Associated Press Article On AIDS an Abortion

The Associated Press Reported in the article, “Abortionists Shun AIDS-Infected Women, Survey Finds” March 21 1990:

In a survey, conducted in November 1988 through February 1989, callers from the New York City human rights commission made appointments with 30 abortion clinics and physicians that advertised in the Yellow Pages.

• Twenty abortion clinics canceled the appointment after the caller said she was infected with HIV but had no symptoms of AIDS. Twelve of the 20 said they did not have adequate infection control.

• Others said abortion on an HIV-infected woman was too complicated a procedure for them to handle and referred the caller to a hospital.

Many of the responses “were very hostile,” said a committee lawyer. “Some just hung up or said, We can’t treat your kind.”

Abortionist Lewis Koplik was asked to respond to the story and told reporters that he has an “undocumented gut feeling” that the discrimination might be happening elsewhere. “If you have one woman who has HIV infection or AIDS and can’t get service, that’s a real problem. It’s just something that should not happen,” he said.

Los Angeles obstetrician-gynecologist David Grimes, chairman of Planned Parenthood’s medical advisory committee, told the reporters that he does not believe the problem is widespread, although it may be more apparent on the East Coast where more women are infected with HIV.

Share on Facebook

Abortion Clinics Reject AIDS Patients

The National Academy Of Sciences, HIV Screening of Pregnant Women and Newborns (1991) Reported:

HIV-infected pregnant women who elect to terminate their pregnancies may discover that their access to abortion services is restricted. Some areas report outright exclusion of HIV-infected women by abortion clinics. In an attempt to document the degree to which HIV-infected women were discriminated against in gaining access to abortions revealed that two-thirds of the abortion facilities contacted in the study:

• Canceled appointments made by allegedly HIV-infected women once their infection status was disclosed.

• Some of the facilities attempted a plausible response, such as their inability to handle that type of procedure.

Others:

• Changed the vacation schedules of the physicians or quoted inflated prices for abortion services to discourage those seeking care.

• Openly reported that their staff refused to care for HIV-infected patients.

This information was compiled by Life Dynamics at their website www.deathroe.com

Share on Facebook

Woman with AIDS Forced to Undergo an Abortion

Pro-choice author Janet Hadley tells the following story:

A 38-year-old Haitian woman in New York City learned that she was HIV-positive during her antenatal care in a hospital with an excellent record for high risk pregnancy care. She was advised not to tell anyone her HIV status, that her chances of having a baby with AIDS were extremely high and that she should abort the fetus. She was also told to go home and write her will, because she was going to die. She was asymptomatic.

She chose to continue her pregnancy. When she went for her next routine checkup, she was taken to another building for a meeting with several high-ranking medical personnel. They told her that having a child with AIDS was worse than having a child with spina bifida, which her older daughter has. They said such a child would be a burden to society, and that she would be wrong not to abort. She insisted that she wanted to have the baby and pleaded that they continue her care. They refused, stating that the hospital was not equipped to treat her.

She was referred to another hospital for a second trimester abortion. This was performed without counseling or obtaining her signed consent. She was placed in a room marked “isolation” during her induced labor and left alone screaming for help for 15 minutes after the fetus was expelled. When she hemorrhaged because the abortion was incomplete, she was made to walk down the hall to the operating room. In both hospitals as soon as they knew that she was HIV-positive, she felt they wanted to get rid of her.

The Center for Constitutional rights in New York filed a case against both hospitals for discrimination, inflicting emotional distress, negligence and failure to obtain consent for abortion in the second hospital.”

 

Story was from M. Berer, with S. Ray “Women and HIV/AIDS an International Resource Book” (London: Pandora) page 94, 1993

Quoted in Janet Hadley “Abortion: between Freedom and Necessity” (Great Britain: Virago Press) 1996

Hadley reveals that according to studies, 6 to 8 out of 10 babies born to AIDS infected mothers do not develop AIDS.

One third of abortion clinics in the US do not operate an HIV-positive patients or they raise their fees (page 130)

Share on Facebook

HIV-positive woman coerced into second trimester abortion

Pro-choice author Janet Hadley tells the following story:

A 38-year-old Haitian woman in New York City learned that she was HIV-positive during her antenatal care in a hospital with an excellent record for high risk pregnancy care. She was advised not to tell anyone her HIV status, that her chances of having a baby with AIDS were extremely high and that she should abort the fetus. She was also told to go home and write her will, because she was going to die. She was asymptomatic.

She chose to continue her pregnancy. When she went for her next routine checkup, she was taken to another building for a meeting with several high-ranking medical personnel. They told her that having a child with AIDS was worse than having a child with spina bifida, which her older daughter has. They said such a child would be a burden to society, and that she would be wrong not to abort. She insisted that she wanted to have the baby and pleaded that they continue her care. They refused, stating that the hospital was not equipped to treat her.

She was referred to another hospital for a second trimester abortion. This was performed without counseling or obtaining her signed consent. She was placed in a room marked “isolation” during her induced labor and left alone screaming for help for 15 minutes after the fetus was expelled. When she hemorrhaged because the abortion was incomplete, she was made to walk down the hall to the operating room. In both hospitals as soon as they knew that she was HIV-positive, she felt they wanted to get rid of her.

