect Babies

Some prominent doctors cannot understand why women do not abort their handicapped children. Dr. Cecil B. Jacobson, Chief of the Reproductive Genetics Unit of George Washington University Hospital:

“I can’t imagine any reasonably responsible person arguing against the abortion of mongols [down syndrome babies]… If we could tell what fetuses are going to be affected with cancer in their 40s and 50s, I would be for aborting them now.”

Cecil B. Jacobson, Chief, Reproductive Genetics Unit, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, D.C. Psychology Today, September 1975, page 22.

Share on Facebook

Handicapped Children Often Are Happy to Be Alive

“There is no evidence that the handicapped child would rather not go on living. As a matter of fact, handicapped persons commit suicide far less often than normal persons. An interesting study was done at the Ana Stift in Hanover, Germany, a center where a large number of children with phocomelia, due to thalidomide are cared for. Psychological testing on these children indicated that they do indeed value their lives, that they are glad that they were born, and that they look forward to the future with hope and pleasant anticipation.”

Eugene F. Diamond, MD

Eugene F. Diamond MD “The Deformed Child’s Right to Life” in Death, Dying and Euthanasia, Dennis J. Horan and David Mall, eds (Washington DC: University Publications of America, 1977) 133 quoted in Francis J. Beckwith “Politically Correct Death: Answering the Arguments for Abortion Rights” (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 1993)

Share on Facebook

The Reasons Why Couples Abort Disabled Babies

According to prenatal screening expert Eva Alberman, 92% of women who discover their carrying a fetus affected with Down syndrome choose to have an abortion.

The decision to abort a handicap baby is often framed in terms of concern for the child. Those who support killing these babies often say that they are sparing the children a lifetime of suffering. In reality, often the main reason why women abort their down syndrome children is that the children would be an inconvenience for them. Here is one example:

Natalie and Richard are a couple who aborted down syndrome baby late in pregnancy. Natalie gives the following reasons why she aborted:

“A seriously handicapped child takes a lot from your life that you wouldn’t otherwise have to give… We knew that a Down child would require, at best, constant care from us….”

This quote shows that the true reason that many women abort handicapped babies is their own unwillingness to make sacrifices. While this is understandable, there is a waiting list oof people willing to adopt handicap babies, especially babies with Down syndrome. Adoption is a viable option for these babies.

Mary E Williams. Abortion: Opposing Viewpoints (San Diego, California: Greenhaven Press, 2002) 115

Share on Facebook

Mother of Disabled Child Angered at Doctor’s Assumption That She Would Have Aborted

A woman with a special needs daughter wrote the following:

“My youngest daughter is 10 years old. Developmentally, however, she is more like an infant. She does not speak in words, cannot feed or dress herself, wears diapers and cannot walk without assistance. Hearing this litany of what she cannot do, many people would say it would have been better if she had not been born.

A few weeks ago, I attended a national conference on mental handicaps. Most of the participants were special needs professionals; many were parents. At one of the scientific sessions, a physician spoke about the remarkable strides which have been made in prenatal testing, making it possible to detect a whole host of genetic disorders in the womb. Now, of course, she said ominously, the “decision” can be made by the parents.

Her smug certainty that any “normal” parent would choose to get rid of a baby known to have some disability infuriated me. But what I found really astonishing was the temerity that allowed her to say such things to us, people who actually love and cherish the very children she is targeting for destruction. For us, they are not “the handicapped.” They have names and faces. They have their winning ways, their sweet charms, their difficult behavior patterns. They are our children and here she was telling us we had missed the boat by having them too soon, before the technology existed which would’ve allowed us to get rid of them.”

Joan McGowan, Human Life Review Spring/Summer 2000. Quoted in Mary E Williams. Abortion: Opposing Viewpoints (San Diego, California: Greenhaven Press, 2002)

Share on Facebook

Surgeon General: Disability and Unhappiness Do Not Always Go Together

From former Surgeon General C Everett Koop

“I am frequently told by people who have never had the experience of working with children who are being rehabilitated into our society after the correction of a congenital defect that infants with such defects should be allowed to die or even “encouraged” to die, because their lives could obviously be nothing but unhappy and miserable.

Yet it has been my constant experience that disability and unhappiness do not necessarily go together. Some of the most unhappy children whom I have known have all of the physical and mental faculties and on the other hand some of the happiest youngsters have borne burdens which I myself would find very difficult to bear.”

C Everett Koop “The Slide to Auschwitz” in Ronald Reagan, Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation (Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas Nelson, 1984″ 45 to 46 quoted in Randy Alcorn “Pro-life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments” (Sisters, Oregon: Multnomah Publishers, 2000)

 

Share on Facebook

Research Money Spent on Targeting Disabled Babies for Abortions, Rather Than Treating their Disabilities

The Previous quote was cited in a book by pro-choice author Janet Hadley in her book “Abortion: between Freedom and Necessity” she goes on to say:

“As spending on welfare services diminishes, health policy conservatives are saying that it is better to spend public money on genetic screening (and, implicitly, on selective abortion) than on research into, or treatment of, the diseases themselves.”

Hadley then gives the following statistic: According to studies, in England three out of four doctors require women to agree to an abortion if the fetus is handicapped prior to genetic tests. According to a second study, risk of miscarriage caused by the test itself is not always told to women or is glossed over.

Janet Hadley “Abortion: between Freedom and Necessity” (Great Britain: Virago Press, 1996) 122

Share on Facebook

Parents of Disabled Unborn Babies Are Under Pressure to Abort

Barbara Katz Rothman, author of The Tentative Pregnancy, discusses the pressure that pregnant women who have been shown to be carrying disabled unborn babies are under to abort:

“It seems that, in gaining the choice to control the quality of our children, we may be losing the choice of simply accepting them as they are.”

BK Roffman “the Meaning of Choice in Reproductive Technology” in Test Tube Women: What Future Motherhood, page 30. Quoted in Janet Hadley “Abortion: between Freedom and Necessity” (Great Britain: Virago Press) 1996

Share on Facebook