The Center for Constitutional rights in New York filed a case against both hospitals for discrimination, inflicting emotional distress, negligence and failure to obtain consent for abortion in the second hospital.”

Story was from M. Berer, with S. Ray Women and HIV/AIDS an International Resource Book (London: Pandora) page 94, 1993

Quoted in Janet Hadley Abortion: Between Freedom and Necessity (Great Britain: Virago Press) 1996

Hadley reveals that according to studies, 6 to 8 out of 10 babies born to AIDS infected mothers do not develop AIDS. If the mother’s HIV-positive status is known, precautions in the delivery room can greatly reduce the chances of the baby contracting AIDS.

Share on Facebook

Dr. Warren Hern On “Abortionist”

Dr. Warren Hern, who is a well known late term abortion provider, and who has written a book on abortion practice and trained other physicians, has encouraged the press to stop calling him an “abortionist.”

When the Rocky Mountain News ran a story about him under the title of “Abortionist Threatened in Letters” he said the following (as quoted by The Rocky Mountain News in a subsequent article.)

“‘For me it’s like a racial epithet – your editors wouldn’t consider running a headline that said “N-gger hit by car.” It’s offensive.

(As for the word abortion) of course that’s not offensive. I’m proud of what I do. It’s a straightforward description of an operation, OK? ‘Abortionist’ is like many terms in history laden with meanings – like ‘final solution,’ which will never be separated from the hideous death camps of World War II.” Hern continued, “One of the reasons ‘abortionist’ has become offensive is that it’s used as a propaganda term . . . part of the anti-abortion people’s Orwellian approach to language…..”

 

Abortionist: A Thorn in a Thicket of Issues” Rocky Mountain News, Oct 9, 1994. Quoted by Life Dynamics

Is being called a doctor whose practice consists of doing abortions an abortionist equal to calling an African American a N-gger? Doesn’t the term “abortionist” simply state what the doctor does? How is such a simple, descriptive term so offensive when it directly applies to a person’s actions?

Incidentally, 90% of abortions in America are done not in hospitals or doctor’s offices but in outpatient clinics. Many of the doctors employed by these clinics do nothing but abortions. In fact, in America, only 2% of ob/gyns do half of all abortions.(*) Many of these doctors do thousands of abortions a year, moonlighting at several different abortion clinics. According to one owner of an abortion clinic chain:

* Dolores P. “Ask an Abortion Provider” The Hairpin. March 3, 2011 (can be found here

Share on Facebook

Stigma Attached to the Word “Abortionist”

Dr. Don Sloan has been providing abortions for years. In one essay defending legal abortion he says the following:

“The term “abortionist” still carries with it a heavy weight. We’ve made it [abortion] legal, but we haven’t made it respectable – not quite.”

Don Sloan “Abortion Should Not Be Restricted,” Originally Published in “Basic Issues in the Abortion Debate” Political Affairs, July 1999. Reprinted in Mary E Williams. Abortion: Opposing Viewpoints (San Diego, California: Greenhaven Press, 2002)

Share on Facebook

Trying to Make Abortion “Respectable”

In an interview with 20/20 abortionist Dr. Jane Hodgson said:

“I used to have to steel myself to use the word (abortionist), and it was sort of my goal, I’ve got to make abortion respectable. So I’d startle people at parties sometimes, I think.

By saying that I was an abortionist. And they’d kind of- their jaws would drop, you know, back then.”

20/20 May 24, 1991 (Cited by Life Dynamics ROEBOTS)

Share on Facebook

Stigma in the Medical Profession

In his book “Abortion Practice” Warren Hern says the following:

“Abortion has been stigmatized in the medical profession. Until recently the public and large segments of the medical profession considered abortion to be an unethical medical act regardless of its legal status…Communities do not like to be reminded that abortions are occurring within their boundaries…Candor invites both criticism and harassment; very few abortion clinics or physicians providing abortion services include the word abortion in the title identifying the activity.”

Many abortion clinics, even today, are identified by euphanisms such “Women’s Clinic” “Surgery Center” “Women’s Hospital” rather than “Abortion Clinic.”

Warren Hern, M.D. “Abortion Practice” (J.B. Lippenott Company 1984) p 317

Share on Facebook

Don’t Call Me an Abortionist

In the LA Times September 22, 1991, it was reported that Dr. Stuart Sitzman, a gynecologist who has performed abortions for his private patients before, told them he’d be happy to be quoted by name.

He told them, however:

“Just don’t call me an abortionist.”

Cited by Life Dynamics ROEBOTS

Share on Facebook

Pro-Life and Pro-Love

Reverand Phillip A. Wogamen of Foundry United Methodist Church in Washington D.C. said the following at a Planned Parenthood prayer break:

“Real love for children means having the number of children that one can care for responsibly and lovingly….Bringing every conceived child into existence is not “pro-life”: it is certainly not pro-love.”

Quoted in Gloria Feldt “Behind Every Choice is a Story” (Denton, TX: University of North Texas Press, 2002) p 113

10-week-old aborted baby – is this “pro-love”?
Share on Facebook